 | Christopher Gustavus Tiedeman - 1900 - Страниц: 676
...who framed oar constitution, and the people who adopted it, mist be understood to have employed woods in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. * * ' We know of no rule for construing the extent of such powers, other tlun is given by the language... | |
 | Joseph Hugh Brady - 1954 - Страниц: 214
...concealment generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution,...natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. 74 The same Chief Justice, in another case in 1830, pointed out the procedure which the recent Court... | |
 | North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan, Edwin James Taylor - 1922 - Страниц: 712
...People v. New York CR Co. 24 NY 485, 486. As the great jurist, Marshall, said : The framers of the Constitution, and the people who adopted it, "must...sense, and to have intended what they have said." Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 188, 6 L. ed. 23, 68. The noted Judge Cooley, said : "Narrow and technical... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1882 - Страниц: 782
...convey, the enlightened patriote who framed our constitution, and the people who adopted It, muet b* understood to have employed words in their natural...respecting the extent of any given power, it is a wellsettled rule that the objects »for which [*180 it was given, especially when those objects are... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1959 - Страниц: 314
...Constitution. And Chief Justice Marshall said again in his great opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1, that : The enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution...people who adopted it must be understood * * * to have intended what they said. Let us then undertake to determine whether the Supreme Court has usurped the... | |
 | 1922 - Страниц: 1620
...natural and ordinary meaning. As Marshall, Ch. J., says : The framers of the Constitution, and ths people who adopted it, 'must be understood to have...natural sense and to have intended what they have said.' This is but saying that no forced or unnatural construction is to be put upon their language." In Sturges... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1962 - Страниц: 116
...United States) . Chief Justice John Marshall declared in his great opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden that "the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution...people who adopted it must be understood * * * to have intended what they said." This being true, it is as clear as the noonday sun that the role of the Supreme... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1962 - Страниц: 124
...United States) . Chief Justice John Marshall declared in his great opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden that "the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution...people who adopted it must be understood * * * to have intended what they said." This being true, it is as clear as the noonday sun that the role of the Supreme... | |
| |
As men whose intentions require no concealment, generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to... 
