The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1946 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 70
Стр. 408
... counts of patent was required to be considered as material in de- termining the right of each of the parties to make the claims constituting the counts in issue . 3. Patents 106 ( 2 ) In patent interference proceeding , in- herency ...
... counts of patent was required to be considered as material in de- termining the right of each of the parties to make the claims constituting the counts in issue . 3. Patents 106 ( 2 ) In patent interference proceeding , in- herency ...
Стр. 409
... counts 1 to 4 , inclusive , 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , and 13 to appellee Wasberg in appeal No. 5159 , and that defined by counts 5 , 6 , 8 , and 10 to appellee Ditchfield in appeal No. 5158 . The interference is between Wasberg's patent No ...
... counts 1 to 4 , inclusive , 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , and 13 to appellee Wasberg in appeal No. 5159 , and that defined by counts 5 , 6 , 8 , and 10 to appellee Ditchfield in appeal No. 5158 . The interference is between Wasberg's patent No ...
Стр. 414
... counts are not lim- ited to any particular use of the product and clearly do not require that it be an ef- fective wetting agent in hard water or in acid solutions . Mikeska , therefore , is en- titled to July 1938 , when the witness ...
... counts are not lim- ited to any particular use of the product and clearly do not require that it be an ef- fective wetting agent in hard water or in acid solutions . Mikeska , therefore , is en- titled to July 1938 , when the witness ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed Alien Enemy Act alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Bankruptcy beneficiary Board certiorari charge Circuit Court Circuit Judges Cite as 155 City claims Code Commissioner Company complaint contract corporation counsel counts Court of Appeals court of equity damages decision defendant denied District Court dividend Emergency Price Control Eminent domain employees entitled evidence fact Federal filed habeas corpus income interference proceeding Internal revenue invention issue judgment jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed land lease maximum prices ment motion mullite negligence operation owner paid pany parties payment Pepsi-Cola petition petitioner plaintiff preferred stock Price Control Act prior art proceeding profits purchase purpose question reason regulation reorganization Revenue Act rule S.Ct sold Stat statute supra Tax Court taxable taxpayer tion trial court trust U.S.C.A.Appendix United verdict violation York City