The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1962 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 69
Стр. 198
... Witnesses 319 When court , in interests of justice , calls a witness whom parties have not seen fit to call either party is entitled to im- peach witness by usual methods , includ- ing proof of prior inconsistent state- ments . 5. Witnesses ...
... Witnesses 319 When court , in interests of justice , calls a witness whom parties have not seen fit to call either party is entitled to im- peach witness by usual methods , includ- ing proof of prior inconsistent state- ments . 5. Witnesses ...
Стр. 239
... witness in his own behalf , we think it is clear from those cases that impeachment of a defendant so testify- ing is not limited to cross - examination and that he is subject to impeachment as any other witness would be . In Rea- gan v ...
... witness in his own behalf , we think it is clear from those cases that impeachment of a defendant so testify- ing is not limited to cross - examination and that he is subject to impeachment as any other witness would be . In Rea- gan v ...
Стр. 240
... witness wheth- er he would believe the other on his oath , and to the contrary view expressed in Taylor on Evidence that the opinion of the impeaching witness , as to whether the opposing witness is entitled to be be- lieved on his oath ...
... witness wheth- er he would believe the other on his oath , and to the contrary view expressed in Taylor on Evidence that the opinion of the impeaching witness , as to whether the opposing witness is entitled to be be- lieved on his oath ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed agent agree agreement alleged amended amount appellee application arbitration Atty authority bank basis Board brief cause charge Circuit Judge Cite as 313 City claim Company conclusion considered constitutional contention contract conviction corporation counsel count Court of Appeals Criminal damages decision defendant denied determine direct dismissed District Court effect employees entered error established evidence existing F.Supp fact federal filed finding Fund granted held income interest involved issue judgment jury L.Ed Labor Relations limited matter ment motion operation opinion paid parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff present prior Procedure proceeding question reason received record respect result rule S.Ct statement statute suit supra taxpayer testified testimony tion tort Union United violation Wellington Fund witness York