Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 76
Стр. 168
United States , 1950 , 186 F.2d 120.14 It is hardly necessary to add that we disagree with diffidence from a conclusion that Circuit reachcompensation remedy did not preclude suit by a United States customs inspector against the United ...
United States , 1950 , 186 F.2d 120.14 It is hardly necessary to add that we disagree with diffidence from a conclusion that Circuit reachcompensation remedy did not preclude suit by a United States customs inspector against the United ...
Стр. 519
Indians 27 ( 1 ) In action by the United States to enjoin Navajo Indians from repeated and continuing trespasses on lands of the United States , injunctive relief should not be denied because it is thought that an injunction will not be ...
Indians 27 ( 1 ) In action by the United States to enjoin Navajo Indians from repeated and continuing trespasses on lands of the United States , injunctive relief should not be denied because it is thought that an injunction will not be ...
Стр. 743
True , in United States v . La Franca , 1931 , 282 U.S. 568 , 51 S.Ct. 278 , 75 L.Ed. 551 , the Supreme Court held that a civil action to recover tax penalties under the National Prohibition Act , 27 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq . , was barred ...
True , in United States v . La Franca , 1931 , 282 U.S. 568 , 51 S.Ct. 278 , 75 L.Ed. 551 , the Supreme Court held that a civil action to recover tax penalties under the National Prohibition Act , 27 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq . , was barred ...
Отзывы - Написать отзыв
Не удалось найти ни одного отзыва.
Содержание
Judges VII | 9 |
Admiralty Rules XLVII | 14 |
Text of Opinions 1 | 22 |
Авторские права | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 1
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed agreement alleged allowed amended amount appellee application authority Board brief cause charge Chief Circuit Judge Cite as 191 City claim Commission complaint considered constitute contention contract corporation counsel count Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determined direct discharge District Court effect employees entered entitled error evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed follows further granted held insured interest involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor matter means ment motion negligence notice officers operation opinion parties patent person petition plaintiff position practice present prior proceedings question reason received record reference refused Relations respect result reversed rule S.Ct Stat statute suit testimony tion trial court union United violation Washington witness York