The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 7
Стр. 140
... Elekta licensed Eureka , an American corporation , to act as exclusive exhibitor of the film in the United States until 1939. Eureka took out American copyrights in its own name on the film in 1936 and 1940. In 1938 , Elekta licensed ...
... Elekta licensed Eureka , an American corporation , to act as exclusive exhibitor of the film in the United States until 1939. Eureka took out American copyrights in its own name on the film in 1936 and 1940. In 1938 , Elekta licensed ...
Стр. 141
... Elekta , and a similar judgment obtained by default against Elekta in New York in 1948. Both judgments decided that Machaty was the present owner of the distribution rights as against Elekta . The trial judge excluded both judgments ...
... Elekta , and a similar judgment obtained by default against Elekta in New York in 1948. Both judgments decided that Machaty was the present owner of the distribution rights as against Elekta . The trial judge excluded both judgments ...
Стр. 145
... Elekta , and that Weingarten's rights superseded Eureka's because Eure- ka's license from Elekta had expired , and Weingarten's was still in effect . We think its injunction , limited by these facts , must be construed to prohibit ...
... Elekta , and that Weingarten's rights superseded Eureka's because Eure- ka's license from Elekta had expired , and Weingarten's was still in effect . We think its injunction , limited by these facts , must be construed to prohibit ...
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 1 |
Judges VII | 21 |
Supreme Court Rules XLVII | 22 |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed Air Freight alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Aruba Asst automobile Board cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claim Commission Commissioner Company complaint contract Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant defendant's denied dismissed District Court Elekta employees evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed finding granted held income insured interest Internal Revenue issue judgment June June 25 jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Lanham Act lease liability ment motion negligence operation opinion parties patent payment pen points petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding purchase question reasonable record rule S.Ct Section Stat statute suit supra taxpayer testimony tion trade-mark trial court U. S. Atty Union United States Attorney United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York York City