Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

My silver feet, like roots, are wreath'd
Into the ground, my wings are sheath'd,
And I can not away.

Of all there seems a second birth;
It is become a heaven on earth,

And Jove is present here.
I feel the godhead; nor will doubt
But he can fill the place throughout,
Whose power is everywhere.

This, this, and only such as this,
The bright Astræa's region is,
Where she would pray to live;
And in the midst of so much gold,
Unbought with grace, or fear unsold,
The law to mortals give.

[Here they dance the Galliards and Corantos. Pallas ascending, and
calling the Poets.]

'Tis now enough; behold you here,

What Jove hath built to be your sphere,

You hither must retire.

And as his bounty gives you cause,
Be ready still without your pause,

To show the world your fire.

Like lights about Astræa's throne,
You here must shine, and all be one,
In fervour and in flame;

That by your union she may grow,
And, you sustaining her, may know
The Age still by her name.

Who vows, against or heat or cold,
To spin your garments of her gold,
That want may touch you never;
And making garlands ev'ry hour,

To write your names in some new flower,
That you may live forever.

Cho. To Jove, to Jove, be all the honours given.

That thankful hearts can raise from earth to heaven.

Beaumont and Fletcher, in the order of our dramatic investigations, next require our attention. The literary partnerships of the drama which we have had occasion, in the course of our remarks, to notice, were generally brief and incidental, being confined to a few scenes, or a single play. In Beaumont and Fletcher, however, we have the interesting spectacle of two young men of exalted genius, of good birth and connections, living together for ten years, and writing in union a series of dramas, passionate, romantic, and comic, thus blending together their genius and their fame in indissoluble connection. Shakspeare was, beyond a doubt, the inspirer of these kindred spirits. They appeared when his genius was in its meridian splendor, and they were completely subdued by its overpowering influence. They reflected its leading characteristics, not as slavish

copyists, but as men of high powers and attainments, proud of borrowing inspiration from a source which they could so well appreciate, and which was at once ennobling and inexhaustible.

FRANCIS BEAUMONT was descended from the ancient family of Beaumont of Grace-Dieu, in Leicestershire, and was born in 1586. His grandfather, John Beaumont, was master of the rolls, and his father, Francis, one of the judges of the common pleas. Having completed his collegiate studies at Cambridge, young Beaumont entered the Inner Temple, London, as a student of law; but his passion for the muses prevented him from making any great proficiency in his legal studies. He married the daughter and coheiress of Sir Henry Isley, of Kent, by whom he had two daughters. The tenor of his brief life was even and uninterrupted, and his death occurred on the sixth of March, 1615, before he had attained the thirtieth year of age. He was buried on the ninth of the same month, at the entrance of St. Benedict's chapel, Westminster Abbey. Thus, in the beautiful language of Hazlitt, was youth, genius, aspiring hope and growing reputation, cut off like a flower in its summer pride, or like the 'lily in its stalk green,' which inclines us to repine at fortune, and almost at nature, that seem to set so little store by their greatest favorites. The life of poets is, or ought to be, if we judge of it from the light it lends to others, a golden drama, full of brightness and sweetness, rapt in Elysium; and it gives one a reluctant pang to see the splendid vision, by which they are attended in their path of glory, fade like a vapor, and their sacred heads laid low in ashes, before the sand of common mortals has half run out.

his

JOHN FLETCHER was of equally distinguished parentage with Beaumont, being the son of Dr. Richard Fletcher, bishop of Bristol, and afterward of Worcester. He was born in Northamptonshire, in 1576, and educated at Bennet College, Cambridge. Though he was ten years older than Beaumont, yet comparatively nothing is known of him from the time at which he left the university, until the thirtieth year of his age, when he seems to have commenced his career of dramatic authorship, conjointly with his youthful and gifted associate. His life was as quiet and as unmarked by striking incidents, as was that of his partner in his early literary labors; and he died of the great plague in 1625, in the fiftieth year of his age. For some reason, not now known, his remains were not honored with a resting-place in Westminster Abbey, but were buried in St. Mary Overy's church, Southwark.

The dramas of Beaumont and Fletcher were fifty-two in number; but as the greater part of them were not published till 1647, it is impossible to ascertain the dates at which they were respectively produced. Dryden remarks that Philaster was the first play that brought them into esteem with the public, though they had previously written two or three others. It is improbable in plot, but highly interesting in character and situations. The

jealousy of Philaster is forced and unnatural; the character of Euphrasia, disguised as Bellario, the page, is a copy from Viola, yet there is something peculiarly delicate in the following account of her hopeless attachment to Philaster:

My father oft would speak

Your worth and virtue; and, as I did grow
More and more apprehensive, I did thirst
To see the man so prais'd, but yet all this
Was but a maiden longing, to be lost
As soon as found; till, sitting in my window,
Printing my thoughts in lawn, I saw a god,
I thought (but it was you) enter our gates.
My blood flew out, and back again as fast
As I had puff'd it forth and suck'd it in
Like breath. Then was I called away in haste
To entertain you. Never was a man
Heav'd from a sheep-cote to a sceptre raised
So high in thoughts as I: you left a kiss
Upon these lips then, which I mean to keep
From you forever. I did hear you talk,
Far above singing! After you were gone
I grew acquainted with my heart, and search'd
What stirr'd it so. Alas! I found it love;

Yet far from lust;

for could I but have lived
In presence of you, I had had my end.
For this I did delude my noble father
With a feigned pilgrimage, and dress'd myself
In habit of a boy; and for I knew

My birth no match for you, I was past hope
Of having you. And, understanding well
That when I made discovery of my sex,
I could not stay with you, I made a vow,

By all the most religious things a maid
Could call together, never to be known,

Whilst there was hope to hide me from men's eyes,

For other than I seem'd, that I might ever

Abide with you: Then sat I by the fount

Where first you took me up.

Philaster had previously described the circumstances under which he found the disguised maiden by the fount, and the description is highly poetical and picturesque :

Hunting the buck,

I found him sitting by a fountain-side,

Of which he borrow'd some to quench his thirst,

And paid the nymph again as much in tears.

A garland lay him by, made by himself,
Of many several flowers, bred in the bay,
Stuck in that mystic order, that the rareness
Delighted me: But ever when he turn'd
His tender eyes upon them he would weep,
As if he meant to make them grow again.
Seeing such pretty helpless innocence

Dwell in his face, I ask'd him all his story.
He told me that his parents gentle died,
Leaving him to the mercy of the fields,
Which gave him roots; and of the crystal springs,
Which did not stop their courses; and the sun,
Which still, he thank'd him, yielded him his light.
Then took he up his garland, and did show
What every flower, as country people hold,
Did signify; and how all, order'd thus,

Express'd his grief: and to my thoughts did read
The prettiest lecture of his country art

That could be wish'd; so that methought I could
Have studied it. I gladly entertain'd him

Who was as glad to follow.

The Maid's Tragedy, supposed to have been written soon after 'Philaster' was produced, is a powerful, but unpleasing drama. The purity of female virtue in Amintor and Aspatia, is well contrasted with the guilty boldness of Evadne; and the rough soldier-like bearing and manly feeling of Melantius, render the selfish sensuality of the king, more hateful and disgusting. Unfortunately, there is much licentiousness in this fine play-whole scenes and dialogues are disfigured by this master vice of these authors. Their dramas are a rank unweeded garden,' which grew only the more disorderly and vicious as it advanced to maturity.

Besides the plays already mentioned, these writers had produced before Beaumont's death, three tragedies, King and no King, Bonduca, and The Laws of Candy; also five comedies, The Woman Hater, The Knight of the Burning Pestle, The Honest Man's Fortune, The Coxcomb, and The Captain. Fletcher afterwards wrote three tragic dramas and nine comedies, the best of which are The Chances, The Spanish Curate, The Beggar's Bush, and Rule a Wife, and Have a Wife. He also wrote an exquisite pastoral drama, The Faithful Shepherdess, which Milton followed pretty closely in the design, and partly in the language and imagery, in his Comus. In The Two Noble Kinsmen, another dramatic production of these joint authors, they are represented to have had the aid of Shakspeare; but as the play is not superior to many other of their performances, the statement is, certainly, not sustained by internal evidence.

To the dramas which Beaumont and Fletcher wrote conjointly, it is impossible to determine what share each took in contriving the plots, and filling up the scenes; but the general impression is, that Beaumont had the greater judgment and the severer taste, and was chiefly employed in retrenching and correcting the luxuriances of Fletcher's wit and fancy. The genius of the former is also said to have leaned more to tragedy than that of the latter. The later works of Fletcher are chiefly of a comic character; and in these the plots are often inartificial and loosely connected, though he is always lively and entertaining. The incidents rapidly succeed each other, and the dialogue is witty, elegant, and amusing. Dryden considered that Fletcher understood and imitated the conversation of gentlemen much better

than Shakspeare, and it was, therefore, that he was much more frequently on the stage; and with regard to this, Hallam remarks, 'We can not deny that the depths of Shakspeare's mind were often unfathomable by an audience; the bow was drawn by a matchless hand, but the shaft went out of sight. All might listen to Fletcher's pleasing, though not profound or vigorous language. His thoughts are noble and tinged with the ideality of romance; his metaphors vivid, though sometimes too forced; he possesses the idiom of English without much pedantry, though in many passages he strains it beyond common use; his versification, though studiously irregular, is often rythmical and sweet; yet we are seldom arrested by striking beauties. Good lines occur on every page, fine ones, rarely. We lay down the volume with a sense of admiration of what we have read, but little of it remains distinctly in the memory.' But notwithstanding this may be a correct view of the subject, still the dramas of Beaumont and Fletcher impress us with a high idea of their powers as poets and dramatists. The vast va

riety and luxuriance of their genius seem to elevate them above Jonson, though they were destitute of his regularity and solidity, and to place them on the borders of the 'magic circle' of Shakspeare. The confidence and buoyancy of youth are visible in all their productions. They had not, like Jonson, tasted of adversity; and they had not the profoundly meditative spirit of their great master, who was cognizant of all human feelings and sympathies. They did not aspire to his more elevated creations, but took as models for their tragedies such of his comedies as the 'Twelfth Night' and 'Winter's Tale.' Life was to them a scene of enjoyment and pleasure, and the exercise of their genius a source of refined delight and ambition. They were gentlemen who wrote for the stage, as gentlemen-had never done before, and have rarely since.

Beaumont and Fletcher 'are,' as Hallam remarks, not much quoted, and do not even afford copious materials to those who cull the beauties of ancient lore.' Their dramas are remarkable for the continuous interest they excite, and pleasure they afford, rather than for startling passages, or isolated beauties. Our extracts, therefore, will be few and comparatively limited :

GRIEF OF ASPATIA FOR THE MARRIAGE OF AMINTOR AND EVADNE. [Evadne, Aspatia, Dula, and other Ladies.]

Evadne. Would thou could'st instill

Some of thy mirth into Aspatia.

Asp. It were a timeless smile should prove my cheek;

It were a fitter hour for me to laugh,

When at the altar the religious priest

Were pacifying the offended powers

With sacrifice, than now. This should have been

My night, and all your hands have been employ'd

In giving me a spotless offering

To young Amintor's bed, as we are now

For you; pardon, Evadne; would my worth

[To Dula.]

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »