The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 44
Стр. 305
... prior art and because they failed to meet the standard of pat- entable invention . Judgment affirmed . 1. Patents 328 Reissue Patent No. 22,865 , which was issued on the basis of Patent No. 2,215,944 , and which related generally to a ...
... prior art and because they failed to meet the standard of pat- entable invention . Judgment affirmed . 1. Patents 328 Reissue Patent No. 22,865 , which was issued on the basis of Patent No. 2,215,944 , and which related generally to a ...
Стр. 359
... prior art , we concur with the views of the district court that the combination of the old elements in the patent was a mere aggregation , and that it does not partake of the quality of invention . Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v ...
... prior art , we concur with the views of the district court that the combination of the old elements in the patent was a mere aggregation , and that it does not partake of the quality of invention . Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v ...
Стр. 1027
... art and invention may not be perceived in the adaption . - Buffalo ... prior date for conception and construct- ive reduction of alleged invention ... art , rather than those attributable mere- ly to a person having ordinary skill in the ...
... art and invention may not be perceived in the adaption . - Buffalo ... prior date for conception and construct- ive reduction of alleged invention ... art , rather than those attributable mere- ly to a person having ordinary skill in the ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
9 Cir action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst Attorney Bankruptcy carrier cars cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 215 claim claimant cold cathode Commission Commissioner constitute contract conviction corporation counsel count Court of Appeals Criminal Law decision defendant defendant's dence denied District Court Eminent Domain employees entitled evidence excess profits taxes F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed finding held hot cathode indictment interest Internal Revenue issue judgment jurisdiction jury L.Ed Labor Relations Board liability ment motion National Labor Relations operation opinion owner parties patent petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding pyridine question reason record reduction to practice remanded rule S.Ct Section Stat statute summary judgment supra taxpayer testified testimony tion trial court trial judge trustee U. S. Atty United States Court United States District violation witness York