The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1954 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 77
Стр. 151
... ( Patents ) Application of STANLEY et al . Patent Appeal No. 6010 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . June 24 , 1954 . Proceeding in the matter of the ap- plication for patent for new and useful improvements in methods ...
... ( Patents ) Application of STANLEY et al . Patent Appeal No. 6010 . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . June 24 , 1954 . Proceeding in the matter of the ap- plication for patent for new and useful improvements in methods ...
Стр. 154
... patent , even though the claims may be different in terms . 2. Where the second patent contains a broader claim , more generic in its character than the specific claims of the first patent . 3. Where the second patent covers matter ...
... patent , even though the claims may be different in terms . 2. Where the second patent contains a broader claim , more generic in its character than the specific claims of the first patent . 3. Where the second patent covers matter ...
Стр. 789
... patent law . 3. Printed copies of various patents grant- ed and patent applications therefor from the United States Patent Office were placed in evidence . These were Berkeley patent in suit No. 2,280,626 , application filed November 2 ...
... patent law . 3. Printed copies of various patents grant- ed and patent applications therefor from the United States Patent Office were placed in evidence . These were Berkeley patent in suit No. 2,280,626 , application filed November 2 ...
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |
Table of Cases Reported XVII | |
Admiralty Rules XLV | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed alleged amended amount appellee application Atty authority bank Board brief cause charge Chief Circuit Judge Cite as 214 City claim Columbia Commission Company complaint considered constitute contention contract corporation counsel counts Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determined dismissed District Court effect employees entered evidence fact Federal filed finding follows granted ground held income insured interest involved issue judgment June jurisdiction jury L.Ed Labor limited matter means ment motion negligence operation opinion paid parties patent payment person plaintiff practice present prior proceeding purchase question reasonable received record reference Relations representative respondent result reversed rule S.Ct statement statute suit taxpayer testimony tion trial trust union United United States Court Washington witness York