to this court or any member of it, or to the court below, or to other counsel." (Coldwell v. Sanderson, 69 Wis. 52, 28 N. W. 232, 33 N. W. 591, and Heating Co. v. Sloteman, 69 Wis. 398, 34 N. W. 387.)

RULE XXVIII.

A new rule was adopted by this court September 8, 1881 (see 52 Wis., 60 N. W. v.): "At each session of the court for the hearing of calendar causes, only the first six causes assigned will be peremptorily for call on the first day of the session; all of the first twelve causes not disposed of, will be for call on the second day; the first eighteen causes not disposed of, on the third day; and so on to the end of the assignment." Modified August 14, 1894, to eight causes.

RULE XXIX.

A new rule was adopted January 29, 1884 (see 58 Wis.): "Cases on any calendar remaining unargued at the adjournment of the term shall stand continued and be considered as at the head of the next calendar, and shall be heard in their order, as assigned, at the next term, without further notice of argument."

RULE XXX.

A new rule was adopted December 13, 1887 (see 68 Wis.): "In all criminal cases the plaintiff in error shall prepare and serve upon the attorney general, at least ten days before the case is called for argument, a printed or written statement of the points of error relied upon."

RULE XXXI.

It has been adopted as a rule by a long line of decisions that a motion to strike out a pleading as frivolous, in the court below will be treated as a demurrer upon the merits. (Diggle v. Boulden, 48 Wis. 477, 482, 4 N. W. 678; Lerdall v. Insurance Co., 51 Wis. 426, 431, 8 N. W. 280; Magdeburg v. Uihlein, 53 Wis. 166, 10 N. W. 363; Krall v. Libbey, 53 Wis. 295, 10 N. W. 386; Jameson v. Barber, 56 Wis. 640, 14 N. W. 859; Wright v. City of Ft. Howard, 60 Wis. 119, 18 N. W. 750, 50 Am. Rep. 350; Quackenbush v. Railroad Co., 62 Wis. 412, 22 N. W. 519; Hoffman v. Wheelock, 62 Wis. 435, 22 N. W. 713, 716; Hurlbut v. Marshall, 62 Wis. 601, 22 N. W. 852; Guth v. Lubach, 73 Wis. 135, 40 N. W. 681.)

RULE XXXII.

It has been adopted as a rule by a long line of decisions, that when the judgment in

the court below is in excess for a definite amount, the same must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, subject to an option on the plaintiff's part to remit such excess and take judgment for the balance. (Page v. Town of Sumptor, 53 Wis. 653, 11 N. W. 60; Wylie v. Karner, 54 Wis. 599, 12 N. W. 57; Corcoran v. Harran, 55 Wis. 125, 12 N. W. 468; Potts v. Cooley, 56 Wis. 50, 13 N. W. 682; West v. Railway Co., 56 Wis. 324, 14 N. W. 292; Hartung v. Witte, 59 Wis. 288, 18 N. W. 175; Evans v. Foster, 80 Wis. 516, 50 N. W. 410, 14 L. R. A. 117; Waterman v. Railroad Co., 82 Wis. 613, 639, 52 N W. 247, 1136.)

City of Bay City, Michigan Cent. R. v. (Mich.)

Co.

v. (Neb.)

166

638

Crocker v. Huntzicker (Wis.).

232

448

695

90

Estate

917

City of Cedar Rapids v. Rall (Iowa).,
City of Cedar Rapids, Hall v. (Iowa).
City of Centerville, Bailey v. (Iowa)..
City of Des Moines v. Keller (Iowa).
City of Detroit, Beattie v. (Mich.)..
City of Detroit, Case v. (Mich.).
City of Detroit, Hammond v. (Mich.).
City of Detroit, Klass v. (Mich.).
City of Detroit, Nicholson v. (Mich.)..
City of Dubuque, Thoeni v. (Iowa).
City of Duluth, Le Tourneau v. (Minn.).. 529
City of Fargo, Gagnier v. (N. D.).......1030
City of Fargo, Pickton v. (N. D.).
City of Fond du Lac v. Otto's
(Wis.)

967

Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co. (Iowa)... 817

667

366

937

597

168

15

City of Fond du Lac, Devine v. (Wis.).
City of Hastings v. Gillitt (Minn.)..
City of Hastings, Batty v. (Neb.).
City of Independence, Crynes v. (Iowa).

City of Jamestown, Glaspell v. (N. D.)..1023
City of Lincoln, Gallaher v. (Neb.).....
City of Merrill, Byington v. (Wis.).
City of Milwaukee, Anderson v. (Wis.).
City of Milwaukee, Koepke v. (Wis.).
City of Milwaukee, Riesen v. (Wis.)....
City of Missouri Valley, Bridgeman v.
(Iowa)

505

Davenport, R. I. & N. W. R. Co., Diamond Jo Line Steamers v. (Iowa)..

959

26

Davidson, State v. (Wis.).

596

905

Davis v. Hamilton (Minn.).

744

238

594

Davis, Supreme Court, Order of Patricians v. (Mich.)

874

.1069

City of Omaha v. Bowman (Neb.).

521

Davis Gasoline Engine Works Co. v. McHugh (Iowa)

948

Page

Page

932

657

512

621

Dillrance, New Hampshire Sav. Bank v. (Neb.)

653

Decatur v. Simpson (Iowa).
Decker v. Kanous' Estate (Mich.).
Dederick v. Gillespie (Neb.)
Dee, McClure v. (Iowa).
Deering & Co., Faust v. (Neb.).
Defreeze, Atherton v. (Mich.).
De Gooyer, Slagle v. (Iowa).
De Groot v. Wilson (Neb.)..
De Long v. Olsen (Neb.).

Des Moines Ins. Co., Summers v. (Iowa).. 326
Detroit Citizens' St. R. Co., Doty v.
(Mich.)
.1050
Detroit Electric Ry., Adams v. (Mich.)... 634
Detroit Electric Ry., Leach v. (Mich.)... 635
Devine City of Fond du Lac (Wis.). 913
Diamond Jo Line Steamers v. Davenport,
R. I. & N. W. R. Co. (Iowa)..
Dickinson, State v. (Mich.)..

959

Fiala v. Ainsworth (Neb.)

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, Home
Savings & Trust Co. v. (Iowa).
Filer & Stowell Co., Cosgrove v. (Wis.).
Fillmore v. Van Horn (Mich.)..
Finch, Cunningham v. (Neb.).
Finerty V. Supreme Council
Knights of America (Iowa)...
Fiola v. McDonald (Minn.)..

Y.

552

951

681

.1052

....

Fereday. Shesler v. (Iowa)..

.1102

Ferguson, Tolerton & Stetson Co. v. (Minn.) 19 Fetkenhauer v. State (Wis.).

294

Fezler v. Willmar & S. F. R. Co., two cases (Minn.)

746

135

821

220

69

168