The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 80
Стр. 502
... ( Patents ) WEST KEY NUMBER SYSTEM Application of GARTNER et al . Patent Appeal No. 6124 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . June 28 , 1955 . 4. Patents 113 ( 6 ) Court of Customs and Patent Appeals would not disturb ruling ...
... ( Patents ) WEST KEY NUMBER SYSTEM Application of GARTNER et al . Patent Appeal No. 6124 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . June 28 , 1955 . 4. Patents 113 ( 6 ) Court of Customs and Patent Appeals would not disturb ruling ...
Стр. 943
... Patent Appeals . July 1 , 1955 . Patent interference proceeding . The Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office , Interference Nos . 82,262 and 82,555 , awarded priority of invention to party which it found to ...
... Patent Appeals . July 1 , 1955 . Patent interference proceeding . The Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office , Interference Nos . 82,262 and 82,555 , awarded priority of invention to party which it found to ...
Стр. 1029
... patent interference proceeding , prior judgment rendered in ex parte civil action in federal district court determining status of alleged holder of prior rights to patent ... Patent 2,345,849 , for a replaceable filter element PATENTS 1029.
... patent interference proceeding , prior judgment rendered in ex parte civil action in federal district court determining status of alleged holder of prior rights to patent ... Patent 2,345,849 , for a replaceable filter element PATENTS 1029.
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Atty bank basis Board brief cause charge Chief Circuit Judge Cite as 223 claim clear Commissioner Communist Company considered constitutional contract Control conviction corporation counsel Court of Appeals Criminal damages decision defendant denied determination directed District Court effect employee error evidence fact failed Federal filed finding follows further Government ground held income injuries interest Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Code involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed limited mark material matter means ment motion negligence objection officers operation opinion organization Party patent payment person plaintiff present prior proceeding question reason received record reference registration Relations respect result rule S.Ct says specific Stat statement statute sufficient sustained testimony tion trial Union United witness