The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 74
Стр. 348
39 C.C.P.A. ( Patents ) KRUGER v . RESNICK . Patent Appeal No. 5853 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . May 28 , 1952 . Patent interference proceedings between Ernest A. Kruger , junior party , and Joseph Y. Resnick ...
39 C.C.P.A. ( Patents ) KRUGER v . RESNICK . Patent Appeal No. 5853 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . May 28 , 1952 . Patent interference proceedings between Ernest A. Kruger , junior party , and Joseph Y. Resnick ...
Стр. 356
... Patents 101 ( 8 ) If claims for patent fail adequately to define what new and unobvious results his disclosed device will produce by proper limitations , they are not allowable even though the device as disclosed would sup- port the ...
... Patents 101 ( 8 ) If claims for patent fail adequately to define what new and unobvious results his disclosed device will produce by proper limitations , they are not allowable even though the device as disclosed would sup- port the ...
Стр. 1107
... patent was granted , would stand where not unreasonable on evi- and a defense to action for tort for making , using ... patented design PATENTS 1107.
... patent was granted , would stand where not unreasonable on evi- and a defense to action for tort for making , using ... patented design PATENTS 1107.
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 8 |
Judges VII | 8 |
Supreme Court Rules XLVII | 8 |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed Air Freight alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Aruba Asst automobile Board cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claims Commission Commissioner Company complaint contract Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages Deauville decision defendant defendant's denied dismissed District Court Elekta employees evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed finding granted held income insured interest Internal Revenue issue judgment June June 25 jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Lanham Act lease liability ment motion negligence operation opinion parties patent payment pen points petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding purchase question railroad reasonable record rule S.Ct Section Stat statute suit supra taxpayer testimony tion trade-mark trial court trust U. S. Atty United States Attorney United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York York City