The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1963 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 89
Стр. 224
... claims 24 and 38 were allowable over the prior art . We are confronted with the issue of undue multiplicity of claims raised by the board's affirmance of the examiner's rejection of all the claims on this ground . As apposite precedent ...
... claims 24 and 38 were allowable over the prior art . We are confronted with the issue of undue multiplicity of claims raised by the board's affirmance of the examiner's rejection of all the claims on this ground . As apposite precedent ...
Стр. 257
... claims . " What does all this mean ? In the first place , it is to be noted that the board , like the examiner , made no distinction be- tween the claims to a feed , which have been dropped ( except for the allowed claims specifying ...
... claims . " What does all this mean ? In the first place , it is to be noted that the board , like the examiner , made no distinction be- tween the claims to a feed , which have been dropped ( except for the allowed claims specifying ...
Стр. 269
... claims 26 , 27 and 43 , while claims 28 and 32 recite a method of forming the claimed compo- sition which comprises masticating to- gether the various components thereof . Claims 30 and 31 are drawn to an ex- truded article of the ...
... claims 26 , 27 and 43 , while claims 28 and 32 recite a method of forming the claimed compo- sition which comprises masticating to- gether the various components thereof . Claims 30 and 31 are drawn to an ex- truded article of the ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affidavit affirmed agreement alleged amended appellant appellant's appellee application Attorney bargaining Brown & Root CCPA charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 319 claims Company compound construction contract contractor conviction Corp corporation counsel counts Court of Appeals Criminal decision defendant defendant's denied disclosed District Court District Judge double patenting employees engine epoxy Esperdy evidence F.Supp fact federal filed funds Government guilty habeas corpus heating plant held invention issue judgment June jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed ment methyl isothiocyanate motion National Labor Relations negligence operation opinion parties patent payment petition petitioner phosgenation plaintiff prior art proceeding question reason record reduction to practice rejection rule S.Ct Section sentence sion specific SPENCER BELL statement statute supra Supreme Court testified testimony tion trial court U. S. Atty union United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York