The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1955 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 81
Стр. 288
... claims 18 and 19 as unduly broad and functional . In this respect , he said that the above italicized portion of claim 18 " is not regarded as a process step but rather a statement of the result expected to be obtained by the step of ...
... claims 18 and 19 as unduly broad and functional . In this respect , he said that the above italicized portion of claim 18 " is not regarded as a process step but rather a statement of the result expected to be obtained by the step of ...
Стр. 289
... claim is objectionable , Gen- eral Electric Co. v . Wabash Appliance Corp. , 304 U.S. 364 , 58 S.Ct. 899 , 82 L. Ed . 1402 , since the inventor is claiming what is old in the non - functional por- tion of the claim and merely claiming a ...
... claim is objectionable , Gen- eral Electric Co. v . Wabash Appliance Corp. , 304 U.S. 364 , 58 S.Ct. 899 , 82 L. Ed . 1402 , since the inventor is claiming what is old in the non - functional por- tion of the claim and merely claiming a ...
Стр. 505
... claim 1 , which is considered allowable , is limited to an oscillation of the bundle itself , whereas claim 7 calls merely for relative vibratory movement between the bundle and sleeve . We accordingly hold that claim 7 fails to define ...
... claim 1 , which is considered allowable , is limited to an oscillation of the bundle itself , whereas claim 7 calls merely for relative vibratory movement between the bundle and sleeve . We accordingly hold that claim 7 fails to define ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Atty bank basis Board brief cause charge Chief Circuit Judge Cite as 223 claim clear Commissioner Communist Company considered constitutional contract Control conviction corporation counsel Court of Appeals Criminal damages decision defendant denied determination directed District Court effect employee error evidence fact failed Federal filed finding follows further Government ground held income injuries interest Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Code involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed limited mark material matter means ment motion negligence objection officers operation opinion organization Party patent payment person plaintiff present prior proceeding question reason received record reference registration Relations respect result rule S.Ct says specific Stat statement statute sufficient sustained testimony tion trial Union United witness