The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 79
Стр. 30
... decision of the Court of Claims in Cors v . United States , 75 F.Supp . 235 , 110 Ct.Cl. 66 , gave direct support to the fears and conclusions of the Shipping Administration . Not until the reversal of this decision in June , 1949 , in ...
... decision of the Court of Claims in Cors v . United States , 75 F.Supp . 235 , 110 Ct.Cl. 66 , gave direct support to the fears and conclusions of the Shipping Administration . Not until the reversal of this decision in June , 1949 , in ...
Стр. 426
... decision is not ob- viously in error no reason is seen for alter- ing such decision now . " With respect to proposed count I ( which became count 2 ) it was argued on behalf of Simpson : " It is not understood how the disclosure of ...
... decision is not ob- viously in error no reason is seen for alter- ing such decision now . " With respect to proposed count I ( which became count 2 ) it was argued on behalf of Simpson : " It is not understood how the disclosure of ...
Стр. 430
... decision as to count 1 be sustained , it would follow that its decision as to counts 3 , 4 , and 5 like- wise should be sustained . The latter would not necessarily be true of counts 2 and 6 , however , because each of those has a fea ...
... decision as to count 1 be sustained , it would follow that its decision as to counts 3 , 4 , and 5 like- wise should be sustained . The latter would not necessarily be true of counts 2 and 6 , however , because each of those has a fea ...
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 9 |
Judges VII | 9 |
Admiralty Rules XLVII | 9 |
Авторские права | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed agreement alleged allowed amended amount appellee application authority Board brief cause charge Circuit Judge Cite as 191 City claim Commission complaint considered constitute contention contract corporation counsel count Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determined direct discharge District Court effect employees entered entitled error evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed follows further granted held insured interest involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor matter means ment motion negligence notice officers operation opinion parties patent payment period person petition plaintiff position practice present prior proceedings question reason received record refused Relations respect result reversed rule S.Ct statute suit testimony tion trial court union United violation Washington witness York