 The rule of the common law is, that where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach of contract, he is, so far as money can do it, to be placed in the same situation, with respect to damages, as if the contract had been performed.  The American Law Register - Стр. 5141855Полный просмотр - Подробнее о книге
 | 1926 - Страниц: 254
...one party to the contract was a lunatic was known to the other contracting party; and (2) that when a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach of contract,...so far as money can do it, to be placed in the same position with respect to damages as if the contract had been performed. The case also shows that very... | |
 | 1868 - Страниц: 968
...hesitation adopted Hopkim r. Grazebrook. He says there at page 865, " The ruleof the common law is, that where a party sustains, a loss by reason of a breach of contract he is so for as money can do it to be placed in the same situaENOELL v. FITCH AND OTHERS. tion with respect... | |
 | 1867 - Страниц: 718
...The general rule as laid down by Parke, B. is, that where a contract is broken, the injured person is, so far as money can do it, to be placed in the game position u ith respect to damages as if the contract had been performed. This is the amount of... | |
 | 1923 - Страниц: 610
...upon the rule as stated in Anson on Contracts, 15th ed. p. 384. The rule of the Common Law is, that, where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed [per Parke, B. in Robinson v. Harman, I Ex. 855.] In support of his claim for damages he referred to... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court, Thomas Alexander Marshall, William C. Smedes, Volney Erskine Howard, Robert John Walker, John Franklin Cushman, James Zachariah George - 1913 - Страниц: 1048
...be derived at all." Blagen v. Thompson, 23 Or. 239, 31 Pac. 647, 18 LKA 315. It is also stated that, "where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach of a 'contract, he shall, so far as money can do it, be placed in the same situation with respect to damages... | |
 | Alfred William Brian Simpson - 1987 - Страниц: 458
...statement is that of Parke B. in Robinson v. Harman (1848) 21 : " The rule of the common law is, that where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed." But there are earlier formulations of a principle which was formulated in terms of giving the plaintiff... | |
 | E. Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood - 1992 - Страниц: 728
...must be foreseeable". The same basic principles are met in common law. The rule of English law is that "where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed" (Robinson v. Harman (1848) 1 Exch. 850, at 855; and in particular as to loss of profits: Anson's Law... | |
 | R. Rayfuse - 1993 - Страниц: 758
...must be foreseeable". The same basic principles are met in common law. The rule of English law is that "where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed" (Robinson \. Harman ( 1 848) 1 Exch . 850, at 855 ; and in particular as to loss of profits: Anson's... | |
 | M. P. O'Reilly - 1996 - Страниц: 428
...contractor. 25 In Roliinson v. Harman 1 1 848i 1 Ex 850 Parke B. said: "The rule of common law is, that where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed". The claimant must demonstrate that he has suffered the loss27 and that the damage is attributable to... | |
 | Peter Birks - 1996 - Страниц: 362
...of it is the well known dictum of Parke B. in Robinson v Harman: The rule of the common law is, that where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...can do it, to be placed in the same situation, with respects to damages, as if the contract had been performed.8 But the full compensation principle is... | |
| |
