TABLE

OF THE NAMES OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

A.

Achey et ux. v. Stephens,..
411
Addicks et al., Key et ux. v............................ 521
Akers et al. v. The State,....
Allen v. Hiller......
Allen, Porter v...........
Anderson v. Buchanan et al.,.

484
310

Anderson et al., Moore v.............................................
Anthony, Irwin ▼........................ ........................
Anthony v. Lewis,........
Arnold et al. v. Stanfield,..
Atkinson v. Gwin,........
Atkinson v. Jackson,..........
Atkinson, The State v..............
Avaline, Doe d. Lafontaine et al. v.....

.....

B.

Babcock v. Doe d. Bowman,....
Bailey et al. v. Snyder,...

Barnard et al. v. Flinn, et ux............
Basler v. Nichols,.

Baugher et al., Paul v....

Beard, Zehnor v..........

....................

......

Canal-boat Standart v. Bond,.
Carley, Smith v.........
Carlisle et al. v. Morris,
Carter, Marvin V. ................................................................
Carver v. Chute,
Carver v. Fennimore,.
Chamberlain, The New Albany and
Salem Railroad Co. v.
Chitwood et al., The Board of Comm'rs
&c. V........

.......

Chute, Carver v. ........

City of Logansport v. Dunn et ux.,
Clark, Ostrander v.

....................

Bills et al., Wickersham et al. v.........
Bliss et al., Henderson v..........
Board of Comm'rs, &c. v. Chitwood
et al.,......

*******...........

Clark et al., Reeves et al. v...... Clark et al. v. Trovinger, Board of Comm'rs, &c. v. Kromer....... Coleman v. Dobbins,. Board of Comm'rs, &c., Norton v........ Collins, Maxwell v. ........... Board of Comm'rs, &c., Ricketts et al. v. 452 Collins v. Shaw et al., Boggs v. The State,........ 463 Collins v. The State, Bond, Canal-boat Standart v........ 270 Common Council of Indianapolis et al. Boswell et al. v. The State,..... 499 v. McLean, 197

.............

Conklin v. The State,

193 Conn, Bowman v. ........................ .................. ..................
58 Conner v. Winton,

................

Bowen et al., Doe d. Mitchell v.......
Bowen, Mauzey et ux. v...............................................
Bowman v. Conn,........
Boyd et al. v. Doty et al.,...........
Breeding v. Shinn,.......
Brickley, Wyatt v......

370

Conwell et al. v. The President, &c., of 125 Connersville, 450 Conwell v. Smith,

Brookville and Greensburg Turnpike Co. v. McCarty et al............. 392 Buchanan et al., Anderson v......... 132 Bullock et ux., Langdon v.......................................... 341 Burnett, The Madison and Indianapolis Railroad Co. v............ 1 Burns et al. v. Jenkins et al., 132 Burton et al., Gavin et al. v..........

18

470

C.

339

323 Callow, The New Albany and Salem
876 Railroad Co. v. .................................. ............................
31 Calvert, Crockett v.

409

6

110 109 204

260
501

96

387

100

504 446 43

277 417 69

471

127

270

451

421

462

145

135

278

504

145

378

211

409

334

156

38 516 344

328

458 58

315

358 530

Covington, &c., Plank road Co. v. Ris

tine,....

297
127

..................................................

Crockett v. Calvert,
Cronkhite, Smith v. ...................................................................... 134

Crum, Elmer v. .............
Culley v. Laybrook,
Cully v. Imell,

25
285

456 Hackney v. The State,
Hall et al., Hunt v.
Hall v. The State,

D.

Darnall v. Mullikin et al.,

Dean et al. v. Doe d. Sease's Heirs,....
Dean et al. v. Lyon et al.,
Defrees et al., Wright v. ..................................
Deming v. Ferry et al.,.....
Dibble v. Dibble et al.,.

.............

Dixon v. Hill,.......................
Dobbins, Coleman v........
Doe d. Bowman, Babcock v.......

6

.........

Doe d. Condict et al. v. Herr et al.,...23, 24
Doe d. Lafontaine v. Avaline,.
Doe d. Mitchell v. Bowen et al.,
Doe d. Sease's Heirs, Dean et al. v.
Donahey et al. v. Thomas et al.,.
Doty et al., Boyd et al. v...
Downs, The State v........
Downs, The State v..........
Doyle v. Kiser,
Dugdale v. Ryan,
Dunn et ux., The City of Logansport v. 378

197
475
255 Hill, Dixon v.....
370 Hiller, Allen v. ...

42 Hoagland v. Roe,
297 Hodgson v. Macy,

.....

396 Hollingsworth et al. v. The State,
529 Howell et al., Martin et al. v......
Huckstep v. O'Hair et al.,
Hunt v. Hall et al.,
Hunt, Westfall v.
Hunter, Indiana Central Railroad Co. v.
Hunter, The State v.......
Hutchins v. Hanna,

E.

******

......

Hyatt et al. v. Kirk et al.,

I.

.....

lis, &c., Railroad Co., Graham v. Mayfield et al., Gray, Swofford v.

.....

Elmer v. Crum,
Estep, Larsh v. .....
Evansville, Indianapolis, &c., Railroad
Co., Graham v.

....

....

F.

Fennimore, Carver v.
Perry et al., Deming v.
Fitzpatrick, Victory v.......
Flagg, Fleming v...........
Fleece v. The Indiana, &c., Railroad
Co.,

Fleming v. Flagg,.

Flinn et ux., Barnard et al. v......................... Floyd v. The Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Co.,.......

G.

.......

Gallagher et al., Shaw et al. v.
Gatling v. Robbins,
Gavin et al. v. Burton et al.,
Gibson et al., Muir et al. v................
Graham v. The Evansville, Indianapo-

Griggs v. Seeley,...
Grimes et al., Powell v.
Gwin, Atkinson v. ........

H.

25 287

276

494
215

439

84 336

533

28 293

425

277

343

100

545

...........

Herr et al., Doe d. Condict et al. v....23, 24
Hiatt, Medler v.........

171

Hiatt et al. v. Simpson,

256

High, Neal v.....

325

147

310

275

121

257

501

253

215

174

74

.............

Ham et al., Stratton et al. v.

152 Hampton v. The State,.....
475 Hanna, Hutchins v. .............

.........

..........

Imell, Cully v.

456

135 Indiana, &c., Railroad Co., Fleece v.... 460
418 Indiana Central Railroad Co. v. Hun-
281
ter,
363 Indianapolis, &c., Plankroad Co., Man-

74

sur v.

460 Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad
363 Co. v. Kinney,
204 Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad
Co., Floyd v.
469 Irwin v. Anthony,...
Israel v. The State,

................

264
252

376

......

529

533

178

487

252

184 Jack v. Russey,
69 Jackson, Atkinson v.............
187 Jarboe v. Kepler,
Jarvis v. Strong,
276 Jeffersonville Railroad Co. v. Millet,... 255
487 Jeffrey, McClure v.
79
508 Jenkins et al., Burns et al. v................. 417

180
31
314
284

******

402

469

470

467

Keen v. Younkman,

254 Kepler, Jarboe v............................. 314 Kessler et al., The President, &c., of La

474

368

.........

masco City v......... Key et ux. v. Addicks et al.,....................... 521 Key et al. v. Robinson,............ Kinney, The Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Co. v.. 402 Kirk et al., Hyatt et al. v.................. 178 Kiser, Doyle v........................... ................ ............................................. Kittering v. Parker et al., Knightstown and Shelbyville Railroad

.........................................................

396
44

*******.....

Co. v. Lindsay,...... 278 Kromer, The Board of Comm'rs, &c., v. 446 Kyle v. Malin,.............................

34

L.

Lafayette and Indianapolis Railroad
Co. v. Martin,..

Laiman, The New Albany and Salem
Railroad Co. V............

.........................................................

....................................... ..................................

Langdon v. Bullock et ux.,
Larsh v. Estep,.........
Laybrook, Culley v........................................................................
Lewis, Anthony ▼........................ ...........................
Leyner v. The State,.
Lindsay, The Knightstown and Shel-
byville Railroad Co. v............................
Lockstand, The State v.....................................
Lomax, Marion, &c., Railroad Co. v.... 459
Lovejoy v. Robinson,
Lyon et al., Dean et al. ▼....................................

.....................................

399
71

M.

.......

...... 501

183

462

...................................................................

522 Martin et al. v. Howell et al.,................
262 Martin, The Lafayette and Indianapo-
lis Railroad Co. V.................................................... 251
Marvin v. Carter,......
Mason v. Smith,
Mather et al. v. Sherwood et ux.,...
Matlock v. Strange,
Mauzey et ux. v. Bowen,.
Maxwell v. Collins,

73

.................................................

92

57

193

38

487

.... 392

150 79

...................................................................

281

.......................

328

.......................................

171

...........................................................

118

Mayfield et al., Graham v.
McCarty et al., The Brookville and
Greensburg Turnpike Co. v............
McCarty et al. v. Mewhinney,......... 513
McCarty v. Roberts,..
McClure v. Jeffrey,
McLane, Young v........................... 357
McLaughlin v. The State,.
McLean, The Common Council of In-
dianapolis et al. v......
McLean, Plummer v............................................................ 457
McOnnoughhay, Timmons et al. v...... 483
Medler v. Hiatt,.
Meek v. Spencer et al.,...........
Mewhinney, McCarty et al. v............
Miller v. The State,..
Millet, The Jeffersonville Railroad
Co. v............................. ................................................................
Mills v. Marshall...
Minor et al. v. The State,
Moore v. Anderson et al.,
Morgan v. Squier,..........
Morris, Carlisle et al. v........................ ..............
Muir et al. v. Gibson et al.,.
Muir, Stephens et al. v................................................... 352
Mullikin et al., Darnall v................................................... 152
Murphy, Marnine v......................................................... 272
Murray et al., Riley v..................................................................

513

325

255

54 424 18 511

............................................................

421

187

354

251

212
341

287
285
339

490

278
138

0.

.....................................................

......................................................OD

Macy, Hodgson v.....
Madison and Indianapolis Railroad Co.
v. Burnett,.....
Madison and Indianapolis Railroad Co.
v. The Trustees, &c.,..
Madison and Indianapolis Railroad Co.
. Whiteneck,........
Makepeace et al. v. The State,............
Malett et ux. v. Page et al.,......................
Malin, Kyle v..........
Mansur v. The Indianapolis, &c., Plank-
road Co.,.......
487
Marion, &c., Railroad Co. v. Lomax,... 459
Marion, &c., Railroad Co. et al. v.

........................................................

.....

..................................

Spence et al.,................. 415 Odell et al. v. Jenkins, Marnine v. Murphy,. 272 O'Hair et al., Huckstep ▼..................... ........................... Marshall, Mills ▼................................................ 54 O'Haver et al., The State v............... 282 498 Ostrander v. Clark,..

522 253

********......................... ................

Marshall v. The State,.......

211

825 293

.....................

121

471

277

......

...................

Neal v. High,. Nelson v. Hart et al.,. New Albany and Salem Railroad Co. v. Callow,........ New Albany and Salem Railroad Co. v. Chamberlain,......... ......... ............ 278 New Albany and Salem Railroad Co. v. Laiman,. 212 ..................................................................................... Nicholasv, Heaton,.......................... 343 41 Nichols, Basler v.............................................................. 260 864 Nodwift et al., Roberts v.................. 339 34 Norton v. The Board of Comm'rs, &c., 43

528

217

Payne, Postlethwaite et al. v........... 104

457
60

104

....

S.

Reed v. The State,....... 200 Reese v. The State,....... 416 Reeves et al. v. Clark et al., ......... 409 Ricketts et al. v. The Board of Comm'rs,

Robbins, Gatling v....................................
Roberts, McCarty v................................................
Roberts v. Nodwift et al.,.
Roberts, Tilford v............................ ........................
Robinson, Key et al. v....................................
Robinson, Lovejoy v.
Roe, Hoagland v..
Rogers v. Stephens et al.,
Rogers et al., Turner v.........................................
Rourke v. Rourke,
Russey, Jack v.............................................................................................
Ryan, Dugdale v...................................................................................

..................

Spencer et al., Meek v.......
Spivey v. The State,.....
364 Squier, Morgan v......
44 Stanfield, Arnold et al. v...
501 State, Akers et al. v.........
State v. Atkinson,.................
State, Boggs v...........

................

118

405

511

323

484

409

463

499

344

458

42

297

State v. Downs,.
State, Hall v.....

439

State, Israel v...........

467

State, Hackney v......................... ......... ......... ............

494

State, Hampton v....

336

State v. Hays,......

425

545

257

State, Herman v................
State, Hollingsworth et al. v.....
State v. Hunter,
State, Leyner v....
State v. Lockstand,

529

490

138

........

State, Makepeace et al. V...........................................
State, Marshall v.

41 498

.....................

State, McLaughlin V........................ 281
State, Miller v......
325
State, Minor et al v........................................................... 424
State v. O'Haver et al.,.....................

282

State, Reed v.............

200

254

State, Reese v....

416

368
399

485

............................................

tate, Schneider v... ... ... ....................................................... 410 State, Sloan V....................................................................... 312 275 State v. Smith,.. 464 State, Spivey v....................................................................... 405 139 State, Stipes V................................ 280 427 State v. Swails,. 180 State v. Taylor,.. 529 State v. Vanloan,

524

497

182

1

252

358

474

452
354

297
184

150

339

..........

...................................

State, Boswell et al. v.....................
State, Collins v..............

State, Conklin v..

State v. Downs,.

...

............

...

......................................

State, Walker v......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ..........
State, Weaver v...........
State, Wheeler v...............

................

.....

State v. The Whitewater Valley Canal Schneider v. The State,.......... 410 Co.,......... Seeley, Griggs v............ 264 State v. Williams, Shaw et al., Collins v.............................................. 516 State, Woodruff v............. Shaw et al., v. Gallagher et al.,........... 252 State, Woolley v.. ... ... ... ... ... . Shaw v. Smith,............................. 485 State, Woolley v........ Shaw et al. v. Wood et al.,................ 518 Stephens, Achey et ux. v....... Sherwood et ux., Mather et al. v........ 92 Stephens et al. v. Muir,........................... Shinn, Breeding v......................... 125 Stevens v. Hays,........ Simpson, Hiatt et al. v................... 256 Stevens et al., Rogers ▼.................... Sloan v. The State,.. 312 Stipes v. The State, Smith v. Carley, ... ......... ......... ......... .................. ....... ........ 451 St. John et al v. Harrington et al., Smith, Conwell v.................................................. 530 Strange, Matlock v........ Smith v. Cronkhite,...................... Smith, Mason v.........

.........

.....................

..........................

............................................

134 Stratton et al v. Ham et al.,........
73 Straughan, Watson v............
485 Strickland, Willey v.............
485 Strong, Jarvis v...................................................................
109 Swails, The State v.............. ..... ... ... ... ...
Swafford v. Gray,
508

464 280 28 57 84 474 453 284

524

415