The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 74
Стр. 348
39 C.C.P.A. ( Patents ) KRUGER v . RESNICK . Patent Appeal No. 5853 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . May 28 , 1952 . Patent interference proceedings between Ernest A. Kruger , junior party , and Joseph Y. Resnick ...
39 C.C.P.A. ( Patents ) KRUGER v . RESNICK . Patent Appeal No. 5853 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . May 28 , 1952 . Patent interference proceedings between Ernest A. Kruger , junior party , and Joseph Y. Resnick ...
Стр. 356
... Patents 101 ( 8 ) If claims for patent fail adequately to define what new and unobvious results his disclosed device will produce by proper limitations , they are not allowable even though the device as disclosed would sup- port the ...
... Patents 101 ( 8 ) If claims for patent fail adequately to define what new and unobvious results his disclosed device will produce by proper limitations , they are not allowable even though the device as disclosed would sup- port the ...
Стр. 1107
... patent was granted , would stand where not unreasonable on evi- dence and not clearly erroneous . 35 U.S.C.A. § 64 ... patented design PATENTS 1107.
... patent was granted , would stand where not unreasonable on evi- dence and not clearly erroneous . 35 U.S.C.A. § 64 ... patented design PATENTS 1107.
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 8 |
Judges VII | 8 |
Supreme Court Rules XLVII | 8 |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellee application authority automobile Board brief cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claims Commission Commissioner Company considered contention contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determine direct dismissed District Court easement effect employees entered established evidence fact Federal filed finding follows further granted ground held holding income insured interest invention involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor limited matter means ment motion names notice Office operation opinion parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff present prior proceeding purchase question reasonable received record Relations respect result rule S.Ct statute suit tion trial Union United United States Court Washington witness York