Lyles v. Graves, et al..... Magowan a. C. & O. Ry. Co..... M., H. & E. R. R. Co., et al. v. Graham.. M., H. & E. R. R. Co. v. McDowell, et al.. M., H. & E. R. R. Co and Walton, Wilson Rhodes Co. v. Owens & Williams, et al. . Major's Admr. a. Eblen Mallicoat a. Abram Markham a. Laib, et al..... Meaders a. Mutual Wheel Co. Meriwether v. Quarles, Judge... Meriwether v. Stratton & Terstegge Co.. . Messick v. Kincaid Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Clayton's Admx. Miller v. McLin, et al..... Miller a. Central Ky. Traction Co... Miller v. Wheeler 343 248 110 131 434 584 Morehead a. Driskill, et al. 107 Montenegro-Riehm Music Co. v. Board Edu. of Louisville.. 720 Morgan v. Baker 485 Morris, By, et al. a. Stowe.. . 386 Moss a. Bowman Realty Co. . 103 Mounts, et al. a. Billiter . 97 Mt. Sterling W. L. & I. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Wyalusing, Pa... 376 Mulverhill a. L. & N. R. R. Co...... . 360 776 .141, 738 . 318 409 354 254 608 . 321 781 841 535 248 293 242 729 . 598 Mineral Development Co. v. Craft Moore v. Johnson .... Municipal Light Co. a. City of Newport.. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of Ky. a. City of Louisville. Mutual Wheel Co. v. Meaders. McClintock v. McClintock McCown, et al. v. Langhorne, et al. McCreary a. Geary McDowell, et al. a. M., H. & E. R. R. Co... McGee, Exor. v. Wiessinger, Judge..... McGinnis' Admr. a. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. McKee a. Hall.. McKnight v. Broadway Investment Co.. McLin, et al. a. Miller..... National Council K. & L. of Security v. Wilson, Guardian.. Newport Rolling Mills v. Hall..... Norfolk & Western R. R. Co. a. Blankenship's Admr. Otis Elevator Co. v. Wilson Overstreet v. Commonwealth Owen & Williams, et al. a. M., H. & E. R. R. Co., et al.. .187, 807 422 . 604 608 1 44 817 403 318 577 . 577 680 . 358 .. 260 751, 752 . 676 471 1 715 Patrick & Bohanan a. Emerald Chief Stock Farm. 740 Patterson, et al, a. Harper, et al.. 356 Pence v. City of Danville 683 Pensacola & Atlantic R. R. Co., et al. v. Hilton's Trustee, et al... 553 Pike County v. Sowards, et al...... 37 Poutch, et al. v. National Foundry & Machine Co., et al.. 242 Pullman Co. v. C., N. 0. & T. P. Ry. Co...... 498 Purdom a. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World. 177 Quarles, Judge a. Meriwether 577 Radel Co. v. Borches 506 Randell, et al. a. Robinson, Norton & Co... 45 Reeves' Admr. a. Tennessee Central R. R. Co. 305 Renaker v. Gregg 368 Rice's Admr. a. Big Sandy Ry. Co.. 645 Richardson a. Breckenridge Asphalt Co.... 834 Robertson a. Chicago Life Ins. Co..... 61 Robinson, Norton & Co. v. Randell, et al. 45 Rockport Coal Co. v. Carter, et al. 50 Rogers v. Hazel 333 Rudy, et al. a. Leigh Banana Case Co.. 772 Rupp a. Western Life Indemnity Co... 489 Sackett, et al. a. Burt & Brabb Lumber Co... 232 Sale, et al. v. Smith & Nixon Co., et al. ... 146 Salyer v. Hawkins 487 Samuels, et al. a. Thurman 758 Sanders a. Shinn Glove Co.... 349 Saulsberry v. Cooper's International Union, et al. 170 Sears v. Hull, et al. 745 Settle v. Gibson, et al. 616 Shellman v. Louisville Ry. Co.... 526 Shinn Glove Co. v. Sanders. 349 Shadwick v. Smith 159 Sherrill-Russell & Blow a. Horton 226 Sherrill-Russell Lumber Co., et al. a. Horton. 226 Shute's Exor., et al. a. Bryant.... 268 Sidebottom a. First Nat. Bank of Owenton. 690 Smith a. Shadwick 159 Smith's Gdn., et al. a. Ellis.. 99 Smith & Nixon Co., et al. a. Sale, et al. 146 Smock a. Louisville Ry. Co.. 345 South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry. Co. v. Barr... 549 South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry. Co. a. City of Covington. 326 Sovereign Woodmen of World v. Purdom 177 Sowards, et al. a. Pike County. 37 Spencer, et al. a. Hagins 184 Stacy a. Combs, et al..... 222 Stewart a. Lyons Lumber Co. 653 Stowe v. Morris, By, et al.... 386 Strange, et al. a. Brooks' Exor., et al. . 503 Stratton & Terstegge Co. a. Meriwether. 577 Straight Creek Coal & Coke Co. a. Commonwealth. 790 Straight Creek Coal Co. v. Huddleston's Admr. 94 Stump a. Keathlay. 406 Sullivan v. Sullivan, et al. 48 Syck, et al. a. Hellier, et al.. 762 Tafferty, et al. a. Donacher. 337 Taylor, et al. v. Cook, et al. 215 Taylor, et al. a. Fightmaster, et al. .... 469 Tennessee Cent. R. R. Co. v. Reeves' Admr.. 305 Thurman v. Samuels, et al. ..... 758 Torbitt & Castleman v. Middlesboro Grocery Co. 343 Turner a. Cumberland Valley Land Co..... 252 U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Citizens Nat. Bank of Monticello 285 U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Citizens Nat. Bank of Monticello 810 U, S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McGinnis' Admr.. 781 Upton's Committee v. Bush, et al. ..... 195 Uptons' Committee v. Gaddie, et al.. 281 Vickers a. Case Mill Mfg. Co. 396 Walker v. Fields 380 Walker v. James 646, 647 Watson a. East Tenn. Tel. Co..... 462 Weissinger, Judge a. McGee, Exor. 321 Wells v. Wells' Exor... 467 Western Life Indemnity Co. v. Rupp. 489 Wheele: a. Miller 131 White's Admx., et al. a. C. & 0. Ry. Co., et al., 15 White v. Jouett 197 White v. Kirby, Judge.. 496 Wilhelm's Exor., et al. v. Bains.. 832 Wilhelm v. Louisville Ry. Co.. 196 Williams a. Ill. Cent. R. R. Co... 52 Wilson, Gdn. a. National Council K. & L. of Security. 293 Wilson a. Otis Elevator Co..... 676 Woodman a. Just's Admr., et al. 493 Wren v. Cooksey, et al. 825 DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY JANUARY TERM, 1912 Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad Co., and Walton, Wilson, Rodes Co. v. N. D. Owen, and Williams, Koehler & Barrier. (Decided February 16, 1912.) Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court. 1. Continuance-Motion for–Agreement of Witnesses to be Present. -An affidavit that sets out that the defendant did not obtain subpoenas for certain witness because the witnesses had agreed to be present at the trial, is insufficient. Their depositions should have been taken, or subpoenas, or other proper process had to compel their attendance. 2. Equity-Motion to Transfer to Equity.-A motion to transfer to equity was properly overruled where the issues were merely those of whether there had been negligence, and whether the plaintiff had suffered loss, and if he had, the amount of his damage. 3. Instructions-Servant of Railroad Company.—The appellant railroad company let a construction contract to Walton, Wilson Rodes Company, and the latter company sublet a part of it to Williams, Koehler & Barrier. In an action by Owen against the railroad company for damages resulting to him in floating logs, from the obstruction of a stream, and making the Walton, Wilson, Rodes Company a defendant by an amended petition, the court correctly told the jury in interpreting the contract that the latter was the servant of the railroad company, and that for such damages as were sustained the plaintiff might recover against it and the railroad company. BROWDER & BROWDER, BENJAMIN D. WARFIELD, and CHARLES H. MOORMAN for M. H. & E. R. R. Co. WILLIS & MEREDITH, W. J. ROSS for Owen. HEAVRIN & WOODWARD for Walton, Wilson & Rodes Company. TAYLOR & EAVES for Williams, Koehler & Barrier. |
0 Отзывы Google не подтверждает отзывы, однако проверяет данные и удаляет недостоверную информацию. Написать отзыв |