The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1963 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 12
Стр. 226
... double patenting " . 3. Patents 120 Double patenting may exist even where the claims in two cases are not mutually cross - readable . 4. Patents 113 ( 1 ) A question not raised below would not be considered by Court of Customs and Patent ...
... double patenting " . 3. Patents 120 Double patenting may exist even where the claims in two cases are not mutually cross - readable . 4. Patents 113 ( 1 ) A question not raised below would not be considered by Court of Customs and Patent ...
Стр. 230
... double patenting . " Why ? Obviously , nothing would be pat- ented twice if a patent were granted on the invention of the appealed claim . There would be two patents on two in- ventions . Why not ? The court's opinion avoids this prob ...
... double patenting . " Why ? Obviously , nothing would be pat- ented twice if a patent were granted on the invention of the appealed claim . There would be two patents on two in- ventions . Why not ? The court's opinion avoids this prob ...
Стр. 232
... double patenting " for the rea- son that no such disclaimer has been filed . There is only the barest sugges- tion of such a possibility in appellants ' brief . For the same reason there is no occasion to pass on the effect In re Siu ...
... double patenting " for the rea- son that no such disclaimer has been filed . There is only the barest sugges- tion of such a possibility in appellants ' brief . For the same reason there is no occasion to pass on the effect In re Siu ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affidavit affirmed agreement alleged amended appellant appellant's appellee application Attorney bargaining Brown & Root CCPA charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 319 claims Company compound construction contract contractor conviction Corp corporation counsel counts Court of Appeals Criminal decision defendant defendant's denied disclosed District Court District Judge double patenting employees engine epoxy Esperdy evidence F.Supp fact federal filed funds Government guilty habeas corpus heating plant held invention issue judgment June jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed ment methyl isothiocyanate motion National Labor Relations negligence operation opinion parties patent payment petition petitioner phosgenation plaintiff prior art proceeding question reason record reduction to practice rejection rule S.Ct Section sentence sion specific SPENCER BELL statement statute supra Supreme Court testified testimony tion trial court U. S. Atty union United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York