The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 78
Стр. 159
... Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit . June 17 , 1955 . cause " for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion " , the trial court , under the mandate of the Court of Appeals , could have granted a new trial if it was made to ...
... Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit . June 17 , 1955 . cause " for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion " , the trial court , under the mandate of the Court of Appeals , could have granted a new trial if it was made to ...
Стр. 446
... Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit , the Tax Court decision in the Fendrich case on the jurisdictional point was reversed in a considered opinion . H. Fendrich , Inc. v . C. I. R. , 7 Cir . , 192 F.2d 916. The question came up ...
... Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit , the Tax Court decision in the Fendrich case on the jurisdictional point was reversed in a considered opinion . H. Fendrich , Inc. v . C. I. R. , 7 Cir . , 192 F.2d 916. The question came up ...
Стр. 993
... Court of Appeals is appellate court and criminal cases are not therein tried de novo and alleged errors sought to be reviewed therein should be pointed out and traced to concrete rulings of trial court in manner provided by court rules ...
... Court of Appeals is appellate court and criminal cases are not therein tried de novo and alleged errors sought to be reviewed therein should be pointed out and traced to concrete rulings of trial court in manner provided by court rules ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst bank bankruptcy Board Brian Holland certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 223 claim Commissioner Company contract conviction corporation counsel Court of Appeals Criminal Law damages decision defendant defendant's dence denied District Court District Judge District of Columbia employee error evidence F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed finding Government held income tax indictment injuries intent Internal Revenue issue ixtle judgment jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed lant's liability ment motion negligence opinion ordinary income patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff prior art proceeding prosecution question reason record registration remanded rule S.Ct Samish Section sion sisal Stat statement statute supra sustained Tax Court taxpayer testified testimony tion trade-mark trial court trial judge trust U. S. Atty Union United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington witness