The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1953 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 77
Стр. 200
... present claims here on appeal , as distinguished from the claims in the parent case , and also the prior art patents , include the recitation that " the total sulfur and selenium present in the entire composi- tion " conform to a ...
... present claims here on appeal , as distinguished from the claims in the parent case , and also the prior art patents , include the recitation that " the total sulfur and selenium present in the entire composi- tion " conform to a ...
Стр. 201
... present an invention of the highest order , not anticipated by the prior art or heretofore claimed in the parent ... present ' in the entire composition more 205 F.2d - 13 % than 0.01 % of the sulfur will react with copper at 250 ° C ...
... present an invention of the highest order , not anticipated by the prior art or heretofore claimed in the parent ... present ' in the entire composition more 205 F.2d - 13 % than 0.01 % of the sulfur will react with copper at 250 ° C ...
Стр. 533
... present value , a 7 % basis of earning power must be used , because that is the legal rate of interest in Georgia . Compare Bunch v . McLeskey , 173 Ga . 545 , 161 S.E. 128. So far as we can find , no annuity tables were introduced in ...
... present value , a 7 % basis of earning power must be used , because that is the legal rate of interest in Georgia . Compare Bunch v . McLeskey , 173 Ga . 545 , 161 S.E. 128. So far as we can find , no annuity tables were introduced in ...
Содержание
Judges VII | 19 |
Court of Claims Rules XLVII | 22 |
Text of Opinions 1 | 178 |
Авторские права | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 1
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
9 Cir action affirmed agreement alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst attorney AUGUSTUS N Bradley Field Brian Holland cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 205 City claim Commissioner Company contract Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant defendant's denied directed verdict District Court duty employees entitled evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed finding Freeman Contractors habeas corpus held income tax injuries Internal Revenue issue judgment June jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM Kiewit L.Ed Labor Relations Board liability ment motion National Labor Relations negligence opinion parties patent payment pellant petition petitioner plaintiff prior art proceedings question railroad reason record rehearing remanded rule S.Ct Stat statute stevedoring Stewart-Warner supra Swope Park Tax Court taxpayer testimony tion trade-mark trial court truck U. S. Atty union United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York City