The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1957 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 70
Стр. 358
... prior art and that claims 5 and 7 were not suggest- ed by prior patent and should have been allowed . part Affirmed in part and reversed in 1. Patents 113 ( 6 ) Whether an affidavit filed by appli- cant for patent after an appeal to ...
... prior art and that claims 5 and 7 were not suggest- ed by prior patent and should have been allowed . part Affirmed in part and reversed in 1. Patents 113 ( 6 ) Whether an affidavit filed by appli- cant for patent after an appeal to ...
Стр. 1043
... prior art reference but it is sufficient that prior art disclosures are such that a person skilled in art might read- ily design improvement claimed in patent.- Pleatmaster . Inc. v . J. L. Golding Mfg . Co. , 240 F.2d 894 . Cust ...
... prior art reference but it is sufficient that prior art disclosures are such that a person skilled in art might read- ily design improvement claimed in patent.- Pleatmaster . Inc. v . J. L. Golding Mfg . Co. , 240 F.2d 894 . Cust ...
Стр. 1044
... prior art . - Application of Mason , 240 F.2d 362 . C.A.Md. Cited as prior art.— Brown v . Brock , 240 F.2d 723 . C.A.Cal . Cited . - Hall v . Wright , 240 F.2d 787 . 2,012,734 . C.A.Ill . Cited . - Pleatmaster , Inc. v . J. L. Golding ...
... prior art . - Application of Mason , 240 F.2d 362 . C.A.Md. Cited as prior art.— Brown v . Brock , 240 F.2d 723 . C.A.Cal . Cited . - Hall v . Wright , 240 F.2d 787 . 2,012,734 . C.A.Ill . Cited . - Pleatmaster , Inc. v . J. L. Golding ...
Содержание
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 10 |
Judges VII | 10 |
Supreme Court Rules XLIX | 10 |
Авторские права | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 2
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
action affirmed agree agreement alleged amended amount appellee application authority bank Board brief cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 240 City claim Commission Company considered constitute contention contract conviction corporation counsel count Court of Appeals Criminal decision defendant denied determine directed dismiss District Court duty effect employees entered error evidence fact Federal filed granted ground hearing held hold indictment injuries instructions insured interest Internal involved issue judgment jury L.Ed liability limited material matter meaning ment motion negligence officers operation opinion paid parties payment person plaintiff practice present prior proceeding production question reason received record reference result reversed rule S.Ct Securities Service statement statute suit testimony tion trade trial court union United verdict Washington witness York