The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1958 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 73
Стр. 264
... Question of alleged excessiveness of verdict was not reviewable by Court of Appeals , but if reviewable , award of $ 20,000 to 38 year old woman with four children who suffered whiplash injury to her neck , and injuries to her back with ...
... Question of alleged excessiveness of verdict was not reviewable by Court of Appeals , but if reviewable , award of $ 20,000 to 38 year old woman with four children who suffered whiplash injury to her neck , and injuries to her back with ...
Стр. 688
... question re- quires us to consider some additional facts . The Huff Smith Act trial com- menced on April 15 , 1953 , and ended on October 10 , 1953. On July 21 , 1953 , while under cross - examination as a wit- ness for the defendants ...
... question re- quires us to consider some additional facts . The Huff Smith Act trial com- menced on April 15 , 1953 , and ended on October 10 , 1953. On July 21 , 1953 , while under cross - examination as a wit- ness for the defendants ...
Стр. 1002
... question of law arises , but where facts are in dispute , their ascertainment is question for jury.- Doane Agr . Service , Inc. v . Coleman , 254 F.2d 40 . 2151. Conflicting evidence . C.A.Tenn . Where facts are undisputed or permit of ...
... question of law arises , but where facts are in dispute , their ascertainment is question for jury.- Doane Agr . Service , Inc. v . Coleman , 254 F.2d 40 . 2151. Conflicting evidence . C.A.Tenn . Where facts are undisputed or permit of ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed agent alleged amended appellant appellant's appellee application Asst attorney barratry Board Boyd County certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 254 claim Commission Commissioner contract corporation counsel count Court of Appeals CURIAM damages decision declaratory judgment defendant denied dismissed District Court District Judge employee error evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed Government guilty held holding pawl income indictment injury insured Internal Revenue issue judgment jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Major Appliance ment motion negligence operation opinion parties patent pawl payment Pegram person petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding question ratchet record reduction to practice registration remanded rule S.Ct Section sentence Stat statute supra Supreme Court Tax Court taxpayer testimony Texas tion trade-mark trial court U. S. Atty United States Court United States District valve verdict Washington witness WSAZ York