The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 68
Стр. 383
... statute of limitations was applicable . D.C. Code 1940 , §§ 12-201 , 12-205 . 2. Limitation of Actions 2 ( 1 ) District of Columbia statute of limita- tions governed actions for enforcement in District of Columbia , of claim for $ 6,000 ...
... statute of limitations was applicable . D.C. Code 1940 , §§ 12-201 , 12-205 . 2. Limitation of Actions 2 ( 1 ) District of Columbia statute of limita- tions governed actions for enforcement in District of Columbia , of claim for $ 6,000 ...
Стр. 395
... statutes , a declaration of illegality applies only to transactions occurring after the pas- sage of the statute . So this statute should apply to acts of acquisition occurring after its passage . I have no trouble with that proposition ...
... statutes , a declaration of illegality applies only to transactions occurring after the pas- sage of the statute . So this statute should apply to acts of acquisition occurring after its passage . I have no trouble with that proposition ...
Стр. 432
... statute ; the statute told him that the court would order that he be given specific notice of the time to file his claims . Was it not reasonable for him to wait to file until he received such a notice ? Why , then , call him negligent ...
... statute ; the statute told him that the court would order that he be given specific notice of the time to file his claims . Was it not reasonable for him to wait to file until he received such a notice ? Why , then , call him negligent ...
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 8 |
Judges VII | 8 |
Supreme Court Rules XLVII | 8 |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellee application authority automobile Board brief cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claims Commission Commissioner Company considered contention contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determine direct dismissed District Court easement effect employees entered established evidence fact Federal filed finding follows further granted ground held holding income insured interest invention involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor limited matter means ment motion names notice Office operation opinion parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff present prior proceeding purchase question reasonable received record Relations respect result rule S.Ct statute suit tion trial Union United United States Court Washington witness York