The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 78
Стр. 222
... decision as to the legal rights of the parties is not controlling as to the incidence of the federal income tax . There seems , however , to be a tendency in many cases of this sort to ignore the basic fact that the state decision did ...
... decision as to the legal rights of the parties is not controlling as to the incidence of the federal income tax . There seems , however , to be a tendency in many cases of this sort to ignore the basic fact that the state decision did ...
Стр. 486
... decision of Commissioner of Patents holding trade - marks of applicant and opposer not confusingly similar , United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals was without authority to consider ex parte portion of decision which denied ...
... decision of Commissioner of Patents holding trade - marks of applicant and opposer not confusingly similar , United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals was without authority to consider ex parte portion of decision which denied ...
Стр. 758
... decision on his observation of Ennis . We express no opinion on the value of such a decision or whether we would uphold such a decision if the Deputy Commissioner had stated in his order that he was disregarding all the evidence and ...
... decision on his observation of Ennis . We express no opinion on the value of such a decision or whether we would uphold such a decision if the Deputy Commissioner had stated in his order that he was disregarding all the evidence and ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Atty bank basis Board brief cause charge Chief Circuit Judge Cite as 223 claim clear Commissioner Communist Company considered constitutional contract Control conviction corporation counsel Court of Appeals Criminal damages decision defendant denied determination directed District Court effect employee error evidence fact failed Federal filed finding follows further Government ground held income injuries interest Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Code involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed limited mark material matter means ment motion negligence objection officers operation opinion organization Party patent payment person plaintiff present prior proceeding question reason received record reference registration Relations respect result rule S.Ct says specific Stat statement statute sufficient sustained testimony tion trial Union United witness