The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 77
Стр. 176
STATE CORP . COMMISSION OF KANSAS V. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION . NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO . V. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION . Nos . 14704 , 14706 , 14733 . United States Court of Appeals , Eighth Circuit . Aug. 17 , 1954 . Natural gas company ...
STATE CORP . COMMISSION OF KANSAS V. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION . NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO . V. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION . Nos . 14704 , 14706 , 14733 . United States Court of Appeals , Eighth Circuit . Aug. 17 , 1954 . Natural gas company ...
Стр. 183
... Commission's power to fix rates under section 5 ( a ) is prospec- tive only , and rates so fixed are ap- plicable only to the future . The Commission is given no power to enter reparation orders with re- spect to rates . Its power over ...
... Commission's power to fix rates under section 5 ( a ) is prospec- tive only , and rates so fixed are ap- plicable only to the future . The Commission is given no power to enter reparation orders with re- spect to rates . Its power over ...
Стр. 885
... Commission setting up the above situa- tion and asking the Commission amend its order of July 10 so that Unit- ed's new filing in so far as it affected the Ideal contract would be rejected and the 14.5 ¢ rate would not be permitted to ...
... Commission setting up the above situa- tion and asking the Commission amend its order of July 10 so that Unit- ed's new filing in so far as it affected the Ideal contract would be rejected and the 14.5 ¢ rate would not be permitted to ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
9 Cir action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst Attorney Bankruptcy carrier cars cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 215 claim claimant cold cathode Commission Commissioner constitute contract conviction corporation counsel count Court of Appeals Criminal Law decision defendant defendant's dence denied District Court Eminent Domain employees entitled evidence excess profits taxes F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed finding held hot cathode indictment interest Internal Revenue issue judgment jurisdiction jury L.Ed Labor Relations Board liability ment motion National Labor Relations operation opinion owner parties patent petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding pyridine question reason record reduction to practice remanded rule S.Ct Section Stat statute summary judgment supra taxpayer testified testimony tion trial court trial judge trustee U. S. Atty United States Court United States District violation witness York