The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 74
Стр. 292
... practice . No actual reduction to practice of the invention set forth in limited count 2 was claimed by ap- pellee and he was accordingly restricted to the filing date of his individual appli- cation for a constructive reduction to ...
... practice . No actual reduction to practice of the invention set forth in limited count 2 was claimed by ap- pellee and he was accordingly restricted to the filing date of his individual appli- cation for a constructive reduction to ...
Стр. 811
... practice as an attorney in Ordinance contains no. * * * " Q. It would not be proper to ask the court to determine whether you should file an action in the United States - what I am asking you is : is it your intention to con- tinue to do ...
... practice as an attorney in Ordinance contains no. * * * " Q. It would not be proper to ask the court to determine whether you should file an action in the United States - what I am asking you is : is it your intention to con- tinue to do ...
Стр. 1027
... practice . - Cislak v . Wagner , 215 F.2d 275 . Cust . & Pat.App . Junior party , who con- ceded prior date for conception and construct- ive reduction of alleged invention to practice to senior party , thereby assumed burden of proving ...
... practice . - Cislak v . Wagner , 215 F.2d 275 . Cust . & Pat.App . Junior party , who con- ceded prior date for conception and construct- ive reduction of alleged invention to practice to senior party , thereby assumed burden of proving ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
9 Cir action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst Attorney Bankruptcy carrier cars cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 215 claim claimant cold cathode Commission Commissioner constitute contract conviction corporation counsel count Court of Appeals Criminal Law decision defendant defendant's dence denied District Court Eminent Domain employees entitled evidence excess profits taxes F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed finding held hot cathode indictment interest Internal Revenue issue judgment jurisdiction jury L.Ed Labor Relations Board liability ment motion National Labor Relations operation opinion owner parties patent petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding pyridine question reason record reduction to practice remanded rule S.Ct Section Stat statute summary judgment supra taxpayer testified testimony tion trial court trial judge trustee U. S. Atty United States Court United States District violation witness York