The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 77
Стр. 281
... considered ; it should be considered in every case of this type since it is logically a factor of considerable importance to be given much weight in reaching the ultimate conclusion as to whether or not there is likelihood of confusion ...
... considered ; it should be considered in every case of this type since it is logically a factor of considerable importance to be given much weight in reaching the ultimate conclusion as to whether or not there is likelihood of confusion ...
Стр. 446
... considered opinion . H. Fendrich , Inc. v . C. I. R. , 7 Cir . , 192 F.2d 916. The question came up again in City Machine and Tool Co. v . C. I. R. , 21 T.C. 937 , which the Tax Court also had decided in accordance with its opinion in ...
... considered opinion . H. Fendrich , Inc. v . C. I. R. , 7 Cir . , 192 F.2d 916. The question came up again in City Machine and Tool Co. v . C. I. R. , 21 T.C. 937 , which the Tax Court also had decided in accordance with its opinion in ...
Стр. 733
... considered in an ap- propriate case " and ( 2 ) that “ All circum- stances under which the respective mer- chandise is marketed and sold should be considered in determining the likelihood of confusion and deception . " We shall discuss ...
... considered in an ap- propriate case " and ( 2 ) that “ All circum- stances under which the respective mer- chandise is marketed and sold should be considered in determining the likelihood of confusion and deception . " We shall discuss ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst bank bankruptcy Board Brian Holland cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 223 claim Commissioner Company contract conviction corporation counsel Court of Appeals Criminal Law damages decision defendant defendant's dence District Court District Judge District of Columbia employee error evidence F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed finding Government held income tax indictment injuries intent Internal Revenue issue ixtle judgment jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed lant's liability ment motion negligence opinion ordinary income patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff prior art proceeding prosecution question reason record registration remanded rule S.Ct Samish Section sion sisal Stat statement statute supra sustained Tax Court taxpayer testified testimony tion trade-mark trial court trial judge trust U. S. Atty Union United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington witness