Изображения страниц

This bread or body must be spiritual, again, because the bodies of men, according to their present organization, cannot be kept for ever alive. But their souls may. But the souls of men can receive no nourishment from ordinary meat and drink, that they should be kept alive, but from that which is spiritual only. It must be spiritual, again, because Jesus Christ describes it as having come down from heaven.

The last conclusion which the Quakers draw from the words of our Saviour on this occasion is, that a spiritual participation of the body and blood of Christ is such an essential of Christianity, that no person who does not partake of them can be considered to be a Christian; for, except a man eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, he has no life in him."

The Quakers, therefore, believe that this address of Jesus Christ to his followers, near Capernaum, relates wholly to the necessity of the souls of men being fed and nourished by that food which they are alone capable of receiving; namely, that which is of a spiritual nature, and which comes from above. This food is the Spirit of God, or, in the


[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

self says,

any man hear

[ocr errors]

language of the Quakers, it is Christ. It is that celestial Principle which gives light and life to as many as receive it and believe in it. It is that spiritual Principle which was in the beginning of the world, and which afterwards took flesh. And those who receive it are spiritually nourished by it, and may be said to sup with Christ; for he him

« Behold I stand at the door and knock. If

voice and

open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me *.

This Supper, which Jesus Christ enjoins, is that heavenly manna on which the Patriarchs feasted before his appearance in the flesh, and by which their inward man became nourished, so that some of them were said to have walked with God; for these, according to St. Paul, “ did all eat the same spiritual meat, and did all drink the same spiritual drink; for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ t.”

This Supper is also “ that daily bread,” ” since his appearance in the flesh; or, as the * Rev. iii. 20.

t i Cor. X. 3, 4.




old Latin translation has it, it is that supersubstantial bread, which Christians are desired to pray for in the Lord's Prayer; that bread which, according to good commentators, is above all substance and above all created things : for this bread fills and satisfies. By extinguishing all carnal desires, it leaves neither hunger nor thirst after worldly things. It redeems from the pollutions of sin. It so quickens, as to raise from death to life; and it gives therefore to man a sort of new and divine nature, so that he can dwell in Christ and Christ in him.

This Supper, which consists of this man-, na, or bread, or of this flesh and blood, may be enjoyed by Christians in' various ways. It may be enjoyed by them in pious meditations on the Divine Being, in which the soul of man may have communion with the Spirit of God, so that every meditation may afford it a salutary supper, or a celestial feast. It may be enjoyed by them when they wait" upon God in silence, or retire into the light of the Lord, and receive those divine impressions which quicken and spiritualize the internal man. It may be en


[ocr errors]

joyed by them in all their several acts of obedience to the words and doctrines of our Saviour. Thus may men every day, nay every hour, keep a communion at the Lord's table, or communicate, or sup, with Christ.


The question then is, Whether Jesus Christ insti

luted any new Supper, distinct from that of the Passover (and which was to render null and void that enjoined at Capernaum), to be observed as a ceremonial by Christians ?-Quakers say that no such institution can be collected from the accounts of Matthew, or of Mark, or of John the silence of the latter peculiarly impressive in the present


It appears then that there are two Suppers recorded in the Scriptures; the one enjoined by Moses, and the other by Jesus Christ.

The first of these was of a ceremonial nature, and was confined exclusively to the Jews; for to Gentile converts, who knew

nothing nothing of Moses, or whose aneestors were not concerned in the deliverance from Egyptian bondage, it could have had no meaning

2 D2

The latter was of a spiritual nature. It was not limited to any nation. It had been enjoyed by many of the Patriarchs. Many of the Gentiles had enjoyed it also. But it was essentially necessary for all Christians.

Now the question is, Whether Jesus Christ, when he celebrated the Passover, instituted any new Supper distinct from that of the Passover, and which was to render null and void (as it is the tendency of ceremonials to do) that which he enjoined at Capernaum, to be observed as an ordinance by the Christian world } The Quakers are of opinion that no institution of this kind can be collected from Matthew, Mark, or John. St. Matthew* mentions the celebration of the Passover-supper in the following manner : “And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave to his disciples, and said, Take, eat, this is my body.

* Matth. xxvi. 26.


« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »