Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

54

V.

THEY CONCLUDE FOR VIRGINIA.

CHAP. lish bodies. Again, if they should there live and do well, the jealous Spaniard would never suffer them 1617. long, but would displant and overthrow them, as he 1565. did the French in Florida, who were settled further 21. from his richest countries; and the sooner, because

Sept.

they should have none to protect them, and their own strength would be too small to resist so potent an enemy and so near a neighbour.

On the other hand, for Virginia it was objected, that if they lived amongst the English which were there planted, or so near them as to be under their government, they should be in as great danger to be troubled and persecuted for their cause of religion as if they lived in England, and it might be worse; and if they lived too far off, they should neither have succour or defence from them.

And at length the conclusion was, to live in a distinct body by themselves, under the general government of Virginia; and by their friends to sue to His

3

See the account of the massacre of the Huguenots in Florida by the Spaniards, in Bancroft, i. 67-70. Virginia had been colonized by persons belonging to the Church of England, and attached to its ceremonies and institutions. In the orders and instructions for the government of the colony, issued by King James under his sign manual and the privy seal of England, it was specially enjoined that "the word and service of God should be preached and used according to the rites and doctrines of the Church of England." See Stith's Virginia, p. 37, and Chalmers's Annals, p. 15.

• The Virginia Company was established in 1606. On the 10th of April of that year, King James, by letters patent, divided a strip of

be

land, of 100 miles wide, along the
Atlantic coast of North America,
extending from the 34th to the 45th
degree of north latitude-a terri-
tory which then went under the
common name of Virginia
tween two Companies, who were
to colonize it. The First or South-
ern Colony was granted to certain
knights, gentlemen, merchants, and
adventurers of London, who were
to colonize between the 34th and
the 41st degrees. The Second, or
Northern colony, was granted to
persons of like description in Bris-
tol, Exeter, and Plymouth, who
were to plant between the 38th and
the 45th degrees. Each Company
was to be under the government of
a council of thirteen, and neither of
them was to plant a colony within
a hundred miles of a previous settle-

AGENTS ARE SENT TO ENGLAND.

55

V.

Majesty that he would be pleased to grant them free CHAP. liberty, and freedom of religion. And that this may be obtained they were put in good hope by some great 1617. persons of good rank and quality that were made their friends.1

2

Whereupon two were chosen and sent into England, at the charge of the rest, to solicit this matter; who found the Virginia Company very desirous to have them go thither, and willing to grant them a patent, with as ample privileges as they had or could grant to any, and to give them the best furtherance they could ; and some of the chief of the Company doubted not to obtain their suit of the king for liberty in religion, and to have it confirmed under the king's broad seal, according to their desires. But it proved a harder piece of work than they took it for. For although many means were used to bring it about, yet it could not be effected; for

ment made by the other. The Second or Plymouth Company made the unsuccessful attempt in 1607 to establish a colony near the mouth of the Kennebec. The First or London Company was the one to which the agents of the Pilgrims applied, and which seems at this time to have appropriated to itself exclusively the title of the Virginia Company. Douglass, i. 370, 395, Moulton, History of New York, p. 356, and Grahame, i. 188, err in saying that they obtained a grant of land or a promise of a patent, from the Plymouth Company. See the Charter in Stith, App. p. 1, and in Hazard's State Papers, i. 50. 1 Among others, no doubt, Sir Edwin Sandys, Sir Robert Naunton, and Sir John Wolstenholme, as will hereafter be seen.

• Robert Cushman and John Carver, as appears by the letter of Sir Edwin Sandys on page 63. The little that is known of Cushman and

Carver will be found in Belknap, ii.
179, 267.

[ocr errors]

3 Sir Ferdinando Gorges, one of the leaders of the Second or Plymouth Company, says "Before the unhappy controversy happened between those of Virginia and myself, they were forced, through the great charge they had been at, to hearken to any propositions that might give ease and furtherance to so hopeful a business. To that purpose, it was referred to their considerations how necessary it was that means might be used to draw into those enterprises some of those families that had retired themselves into Holland for scruple of conscience, giving them such freedom and liberty as might stand with their likings. This advice being hearkened unto, there were that undertook the putting it in practice, and accordingly brought it to effect so far forth," &c. See Gorges, in Mass. Hist. Coll. xxvi. 73.

56

THE AGENTS RETURN UNSUCCESSFUL.

CHAP. there were divers of good worth labored with the king V. to obtain it, amongst whom was one of his chief 1618. Secretaries; and some other wrought with the Archbishop to give way thereunto. But it proved all in vain. Yet thus far they prevailed in sounding His Majesty's mind, that he would connive at them, and not molest them, provided they carried themselves peaceably. But to allow or tolerate them by his public authority under his seal, they found it would not be granted.3 And this was all that the chief of the Virginia Company, or any other of their best friends, could do in the case. Yet they persuaded them to go on, for they presumed they should not be troubled. And with this answer the messengers returned, and signified what diligence had been used, and to what issue things were come.

But this made a damp in the business, and caused some distraction. For many were afraid that if they should unsettle themselves, put off their estates, and go upon these hopes, it might prove dangerous, and but

1

Winslow, in his Brief Narrative, says that the agents "got Sir Edwin Sandys, a religious gentleman then living, to stir in it, who procured Sir Robert Naunton, then principal Secretary of State to King James to move his Majesty." Sir Robert Naunton was sworn the king's secretary Jan. 8, 1618. He was the author of "Fragmenta Regalia; Observations on the late Queen Elizabeth, her Times and Favorites," "the fruit," as Fuller says, " of his younger years." Belknap, Am. Biog. ii. 170, and Baylies, Memoir of Plymouth Colony, i. 16, err in calling him Norton. See Fuller's Worthies of England, ii. 336 (4to ed.); Birch's Memoirs of Queen Elizabeth, i. 369.

• The See of Canterbury was at this time filled by Dr. George Abbot.

He had been promoted to it from the bishopric of London, April 9, 1611, and on the 24th of June was sworn a member of the Privy Council. See an account of him, not a very favorable one, in Clarendon's History of the Rebellion, book i. under the year 1633, in which he died. He was too mild and tolerant for Clarendon. See also Wood's Athene Oxon. i. 583, and Neal's Puritans, i. 564.

3 The word granted I have restored from Prince, p. 148.

• At the very time this negotiation was pending, King James issued a declaration, (May 24, 1618) in which he required the bishop of Lancashire to constrain all the Puritans within his diocess to conform, or to leave the country. Prince, p. 147.

OTHER AGENTS ARE SENT.

57

V.

a sandy foundation. Yea, it was thought they might CHẠP. better have presumed hereupon, without making any suit at all, than, having made it, to be thus rejected. But 1618. some of the chiefest thought otherwise, and that they might well proceed hereupon, and that the King's Majesty was willing enough to suffer them without molestation, though for other reasons he would not confirm it by any public act; and furthermore, if there was no security in this promise intimated, there would be no greater certainty in a further confirmation of the same. For if afterward there should be a purpose or desire to wrong them, though they had a seal as broad as the house-floor, it would not serve the turn, for there would be means enough found to recall or reverse it. And seeing, therefore, the course is probable, they must rest herein on God's providence, as they had done in other things.

Upon this resolution other messengers 1 were despatched to end with the Virginia Company as well as 1619. they could, and to procure a patent with as good and ample conditions as they might by any good means attain; as also to treat and conclude with such merchants and other friends as had manifested their forwardness to provoke to and adventure in this voyage. For which end they had instructions given them upon what conditions they should proceed with them; or else to conclude nothing without further advice. And here it will be requisite to insert a letter or two that may give light to these proceedings.

Feb.

1 By Mr. Cushman's letter from London of May 8, 1619, inserted on a following page, it appears that these messengers were Mr. Cushman himself and Mr. Brewster; not Mr. Bradford, as Prince says,

page 151. Judge Davis follows
Prince in this error, in his valua-
ble edition of Morton's Memorial,
p. 22. They were not despatched,
it will be seen, till more than a year
after the first agents were sent.

58

CORRESPONDENCE OF THE PILGRIMS

CHAP. A Copy of a Letter from Sir Edwin Sandys, directed to Mr. John Robinson and Mr. William Brewster.2

V.

1617. Nov.

12.

After my hearty salutations, - The agents of your congregation, Robert Cushman and John Carver, have been in communication with divers select gentlemen of His Majesty's Council for Virginia; and by the writing of seven articles, subscribed with your names, have given them that good degree of satisfaction which hath carried them on with a resolution to set forward your desire in the best sort that may be for your own and the public good; divers particulars whereof we leave to their faithful report, having carried themselves here with that good discretion as is both to their own and their credit from whom they came. And whereas, being to treat for a multitude of people, they have requested further time to confer with them that are to be interested in this action about the several particulars which in the prosecution thereof will fall out considerable, it hath been very willingly assented unto; and so they do now return unto you. If therefore it may

6

1 This name is spelt Sands in the MS., which Stith says is "certainly wrong." See the Appendix to his History, p. 10, Note.

2 This letter is contained in Hubbard's History of New England, in Mass. Hist. Coll. xv. 46, but very incorrectly transcribed. Prince says, in his Annals, pp. xxi. 232, that Hubbard "had never seen Gov. Bradford's History." But this I think a mistake, since Hubbard relates the whole history of this negotiation with the Virginia Company, which is not contained in Morton's Memorial, and which he could have got only from Bradford's original MS. or from Morton's copy of it in the records of the Plymouth Church. He gives passages of considerable

length which agree almost word for word with Bradford's History. Compare Hubbard, pp. 44 50.

3 These were the agents that were first sent. See page 55.

4 The word subscribed is inserted from Prince, p. 142, and Hubbard, p. 46.

5 I substitute whom for whence, on the authority of Prince, p. 142. From the expression "they do now return unto you," it is evident that the agents must have returned to Leyden soon after this letter was written, of which they were undoubtedly the bearers, that is between Nov. 12, the date of the letter, and Dec. 15, the date of Robinson and Brewster's answer to it. Of course Prince, p. 148, and Davis

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »