The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 73
Стр. 263
... ground of excessive and unreasonable salaries , question for Court of Appeals is whether tax court finding was sustained by substantial evidence or whether it is clearly erroneous . 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) . 2. Internal ...
... ground of excessive and unreasonable salaries , question for Court of Appeals is whether tax court finding was sustained by substantial evidence or whether it is clearly erroneous . 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) . 2. Internal ...
Стр. 269
... ground that it furnished no justification for vacating the sentence . On March 23 , 1950 , the defendant's motion was heard and denied . Whether he was represented by counsel at the hearing , the record does not show . On February 7 ...
... ground that it furnished no justification for vacating the sentence . On March 23 , 1950 , the defendant's motion was heard and denied . Whether he was represented by counsel at the hearing , the record does not show . On February 7 ...
Стр. 927
... ground that he had been deprived of the as- sistance of counsel in violation of the Constitution of the United States . This motion was apparently bottomed on the gen- eral contention that he could not waive his right to be represented ...
... ground that he had been deprived of the as- sistance of counsel in violation of the Constitution of the United States . This motion was apparently bottomed on the gen- eral contention that he could not waive his right to be represented ...
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 8 |
Judges VII | 8 |
Supreme Court Rules XLVII | 8 |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed Air Freight alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Aruba Asst automobile Board cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claims Commission Commissioner Company complaint contract Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages Deauville decision defendant defendant's denied dismissed District Court Elekta employees evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed finding granted held income insured interest Internal Revenue issue judgment June June 25 jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Lanham Act lease liability ment motion negligence operation opinion parties patent payment pen points petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding purchase question railroad reasonable record rule S.Ct Section Stat statute suit supra taxpayer testimony tion trade-mark trial court trust U. S. Atty United States Attorney United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York York City