 | John R. Searle - 1979 - Страниц: 206
...the separate conventions of fiction, it would seem that fiction is merely lying. What distinguishes fiction from lies is the existence of a separate set...knows to be not true even though he has no intention to deceive. We have discussed the question of what makes it possible for an author to use words literally... | |
 | Peter A. French, Theodore Edward Uehling, Howard K. Wettstein - 1979 - Страниц: 430
...the separate conventions of fiction, it would seem that fiction is merely lying. What distinguishes fiction from lies is the existence of a separate set...knows to be not true even though he has no intention to deceive. We have discussed the question of what makes it possible for an author to use words literally... | |
 | Cordell D. K. Yee - 1997 - Страниц: 182
...fictional works as consisting of "pretended" speech acts. These pretended speech acts are governed by "a set of conventions which enables the author to go...knows to be not true even though he has no intention to deceive" (Searle, "Logical Status of Fictional Discourse," 326). In short, what some philosophers... | |
| |
... the rule. But in contrast, fiction is much more sophisticated than lying. To someone who did not understand the separate conventions of fiction, it would seem that fiction is merely lying. What distinguishes fiction from lies is the existence of a... 