Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1888, by L. K. STROUSE & CO., In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. 08-5-46 ZW. Узамора TABLE OF CASES. PAGE. Act to Regulate Commerce Alabama Great Southern R'y Co. et al., George Rice v. 660 503 Baltimore and Ohio R. R. Co., Riddle, Dean & Co. v. 372 608 Commerce v. Boston and Albany R. R. Co. v. Boston and Lowell R. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Lake Shore and Mich- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. New York Central and Hudson River R. R. Co.. 436 Boston and Lowell R. R. Co. et al., Boston and Albany Boston and Lowell R. R. Co. et al., Vermont State Burton Stock Car Co. v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Cape Girardeau and Southwestern R'y Co., Missouri Cases and Proceedings before the Commission, Rules Cases at issue. In re procedure in Chicago and Alton R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co. Chicago and Alton R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. Chicago, Burlington and Northern R. R. Co. et al., La Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v. Chicago and Grand Trunk R'y Co., Louis Larrison v. PAGE. 30 Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v. Chicago and Northwestern R'y Co. et al., La Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. R. Co. v. New York Central and Hudson River R. R. Co. Chicago, Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha R. R. Co., Chicago, Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha R. R.Co., Columbus and Western R'y. In re the tariffs of Delaware and Hudson Canal Co. et al., Ralph W. Thatcher v... Disabled Soldiers and Sailors, In re PAGE. 152 28 East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R'y Co., James 465 East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R'y Co., W. B. 480 East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R'y Co. et al., 495 Evans, Milton v. Oregon Railway and Navigation Co. Export Trade of Boston, In re Farrar, W. B. & Co. v. East Tennessee, Virginia and Fish and Fisheries, In re United States Commission of 21 104 Gardner G. Clinton, Receiver, et al., Thos. J. Rey Harding, F. D. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Harwell, W. O. et al. v. Columbus and Western R. R. Heck and Petree v. East Tennessee, Virginia and Geor Holbrook, Wm. M. et al. v. St. Paul, Minneapolis and Illinois Central R'y Co., George Rice v. Illinois Central R'y Co. et al., George Rice v. 102 Jackson, George M. v. St. Louis, Arkansas and Texas PAGE. 184 657 5 225 Keith, Chas. W., et al., v. Kentucky Central R. R. Co. Kentucky Central R. R. Co. et al., Chas. W. Keith et al. v. La Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v. Chi- Larrison, Louis, v. Chicago and Grand Trunk R'y Co. 189 189 495 629 436 147 185 Louisville and Nashville R. R. Co., In re Petition of Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union of Mankato v. Minneapolis and Saint Louis R'y Co. et al. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. Chicago and Grand Trunk R'y Co. 147 Minneapolis and Saint Louis R. R. Co. et al., Manufac turers' and Jobbers' Union, &c., v. 227 Mississippi and Tennessee R. R. Co., George Rice v. 503 Girardeau and Southwestern R'y Co. . 30 of Saint Louis v. 156 Mobile and Ohio R. R. Co., George Rice v. Newport News and Mississippi Valley Co. et al., George Rice v. 503 |