The editio princeps of the Epistle of Barnabas by archbishop Ussher, as printed ... 1642, and preserved in an imperfect form in the Bodleian library, with a dissertation on that ed. by J.H. BackhouseClarendon Press, 1883 - Всего страниц: 30 |
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
apparently autem Barnabas Bodleian copy burnt cloth College contain copy dicit Division Dominus early Elrington enim entire epiftolæ epiftolam Epistle ergo etiam evidently fact Fell Fell's fire fuiffe funt given hæc Ignatius illis illius illo illum intended inter ipfius Italy iterum letter Library March mentioned mihi mistake nobis noftri Note notices omnes Oxford pieces Polycarp Polycarp and Ignatius portion Preface preserved PRESS printed probable Prolegomena publication published quæ quam quia quibus Quid quis quod quoted refer reprint Salmasius says seems seen sheets Synopsis tanquam Title-page transcript Ussher's edition vobis Voss Voss's αὐτοῦ γὰρ δὲ εἰ εἰς ἐν ἐπὶ ἵνα καὶ κύριος λέγει οἱ ὅτι οὐκ οὖν πάλιν τὰ τὰς τῇ τὴν τῆς Τί τὸ τὸν τοῦ τοὺς τῷ τῶν ὡς
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 207 - Barnabas, The Editio Princeps of the Epistle of, by Archbishop Ussher, as printed at Oxford, AD 1642, and preserved in an imperfect form in the Bodleian Library. With a Dissertation by JH BACKHOUSE, MA Small 4to, 3*.
Стр. 211 - D'Achery. It is also well known that, before the publication of this edition, another had been prepared, partly by Isaac Voss, partly by Archbishop Ussher, and that this was intended to be annexed to the famous edition of Polycarp and Ignatius published by the latter at Oxford 2, an intention, however, which was frustrated by the 1 Menard had begun the preparation of his edition some years before his death (Jan. 21, 1644). The 'Approbatio Doctorum,' inserted in the edition, bears date Nov.
Стр. 221 - In a Convocation held ю March 1644 [ie 1645], certain Doctors and Masters were by the Vicechanc. and Proctors appointed to take care and see that his [Ussher's] Effigies should be engraven on a copper plate, with an Elogium under it, to be prefixed to his Annotations on Ignatius his Epistles, then printing in Oxon.
Стр. 215 - It was evidently never published, but must by some means or other (perhaps having been rescued from the fire) have fallen into the hands of the person to whom we are indebted for the preservation of the Bodleian book. It must of course have been printed in the expectation that the edition would be published in 1643. It is curious to reflect that, if it...
Стр. 225 - Note, which seems to have been mostly ''overlooked, is found on pp. 242, 243 of Ussher's edition of Ignatius. * This copy formerly belonged to Bishop Stillingfleet, who bought it from Ussher's heirs (Smith's Life of Ussher, p. 50) and lent it to Cave. b Zahn seems to be the only editor who refers to it (Prolegomena, p. xliii, note 5), but he does not quote the important word 'jampridem.
Стр. 217 - non modo animum ' (for ' iniquum '), but omits to add that he reads ' ad ' for the following ' et,' which addition is necessary in order to make his text intelligible. It certainly is curious that Fell's last notice corresponds with the last page of the Bodleian copy. This makes it probable that Fell's sheets also ended with p.
Стр. 225 - Two points seem especially worth noting respecting the Barnabas portion : — I. It contains frequent references, both to a manuscript and to printed sheets of the Epistle. The references to pp. 249-270 of the printed sheets agree precisely with the pages in the unique Bodleian copy herewith reprinted, but there are references also to later pages. One may be particularly mentioned, viz. to p. 301, 'sub finem ipsum Epistolae : 2¿ff<TOí, ayÓTTijf rÍKva кш ilpr¡vr¡s.
Стр. 211 - Doctorum,' inserted in the edition, bears date Nov. 30, 1638, and in that or the following year the work was in a sufficiently forward state for a copy to be sent in manuscript to Archbishop Laud. See the Archbishop's interesting letter in reply, bearing date July 31, 1639, and given in both Le Clerc's editions of Cotelerius (1698 and 1724), and thence reprinted by Russel (1746).
Стр. 226 - Oxoniensis vastavit, omnia quoque exemplaria absumsisset, pulcherrimam ejus auctoris editionem jamdiu habuisscmus.' c For these dates see Note ", p. xiv. On this it may be remarked : (1) Voss's account of the fire was apparently derived from Ussher's just quoted, and therefore does not possess any independent value. Apparently there had been no communication between Ussher and Voss since the latter was in England in the spring of 1641. This may be gathered from Ussher's letter to Voss, dated \\ Feb....
Стр. 213 - Note 2I. 10 Ussher (as in his Polycarp and Ignatius) made no division into chapters. Menard made one, which was adopted by Voss (1646). Cotelerius (1672) made a new one, which has since been generally followed. 11 Compare Gebhardt's Prolegomena, p. xxi. Apparently, however, it did not occur to Gebhardt that there may have been gaps in Fell's sheets. More will be said about this hereafter. See note M.