The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1963 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 71
Стр. 840
... opinion , nine month period began to run from date of filing of mandate and opinion with Dis- trict Court rather than date on which opinion was filed with clerk of Court of Appeals . Affirmed . 1. Habeas Corpus 109 In face of remand to ...
... opinion , nine month period began to run from date of filing of mandate and opinion with Dis- trict Court rather than date on which opinion was filed with clerk of Court of Appeals . Affirmed . 1. Habeas Corpus 109 In face of remand to ...
Стр. 841
... opinion . Bailey v . Henslee , 8 Cir . , 1961 , 287 F.2d 936 , 938-939 . It needs no repetition here . By that last opinion a panel of this court reached the conclusion that the district court's denial of Bailey's third application for ...
... opinion . Bailey v . Henslee , 8 Cir . , 1961 , 287 F.2d 936 , 938-939 . It needs no repetition here . By that last opinion a panel of this court reached the conclusion that the district court's denial of Bailey's third application for ...
Стр. 844
... opinion could not operate to com- mand any legal action in the proceedings until it ripened into a judgment formally communicated to the district court . It then follows , it seems to us , that the nine month period ran only from the ...
... opinion could not operate to com- mand any legal action in the proceedings until it ripened into a judgment formally communicated to the district court . It then follows , it seems to us , that the nine month period ran only from the ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action Affirmed alleged amended appellant appellant's appellee application assets Asst attorney bankrupt Bankruptcy Board brief charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 309 claim clause Commission Commissioner Company contract conviction corporation counsel count Court of Appeals Criminal Law decision deduction defendant defendant's denied deuterium discharge dismissed District Court District Judge employees entitled evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed held income tax indictment Internal Revenue issue judgment jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed liability ment motion nolo contendere parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding purpose question reasonable record Refugee Relief Act remanded rule S.Ct sentence sion Stat statement statute summary judgment supra Tax Court taxpayer testimony tion trial court truck U. S. Atty union United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York York City