Effective Closing ArgumentMichie Company, 1989 - Всего страниц: 796 Examples of summations from such famous advocates as Daniel Webster, Abraham Lincoln, Clarence Darrow, F. Lee Bailey, and many others, are prvided in this hardbound text. Each summation is interspersed with analysis, comments, and questions, often by the advocates themselves, to point out principles attorneys can apply in their own final arguments. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 77
Стр. 110
... Jurors usually want to reach a decision which is just and fair , rather than simply the result of a legal technicality . Counsel's initial task , therefore , is to make explicit the undeclared ethical beliefs and opinions of the jurors ...
... Jurors usually want to reach a decision which is just and fair , rather than simply the result of a legal technicality . Counsel's initial task , therefore , is to make explicit the undeclared ethical beliefs and opinions of the jurors ...
Стр. 130
... jurors to envision the difference in terms of a football field : the plaintiff need only be over the midfield line ... Jurors may have difficulty understanding certain instruc- tions , and may be dominated by one or more of their fellow ...
... jurors to envision the difference in terms of a football field : the plaintiff need only be over the midfield line ... Jurors may have difficulty understanding certain instruc- tions , and may be dominated by one or more of their fellow ...
Стр. 140
... jurors of their responses to the voir dire questions - for example , that they promised to compensate the plaintiff fully and fairly according to the evidence . Counsel will commonly couple this with the charge that the difficult burden ...
... jurors of their responses to the voir dire questions - for example , that they promised to compensate the plaintiff fully and fairly according to the evidence . Counsel will commonly couple this with the charge that the difficult burden ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
accused appeal argu Attorney Bailey bank robbery believe Bobby Franks boys Browning cancer cause charged closing argument conclusion consider contamination Corp counsel courtroom crime criminal Darrow death defendant defendant's Doctor duty effect emotional ethos evidence expert fact going Gold Shield guilty Harvester Ant heard Honor Hosp human improper argument indictment inferences judge jurors jury instructions jury's Karen Silkwood Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corp kill knew ladies and gentlemen lawyers Leopold and Loeb liability ment mind murder N.C. App Nancy Ling Perry nanocuries pathos Patricia Hearst Patty Hearst Paul person plaintiff plant plutonium Prejudicial present prosecution punitive damages question reasonable doubt rebuttal recall remember Rptr rules Shernoff side issue Smith Spence statement strict liability talk tell testified testimony theme thing tion told urine samples verdict weapon witness credibility