Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 82
Стр. 1021
On Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court of the United States . 3 Elizabeth Overton BUSCH , Petitioner , v . JoDaniel N. Kirby , Harry W. Kroeger , seph D. NUNAN , Jr. , Commissioner of and Frank H. Fisse , all of St. Louis ...
On Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court of the United States . 3 Elizabeth Overton BUSCH , Petitioner , v . JoDaniel N. Kirby , Harry W. Kroeger , seph D. NUNAN , Jr. , Commissioner of and Frank H. Fisse , all of St. Louis ...
Стр. 1022
P. Wenchel , Chief Counsel , and John W. Decision of the Tax Court of the United Smith , Atty . , Bureau of Internal Revenue , States affirmed and petition to review dis- both of Washington , D. C. , for respondent . missed without ...
P. Wenchel , Chief Counsel , and John W. Decision of the Tax Court of the United Smith , Atty . , Bureau of Internal Revenue , States affirmed and petition to review dis- both of Washington , D. C. , for respondent . missed without ...
Стр. 1086
Where decisive issue is one of law only , the decision of Tax Court interpreting the applicable statutory provisions has no peculiar finality and is reviewable . - Farid - EsSultaneh v . C. I. R. , 160 F.2d 812 . C.C.A.2 .
Where decisive issue is one of law only , the decision of Tax Court interpreting the applicable statutory provisions has no peculiar finality and is reviewable . - Farid - EsSultaneh v . C. I. R. , 160 F.2d 812 . C.C.A.2 .
Отзывы - Написать отзыв
Не удалось найти ни одного отзыва.
Содержание
Tables of Cases Reported XV | 17 |
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure XLV | 26 |
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure XLVI | 232 |
Авторские права | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 3
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action Administrator affirmed alleged amended amount appeal appellee application Associate authority Board brief cause charge Circuit Judge Cite as 160 City claims Commission Company complainant considered contract Control corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determine directed dismissed District Court effect employees entered entitled established evidence fact Federal filed further given granted ground held interest issue judgment jury L.Ed Labor land limited March matter maximum meaning ment motion negligence Office operation opinion paid parties patent period person petition plaintiff position present proceeding production purchase question railroad reasonable received record regulation Relations respondent result rule S.Ct sentence Stat statute substantial suit taken testimony tion trial trust union United violation Washington witness York