A Cloud Across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash Between Chinese and Western Political Theories Today

Передняя обложка
Chinese University Press, 2005 - Всего страниц: 816
This book uncovers the basic contradictions between contemporary China's complex ideological marketplace and Western liberalism. It describes and puts into critical context three versions of Western liberalism (those of F. A. Hayek, John Rawls, and John Dunn), three versions of Chinese liberalism (those of Yang Kuo-shu, Li Qiang, and Ambrose Y.C. King), two versions of modern Confucian humanism (those of T'ang Ch, n-i, and Henry K.H. Woo), and various versions of Chinese Marxism, including Kao Li-k'o's in the early 1990s and some of the recent New Left writings. It shows that all these Chinese political theories, not only Chinese Marxism, depend on a number of premises at odds with Western liberalism, especially epistemological optimism and an extravagantly optimistic concept of political practicability. It also argues that not only these Chinese theories but also Western liberalism have failed to offer adequate normative guidelines for the improvement of political life. This study combines a deep understanding of the history of Chinese thought with a strong grasp of modern philosophical trends and an innovative methodology for the description and criticism of political theories. It will be useful to students of modern Chinese intellectual history, of political philosophy, of political culture, of the comparative study of cultures, and of U.S.-Chinese relations.
 

Содержание

The Search
1
Political Theories as Criticizable Discourses
67
Discourses
132
West
145
Tang Chünis Rejection of Western
185
Tangs Philosophical
226
The Nature of Reason and the Objects
235
f The Rational Analysis of Praxis and the Problem
253
Hayeks Threefold Normative Order
585
Hayeks View of History as a Struggle between Correct and Incorrect Reasoning
592
Hayeks Utopianism and Belief in Transformation
596
Conclusion
598
Endnotes
603
What Is a Rational Political Theory? A Critique
607
The Problem of Rationality in the Design of Political Theories
614
The Epistemological Demotion of Normative Ideas
622

Endnotes
278
H K H
291
Maos Vision
333
4
347
Kaos Thought in the Late 1990s
362
An Outline of Lis Book
388
The Problem of Ontological Individualism
394
6
407
Taiwans Utopian Liberalism on the Eve
431
A Critique
503
The Problems of Precision and Opacity in
516
Describing or Defining the Nature
538
The Universal Nature of Human Nature and of Politics
539
The Lack of Progress in History
545
The Question of Agency
554
Political Rationality and the Search for the Right Questions
555
Endnotes
565
A Critique
569
Hayeks Epistemological Optimism
574
Hayeks Teleological Conceptualization of History
578
Rawls and the Initial Questions
625
Rawlss Popperian Typology of Ideas and the Problem of Culturallyrooted Discourses
629
The Problem of the Exercise Needed to Clarify Normative Ideas
638
Rawlss Way of Privileging Ideas
641
Reasonableness as Justice
643
The Original Position and Reasonable Pluralism
648
Juxtaposing Rawlss Concept of Political Rationality with an Alternative
651
The Irrepressible Reappearance of Epistemological
658
Western Philosophy on the Defensive?
671
Endnote
678
The Problem of a Persisting Discourse
694
Do Tang
719
Rortys Philosophy
729
Rorty in Western and Chinese Critical Perspective
735
The Failure of Philosophy East and West
758
Endnotes
764
Discourse 1 and the Chinese Conceptualization
769
Glossary and Index
793
Авторские права

Другие издания - Просмотреть все

Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения

Об авторе (2005)

Thomas A. Metzger is a senior fellow of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and professor emeritus of the University of California, San Diego and has held visiting professorships at National Taiwan Normal University, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, East China Normal University, Wuhan University, Peking University, and the Chinese Academy of Social Science. In 2001 he was appointed advisor to the Department of History, Tsinghua University.

Библиографические данные