Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision touching anything involved in a controversy, he cannot, after litigation has begun, change his ground, and put his conduct upon another and a different consideration. He is not permitted thus to... The Federal Reporter - Стр. 2481903Полный просмотр - Подробнее о книге
| 1920 - Страниц: 512
...may. — Coon v. Sonoma Magnesite Co., Cal.. 189 Pac. 271. SB. E»«opp«l — Change of Ground. — Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision...Involved in a controversy he cannot, after litigation has been begun, change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different consideration, as he is... | |
| 1906 - Страниц: 530
...advantage by such a wrong. In the ease of Hallway Co. v. McCarthy, 96 US 2«7, Mr. Justice Swayne said: "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...touching anything involved In a controversy, he cannot lifter litigation has begun, change his ground and put bis conduct on another and different consideration.... | |
| 1920 - Страниц: 490
...Entoppel — Change of Position. — Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision as to anything involved in a controversy, he cannot, after...begun, change his ground and put his conduct upon a different consideration and so mend his holding. — Mitchell v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen... | |
| 1878 - Страниц: 542
...on the Sabbath. This point was an afterthought suggested by the pressure and exigences of the case. Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision touching anything involved in a controversy, he can not, after litigation has begun, change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different... | |
| 1921 - Страниц: 500
...that, where a party yrives a reason for his conduct and decision touching anything involved in the controversy, he cannot, after litigation has begun,...change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different consideration. — Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Petropoi, Ga., 105 SE 48. 40. Evidence — Admisslbility.... | |
| 1910 - Страниц: 506
...i>lay, expressed by Mr. Justice Swayne, in Railway Company v. McCarthy, 96 US 267, 24 L. Ed. C93. that "where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision touching anything in a controversy, he cannot, after litigation has begun, put his conduct in another and different consideration.... | |
| John Allen Finch - 1907 - Страниц: 544
...that where a party assigns a reason for his conduct and decision touching the matter inTolved in the controversy, he cannot, after litigation has begun,...change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different consideration. Where an agent for an insurance company, under a salary contract and for certain... | |
| 1920 - Страниц: 304
...taken. In Railway Co. v. McCarthy, 96 US 258, 267 (24 L. Ed. 693) the court, by Justice Swayze, said : " 'Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...estopped from doing it by a settled principle of law.' "This rule is well established, and its application is compellable, by close analogy, to the situation... | |
| 1913 - Страниц: 1260
...expressed in Railway Co. v. McCarthy, 96 US 258, 268 (24 L. Ed. G93). In that case Justice Swayne says: 'Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...change his ground and put his conduct upon another and n different consideration, lie is not permitted thus to mend his hold. He is estopped from doing it... | |
| 1921 - Страниц: 960
...but upon other grounds refuses to sell, the owner's right to stand upon such an objection is waived. "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different consideration." Fenn v. Ware, 100 Ga. 563 (1), 566, 28 SE 238, 239; Tuggle v. Green, 25 Ga.... | |
| |