District Court's jurisdiction as court of equity to recover preferences is not exclusive.-Id. 288(5) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Summary jurisdiction exists as to property in court's possession. -Autin v. Piske, 24 F. (2d) 626.
(D) Administration of Estate. 224 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Referee's jurisdiction extends only to determining questions of title affecting bankrupt's property, and referee had no jurisdiction of creditor's claim against bankrupt's former partner.-In re Chakos, 24288(6) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Court has jurisdicF. (2d) 482.
tion of suit by trustee to recover property transferred to defraud creditors, and in absence of bona fide adverse claim may exercise it. summarily through referee (Bankr. Act, § 67e [11 USCA § 107]).-Autin v. Piske, 24 F. (2d) 626.
234 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) General order of reference in bankruptcy did not supersede examination before special commissioner previously appointed, at which defendant was charged with testifying falsely (Bankr. Act, §§ 21a, 29b [11288(7) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Referee has jurisUSCA $$ 44, 52]; Cr. Code, § 125 [18 USCA § 231]; General Order 12 of Supreme Court).Magen v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 325.
235 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Special commissioner could be appointed to conduct examination in bankruptcy proceeding at which defendant was charged with testifying falsely (Bankr. Act. §§ 21a, 29b [11 USCA §§ 44, 52]; Cr. Code, § 125 18 USCA § 231]).—Magen v. U. S., 24 F. (2d)
Special commissioner, conducting examination at which defendant was charged with testifying falsely in bankruptcy proceeding, was not required to take oath (Bankr. Act, §§ 21a, 29b [11 USCA §§ 44, 52]; Cr. Code, § 125 [18 USCA § 23z]).-Id.
diction to determine whether adverse claim is colorable or made in good faith.-Autin v. Piske,
288 (8) (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Referee held without power to avoid preferences in summary proceedings on petition filed by receivers before adjudication (Bankr. Act, § 2 [3]; 11 USCA § 11).-Brenner v. Sawyer, 24 F. (2d) 167.
288(14) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Finding by referee that adverse claim to property was colorable only held sustained by evidence.-Autin v. Piske, 24 F. (2d) 626.
290 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Payment to certain creditors of proceeds of bankrupt's sale of goods is of itself no defense to trustee's action for goods or their value (Civ. Code Cal. § 3440; Bankr. Act, § 70e [11 USCA § 110]).—Schainman v. Dean, 24 F. (2d) 475.
Notary may administer oath to special commissioner appointed to conduct examination in bankruptcy proceeding (Bankr. Act, §§ 20, 21a293(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Trustee's suit to [11 USCA §§ 43, 44]).-Id.
255 (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Generally, landlord may recover rent for premises occupied by bankrupt's trustee.-Lerner Stores Corporation v. Electric Maid Bake Shops, 24 F. (2d) 780. Landlord was not entitled to lien on bankrupt tenant's property left on premises after sale, in absence of lease to purchaser (Rev. Civ. Code La. art. 2708).--Id.
255 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Lessor's claim for reasonable value of use of premises by bankruptcy trustee is payable as part of costs of administration, if premises were retained for estate's benefit.-In re Chakos, 24 F. (2d) 482.
255 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) For occupancy by receiver or trustee of premises leased to bankrupt, landlord is entitled to fair rental value, presumptively amount reserved in lease.-In re Nathanson, 24 F.(2d) 760.
267(2) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Landlord, having lien on bankrupt tenant's movable property, subject to prior chattel mortgages, could enforce claim on proceeds after satisfying chattel mortgages. Lerner Stores Corporation v. Electric Maid Bake Shops, 24 F. (2d) 780.
Fixing lienholders' contributions to cost of administration on basis of proportionate shares in proceeds of incumbered property held error (Bankruptcy Act, § 67d [11 USCA § 107]).
267(3) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Landlord, having statutory lien on bankrupt tenant's movable property, is entitled to proceeds on paying what it would otherwise have cost to enforce his lien. -Lerner Stores Corporation v. Electric Maid Bake Shops, 24 F. (2d) 780.
(E) Actions by or Against Trustee. 287(1) (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Trustee may sue at law to recover preferential transfer (Bankr. Act, § 60b [11 USCA § 96(b)]).-Foster v. Zellman, 24 F. (2d) 1002.
287 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Trustee, avoiding transfer violating state Bulk Sales Act, may sue for property or conversion (Bankr. Act. § 70e [11 USCA § 110]; Civ. Code Cal. § 3440). Schainman v. Dean, 24 F. (2d) 475.
287 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Trustee, avoiding transfer violating state Bulk Sales Act, may sue in law or equity (Bankr. Act. § 70e [11 USCA § 110]; Civ. Čode Cal. § 3440).-Schainman v. Dean, 24 F. (28) 475.
287(3) (U.S.D.C.Mass.). Equity side of court may be resorted to for recovery of preferences.-Foster v. Zellman, 24 F. (2d) 1002.
recover collaterals. bought in by bankrupt's pledgee after adjudication, held within jurisdietion of federal District Court (Bankr. Act, §§ 67e, 70 [11 USCA §§ 107, 1101)-State Trust & Savings Bank v. Dunn, 24 F. (2d) 477. Court was required to take jurisdiction and de293(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Federal District cide equities, where bill by trustee stated cause
of action (Bankr. Act, § 67e [11 USCA § 107]). State Trust & Savings Bank v. Dunn, 24 F. (2d) 477.
296 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Jurisdiction of bankruptcy and state court is concurrent.-Schainman v. Dean, 24 F. (2d) 475.
302(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Bill by trustee, alleging title to certain collaterals transferred by bankrupt within the four-months period to defraud creditors, held to state cause of action (Bankr. Act, § 67e [11 USCA § 107]).—State Trust & Savings Bank v. Dunn, 24 F. (2d) 477.
303 (5) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Finding that sale of $4,000 worth of merchandise was "substantial part" of $20,000 to $25,000 stock, within Bulk Sales Act, held warranted (Civ. Code Cal. § 3440). Schainman v. Dean, 24 F. (2d) 475.
303 (5) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Evidence held not to sustain decree that realty title to which was taken in name of bankrupt's wife, was conveyed to defraud bankrupt's creditors (Civ. Code Cal. §§ 164, 168).-In re Laugharn, 24 F. (2d) 508.
303 (5) (U.S.C.C.A.Tenn.) Evidence held to sustain finding of absence of consignor's fraud in action by consignee's trustee in bankruptcy to require return of goods taken by consignor from bankrupt's store.-McCallum v. Bray-Robinson Clothing Co., 24 F. (2d) 35.
305 (U.S.Č.C.A.Tex.) Pledgee, buying in pledged collaterals for amount of debt, held liable to pledgor's trustee in bankruptcy, not notified of sale, for value of collaterals less debt. -State Trust & Savings Bank v. Dunn, 24 F. (2d) 477.
(F) Claims Against and Distribution of Estate.
318(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Rent due on filing petition and damages for breach of lease are allowable as general claims against bankrupt's estate. In re Chakos, 24 F. (2d) 482.
324 (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Mortgagee may collect interest to date of filing petition.-Lerner Stores Corporation v. Electric Maid Bake Shops, 24 F. (2d) 780.
339 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Claimant, obtaining injunction against bankrupt's state court suit
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
to cancel judgment supporting claim, could not assert that objection in bankruptcy court constituted collateral attack on judgment.-In re Rubin, 24 F. (2d) 289.
340 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Exclusion of testi- mony respecting agreement to cancel state court judgment on which claim was based, as collateral attack on judgment, held error.-In re Rubin, 24 F. (2d) 289.
340(4) (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Orders allowing claims held proper under evidence.-In re Ru- bin, 24 F. (2d) 289.
Bankrupt's admission of existence of judgment without alleging payment made out prima facie case for allowance of claim based thereon.-Id. 340(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) Evidence held to warrant finding against existence of agree- ment by bankrupt to pay its officer and di- rector any federal income tax refund obtained by him. Monson v. Hibler, 24 F. (2d) 909.
345 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Mortgagee held not entitled to preference as to attorney's fees.- Lerner Stores Corporation v. Electric Maid Bake Shops, 24 F. (2d) 780.
Priority of liens in bankruptcy is determined by state law. Id.
346 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Provision of Amend- atory Bankruptcy Act 1926 giving wages priority over taxes held applicable to pending case, in which no order for distribution had been made (Amendatory Bankruptcy Act 1926, § 15 [11 USCA § 104]; § 18 [44 Stat. 667]).- City of Chelsea v. Dolan, 24 F. (2d) 522.
346 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Lien for taxes due United States, notice of which was filed prior to recording of trust deed, was prior lien on prop- erty involved on grantor's bankruptcy (26 USCA § 115).-In re F. MacKinnon Mfg. Co., 24 F. (2d) 156.
Trust deed, recorded before filing notice of lien for excise tax due United States, had pri- ority on grantor's bankruptcy (26 USCA § 115). -Id.
350 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Under Wisconsin law, trust deed to bankrupt's property held prior to judgment docketed between execution and re- cording of trust deed. In re F. MacKinnon Mfg. Co., 24 F. (2d) 156.
(G) Accounting and Discharge of Trustee.
372 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) No formal procedure is prescribed or required for reopening an ad- ministration (Bankr. Act [11 USCA]).-Scho- field v. Moriyama, 24 F. (2d) 473.
share in shrinkage from present fair value.-In re Rollins Boot Shop, 24 F. (2d) 422.
Present fair value of bankrupt property from which exemption is claimed is not fixed by orig- inal costs nor general appraisement.-Id."
414(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Objecting credi- tors held to have failed to establish failure to enter sales specified as ground of objection to discharge. In re Feinsilver, 24 F. (2d) 408.
415 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Referee, as spe- cial master, held to have authority to determine that claim of creditor objecting to discharge was duly filed and allowed, but lost from files. -Schofield v. Moriyama, 24 F. (2d) 473.
415(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Denial of dis- charge on ground not covered by specifications held erroneous. In re Feinsilver, 24 F. (2d) 408.
VI. APPEAL AND REVISION OF PRO-
451 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Bankruptcy referee's decision as common-law arbitrator held not within appellate jurisdiction of Circuit Court of Appeals. In re Chakos, 24 F (2d) 482.
457 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Creditor may not ap- peal from order of bankruptcy court, unless trustee fails to do so and court permits.-In re Chakos, 24 F. (2d) 482.
458 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Question not decided by referee or judge is not considered on appeal. -In re Grosse, 24 F. (2d) 305.
467(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) District Court's judgment on facts will not be disturbed unless clearly against weight of evidence or plainly erroneous.-Monson v. Hibler, 24 F. (2d) 909.
VII. COSTS AND FEES.
474 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Mortgagee's share of lien against bankrupt's personalty is chargea- ble only with ratable proportion of expenses of sale and so much else as helped to preserve property or proceeds (amendment of 1910 to Bankruptcy Act, § 48d [11 USCA § 76]). In re Myers, 24 F. (2d) 349, modifying order (D. C.) 19 F. (2d) 600.
474 (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Lessor was not en- titled to have reasonable value of use of prem- ises by bankruptcy trustee, allowed as admin- istration costs, paid from proceeds of mort- gaged personalty.-In re Chakos, 24 F. (2d) 482.
476 (U.S.C.C.A.La.) What constitutes costs of administration is largely discretionary.-Ler- ner Stores Corporation v. Electric Maid Bake
V. RIGHTS, REMEDIES, AND DIS- Shops, 24 F. (2d) 780.
CHARGE OF BANKRUPT.
396(3) (U.S.C.C.A.Pa.) Bankrupt's life in- surance policy, payable to wife, reserving right to change beneficiary, held "for benefit of the wife," within state exemption statute (Pa. St. Supp. 1924, § 10388a).-(D. C.) In re Rose, 24 F. (2d) 253, order affirmed Dussoulas v. Lang, 24 F. (2d) 254.
396(5) (U.S.C.C.A.Ariz.) Bankrupts' filing of homestead claims after adjudication held in- effective to create homestead exemption (Bankr. Act. § 47, as amended in 1910, and § 70a [11 USCA $$ 75, 110] Civ. Code Ariz. 1913, pars. 3288, 3289, 3292).-Georgouses v. Gillen, 24 F. (2d) 292.
396(5) (U.S.C.C.A.Wis.) Occupancy property as homestead determines whether it is exempt as such, and fact that bankrupt moved into property to create homestead is immaterial (St. Wis. 1927, § 272.20).-In re Chakos, 24 F. (2d) 482.
Bankrupt's parol executory contract to sell property claimed as homestead held not to af- fect his right to exemption (St. Wis. 1927, § 272.20).-Id.
400 (3) (U.S.D.C.Ga.) Where homestead exemption of bankrupt in Georgia is allowed in cash from proceeds of property, it must
VIII. OFFENSES AGAINST BANKRUPT LAWS.
494 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Allegation of appoint- ment of special commissioner, before whom de- fendant was charged with testifying falsely in bankruptcy proceeding, held sufficient (Bankr. Act, §§ 21a, 29b [11 USCA §§ 44, 52]; 18 USCA §556; Cr. Code, § 125 [18 USCA § 231]). Magen v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 325.
495 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Evidence held suffi- cient to sustain conviction for falsely testifying in bankruptcy proceeding (Cr. Code, § 125 [18 USCA § 231]; Bankr. Act, § 29b [11 USCA § 52]).-Magen v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 325.
BANKS AND BANKING.
II. BANKING CORPORATIONS AND AS- SOCIATIONS.
(E) Insolvency and Dissolution. 80 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Idaho) On proof that trust funds came into hands of receiver, bank has burden of proving wrongful misappropria- tion or criminal use of funds.-American Surety Co. of New York v. Jackson, 24 F. (2d) 768.
City treasurer will be presumed to have de- posited only cash as bearing on question of aug- mentation of funds.-Id.
80 (7) (U.S.C.C.A.Idaho) City cannot claim any preference as to funds deposited in bank creating relation of debtor and creditor.-Amer- ican Surety Co. of New York v. Jackson, 24 F. (2d) 768.
City may recover deposits made in violation of law from bank's receiver, if not theretofore paid out or dissipated.--Id.
Surety becoming subrogated to rights of city may recover funds unlawfully deposited by city treasurer (Idaho Laws 1921, c. 256, superseding Idaho Laws 1893, p. 111).—Id.
80(7) (U.S.D.C.Idaho) Postal funds depos- ited by postmaster in state bank held "debts due United States," within priority statute__(31 USCA §§ 191, 192; 39 USCA §§ 46-48).-U. S. ex rel. Ray v. Porter, 24 F. (2d) 139.
Closing of bank and taking over control by state officer held voluntary assignment for bene- fit of creditors, and "act of bankruptcy," within priority statute (31 USCA § 191).-Id.
Right of United States to priority of its debts in case of insolvency cannot be governed by state laws (31 USCA § 191).—Id.
Closing of bank by majority of directors and liquidation by state officer held an "act of bank- ruptcy," within priority statute (31 USCA § 191).-Id.
80(7) (U.S.D.C.Idaho) Bankruptcy of bank, entitling government to priority in deposits held shown, where bank was administered by state officer, directors and stockholders acquiescing (31 USCA § 191).-U. S. ex rel, Ray v. Porter, 24 F. (2d) 709.
~80(10) (U.S.D.C.Idaho) United States, having priority in state bank's funds, is entitled to injunction preventing state officer, liquidating bank from making any payments until United States is paid (31 USCA § 191).-U. S. ex rel. Ray v. Porter, 24 F. (2d) 139.
III. FUNCTIONS AND DEALINGS. (A) Banking Franchises and Powers, and Their Exercise in General.
99 (U.S.C.C.A.S.D.) Guaranty of indebted- ness due and of certificates of deposit which debtor bank might transfer to creditor bank held to cover debtor bank's certificate of deposit which depositor delivered to creditor bank. Akre v. Liberty State Bank of Minneapolis, 24 F. (2d) 816.
Guaranty of notes sold or rediscounted by
debtor bank held not to cover certificate of de- posit issued by it, which depositor delivered to creditor bank.-Id.
(F) Exchange, Money, Securities, and In- vestments.
1882 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Declaration alleging delivery of money, and defendant's failure to de- posit it in Hungarian bank or deliver passbook, held good on general demurrer.-Boer v. Revesz, 24 F. (2d) 103.
1881/2 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Contract whereby telegraph company, transmitting money, limit- ed liability as initial carrier, held valid.-Basila v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 24 F. (2d)
Telegraph company, limiting liability as initial carrier, held not liable for loss after delivering money to another medium.-Id.
1882 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Direction to bank to remit money to Germany "to-day" held to re- quire remittance within reasonable time only. Aachen & Munich Fire Ins. Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, 24 F. (2d) 463.
1881/2 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Contract to remit money to Germany by witness held breached, where remittance was not made within ten days. -Aachen & Munich Fire Ins. Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, 24 F. (2d) 465.
IV. NATIONAL BANKS.
286 (U.S.C.C.A.Idaho) Withdrawal of city funds by bank cashier as city treasurer imme-
diately preceding bank's suspension of business held void (12 USCA § 91).-American Surety Co. of New York v. Jackson, 24 F. (2d) 768.
2882 (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Evidence held in- sufficient to take to jury prosecution for mis- application of funds of member bank of Fed- eral Reserve Bank (12 USCA § 592).-Long v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 946.
Misapplication of funds with intent to de- fraud must be shown, in prosecution for mis- application of funds of member bank of Fed- eral Reserve Bank (12 USCA § 592).-Id.
2881/2 (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) In prosecution for making false entries in books of national bank, it must be alleged and proved that bank was member of Federal Reserve System (12 USCA § 592). Clark v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 696.
2 (U.S.C.C.A.Fla.) Statute punishing ac- ceptance of bribe by government officers held not superseded by later enactment as to internal USCA § 2071; 26 USCA § 64).-Smiler v. U. S., revenue officers or agents (Cr. Code, § 117 [18 24 F. (2d) 22.
6(1) (U.S.C.C.A.N.C.) Indictment for of- fering bribe to federal prohibition agent held sufficient (Cr. Code, § 39 [18 USCA § 91]).— Henderson v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 811.
13 (U.S.C.C.A.Fla.) Evidence of acceptance of bribe by internal revenue agent to influence action in favor of taxpayer held for jury.-Smiler v. U. S., 24 F. (2d) 22.
CANCELLATION OF INSTRUMENTS.
II. PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF.
34(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Fla.) Suit to cancel deed for fraud, brought more than 20 years after ex- ecution, held barred by laches (Rev. Gen. St. Fla. 1920, §§ 2932, 2939 [5]).-Scott v. Empire Land Co., 24 F. (2d) 417, affirming decree (D. C.) 5 F. (2d) 873.
37(8) (U.S.C.C.A.Fla.) Bill held not to state cause of action for cancellation of con- tract for sale of real estate to complainant.- Martin v. O'Neill, 24 F.(2d) 700.
47 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Evidence held to show that statements in application that insured was in good health were knowingly false, justifying rescission of policies.-Bankers' Life Co. v. Dixon, 24 F. (2d) 241.
I. CONTROL AND REGULATION OF COM- MON CARRIERS. (A) In General.
2 (U.S.D.C.Idaho) Statute regulating use of highways by transportation companies held not unconstitutional (Laws Idaho 1927, c. 237;
For cases in Dec. Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
Const. U. S. Amend. 14, § 1).-Sanger v. Lu- kens, 24 F. (2d) 226.
Individual transporting commodities for public held "common carrier," though he insisted on private contracts with shippers, and state regu- Îation did not violate federal Constitution (Const. U. S. Amend. 14, § 1).-Id.
State constitutional provisions relating to rail- roads held inapplicable to carrier by motor vehi- cles (Const. Idaho, art. 11, §§ 5, 6).-Id.
3 (U.S.D.C.Idaho) Individual hauling com- modities for public generally under special con- tracts held "transportation company," within Idaho statute (Laws Idaho 1927, c. 237).— Sanger v. Lukens, 24 F. (2d) 226.
"Private carrier" is one undertaking to de- liver goods in particular case for hire.-Id.
4 (U.S.D.C.Idaho) Individual transporting commodities for public held "common carrier,' though he insisted on private contracts with shippers (Const. U. S. Amend. 14, § 1).-Sanger v. Lukens, 24 F.(2d) 226.
"Common carrier" is one regularly offering to transport persons or commodities for any one choosing to employ him and pay charges.-Id.
8 (U.S.D.C.Idaho) State statute, regulating auto transportation business and imposing fee, held not to impose "tolls," in violation of fed- eral aid statute (Laws Idaho 1927, c. 237).- Sanger v. Lukens, 24 F. (2d) 226.
(B) Interstate and International Trans-
30 (U.S.D.C.Me.) Where published tariffs establish through rates on interstate shipments between two points, they are the only legal rates. -Ingalls v. Maine Cent. R. Co., 24 F. (2d) 113.
35 (U.S.D.C.Me.) Carrier and shipper can- not contract for interstate rates, but only for transportation at legal rates.-Ingalls v. Maine Cent. R. Co., 24 F. (2d) 113.
Published rates cannot be avoided by bills of lading over intrastate line and rebilling.-Id.
II. CARRIAGE OF GOODS. (I) Connecting Carriers. 177(3) (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Law holding initial carrier for loss of property held inapplicable to foreign commerce (Carmack Amendment [49 USCA § 20, pars. 11, 12]).-Basila v. West- ern Union Telegraph Co., 24 F. (2d) 569.
Liability of initial carrier, in absence of stat- ute or contract, is only for default occurring on own lines.-Id.
(J) Charges and Liens.
189 (U.S.D.C.La.) Combination of lowest intermediate rates must be applied, in absence of published through rate.-Davis v. Kelly-Web- er & Co., 24 F. (2d) 708.
Application of local rate for less than car- loads to interstate carload shipments held not justified.-Id.
IV. CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS. (D) Personal Injuries.
295(1) (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Railroad engineer must exercise highest degree of care practical in operating train.-Gray v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 24 F. (2d) 671.
301 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Engineer held as mat- ter of law not negligent in running train through switch opened by tramp, causing injury to pas- senger. Gray v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 24 F. (2d) 671.
320 (19) (App.D.C.) Negligence of street railroad in operation of car, resulting in in- jury to passenger when car lurched, held for jury.-Capital Traction Co. v. Lyon, 24 F. (2d)
(E) Contributory Negligence of Person Injured.
348(5) (App.D.C.) Instructions in passen- ger's action against street railroad, in effect
stating that leaving seat while car was mov- ing constituted contributory negligence, held properly denied.-Capital Traction Co. v. Lyon, 24 F.(2d) 262.
CHATTEL MORTGAGES.
V. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF CRED- ITORS.
186 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Statute making chat- tel mortgage without change of possession prima facie fraudulent merely declared com- mon law (2 Rev. St. N. Y. pt. 2, c. 7, tit. 2, § 5). In re Myers, 24 F. (2d) 349, modifying or- der (D. C.) 19 F. (2d) 600.
192 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Rights of chattel mortgagee, filing mortgage too late, are gov- erned by existing statute, whether or not re- peal of earlier statute revived common-law rule (Lien Law N. Y. § 230; 2 Rev. St. N. Y. pt. 2, c. 7, tit. 2, § 5; Personal Property Law N. Y. [Laws 1897, c. 417, § 40, and Consol. Laws, Revision 1909, c. 41, § 80]).-In re Myers, 24 F. (2d) 349, modifying order (D. C.) 19 F. (2d) 600.
Chattel mortgage, filed too late because of neglect, is valid as to subsequent creditors (Lien Law N. Y. § 230).—Id.
lateral indorsement of note extends only to amount paid in taking up note, with interest, as to which it has priority over creditors sub- sequent to filing, and prorates with prior cred- itors (Lien Law N. Y. § 230).—Id.
Lien of chattel mortgage given to secure col-
3 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Child born of Chinese parents on American merchant vessel on high seas is not citizen; "in the United States" (Const. Amend. 14, § 1).-Lam Mow v. Nagle, 24 F.(2d) 316, affirming judgment (D. C.) In re Lam Mow, 19 F. (2d) 951.
9 (U.S.D.C.Ga.) Resumption of citizenship by mother, divorced from alien, held to effect naturalization of minor child (Act March 2, 1907, § 5 [Comp. St. § 3962]).-In re Lazarus, 24 F. (2d) 243.
10 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Members of dissolved state corporation are presumably American citi- zens, entitled to recover damages for interfer- ence of United States vessels with sealing (28 USCA § 52).-U. S. v. Laflin, 24 F. (2d) 683.
I. RULES AND PRECAUTIONS FOR PRE- VENTING COLLISIONS IN GENERAL.
25 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Owners of vessel, which failed to use required care to avoid colliding with submarine, held entitled to limitation of liability and half damages, where submarine lacked prop- er sailing lights (Act Aug. 19, 1890 [amended May 28, 1894, and June 10, 1896] art. 2 [a], [c]. [d]; 33 USCA § 72; 33 USCA §§ 101, 104, 106, 108, 109; 46 USCA §§ 183-187; Public Vessels Act [46 USCA §§ 781-790]).-The City of Rome, 24 F. (2d) 729.
III. STEAM VESSELS MEETING OR CROSSING.
37 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Vessel, when in doubt of proximity and navigation of another vessel, must slow or stop and reverse (33 USCA §§ 101, 104, 106, 108, 109).-The City of Rome, 24 F. (2d) 729.
Ship held at fault in collision for failure to blow whistle, alter course, or change speed aft- er sighting white light on her starboard becom- ing brighter (33 USCA §§ 101, 104, 106, 108, 109).-Id.
VIII. LIGHTS, SIGNALS, AND LOOKOUTS.
~75(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Rules relative to lights on vessels held applicable to submarines (Act Aug. 19, 1890 [amended May 28, 1894,
and June 10, 1896] art. 2 [a], [c], [d]; 33 USCA § 72).-The City of Rome, 24 F. (2d) 729.
X. NARROW CHANNELS, HARBORS, RIV. ERS, AND CANAIS.
95(4) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Small launch held at fault for collision with barge being maneu- vered out of slip by tug, where it did nothing to get out of way.-The Socony No. 19, 24 F. (2d) 653.
XI. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND ER- RORS IN EXTREMIS.
106 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Case of vessel ma- neuvering to leave slip is one of "special circum- stances." The Socony No. 19, 24 F. (2d) 653.
XII. SUITS FOR DAMAGES. (A) Right of Action and Defenses. 115 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Colliding vessel is responsible in full to cargo owners of carrying vessel, where both vessels are at fault (Harter Act [46 USCA §§ 190-195]).-In re U. S. Steel Products Co., 24 F. (2d) 657, reversing order (D. C.) 16 F. (2d) 306.
(B) Parties, Preliminary Proceedings, and Pleading.
116 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Cargo owners of pri- vately owned vessel colliding with government vessel, which sank, held entitled to intervene in claim by United States for recovery of value of government vessel.-In re U. S. Steel Products Co., 24 F. (2d) 657, reversing order (D. C.) 16 F. (2d) 306.
130 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Interest on damages sustained in collision are ordinarily computed from date of collision, or date expenditures for repairs become payable.-The North America, 24 F. (2d) 846.
Interest on collision damages held limited to period of one year from entry of interlocutory decree two years after collision, plus accrued in- terest from time of collision.-Id.
Allowance of interest on damages from col- lision is not absolute right, but rests in court's discretion.-Id.
Interest on recovery for collision may be re- duced for delay in bringing cause to final deter- mination, though delay was caused by commis-
136 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Four days' allowance for survey and preparing specifications for re- pairs to schooner damaged in collisions held rea- sonable and fair.-The North America, 24 F. (2d) 846.
Detention for taking schooner damaged in two collisions to nearest repair yard to complete re- pairs necessitated by one collision held properly charged against respondent not responsible for such collision.-Id.
148 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Before sum awarded as value of vessel sinking after collision is paid to owners, just claims against it must be paid. -In re U. S. Steel Products Co., 24 F. (2d) 657, reversing order (D. C.) 16 F. (2d) 306.
Recovery by United States of value of vessel sunk in collision is subject to maritime liens of cargo owners.-Id.
I. POWER TO REGULATE IN GENERAL.
8(7) (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Power of state to leg- islate with reference to interstate commerce of telegraph companies was suspended by federal legislation thereon (Act June 18, 1910 [36 Stat. 539], amending Interstate Commerce Act).-Basila v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 24 F.(2d) 569.
State statutes relating to attorney's fees have no application in action against telegraph company for failure to deliver money in inter- state and foreign commerce (Act June 18, 1910 [36 Stat. 539], amending, Interstate Commerce Act).-Id.
10 (U.S.D.C.Idaho) In absence of national legislation, state may regulate use of highways, and impose license fees on motor vehicles mov- ing in intrastate or interstate commerce.-Sang- er v. Lukens, 24 F. (2d) 226.
II. SUBJECTS OF REGULATION.
28 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Transfer of money by telegraph from Florida to New York consti- tutes "interstate commerce."-Basila v. West- ern Union Telegraph Co., 24 F. (2d) 569.
33 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Transmission of money by express company from New York to Syria is "foreign commerce."-Basila V. Western Union Telegraph Co., 24 F. (2d) 569.
III. MEANS AND METHODS OF REGULA- TION.
60(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Interstate contract of sale cannot be rendered invalid by state stat- ute (Rev. St. Tex. 1925, arts. 7426, 7437).— Hughes Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Cicero Trust & Sav- ings Bank, 24 F. (2d) 199.
69 (U.S.D.C.Wash.) That state tax impos- ed on foreign corporation, doing both interstate and intrastate business, is based on authorized capital stock, does not render it invalid, as bur- den on intrastate commerce, or tax on property beyond state's jurisdiction.-Cudahy Packing Co. v. Hinkle, 24 F. (2d) 124.
State statute imposing excise taxes on foreign corporations held not unconstitutional, as ap- plied to corporation doing chiefly interstate busi- ness (Rem. Comp. Stat. Wash. §§ 3836, 3837 [amended by Laws Wash. Extra Sess. 1925, pp. 417, 418, §§ 1, 2]; § 3841 [amended by p. 418, § 31; $$ 3843, 3844 [amended by Laws Wash. 1923, p. 465, §§ 5, 61; § 3846; § 3853 [amended by Laws Wash. Extra Sess. 1925, p. 410, § 1];
77 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Tax on income of ex- port corporation held not tax or duty on arti- cles exported from state (Revenue Act 1918, §§ 230[a], 301 [Comp. St. §§ 6336% nn, 6336- 16aa]; Const. art. 1, § 9, par. 5).-Neuss Hesslein & Co. v. Edwards, 24 F. (2d) 989.
IV. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COM-
92 (U.S.D.C.Me.) Question of construction of published tariffs, as applied to certain ship- ments, is within jurisdiction of courts.-Ingalls v. Maine Cent. R. Co., 24 F. (2d) 113.
CONSPIRACY.
I. CIVIL LIABILITY. (B) Actions.
(E) Trial or Hearing, Judgment, and Re-18 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Complaint charging de-
150 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Ordinarily findings of commissioner in admiralty on conflicting testi- mony are accepted.-The North America, 24 F. (2d) 846.
Finding that master of damaged schooner was justified in refusing tow, and that delay while awaiting towage was due to factors common to two collisions, held not disturbed.-Id.
fendants jointly and severally with infringement and unfair competition held to require answer.- Premier Malt Products Co. v. G. A. Ackerman Printing Co., 24 F. (2d) 89.
II. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY. (A) Offenses.
23 (U.S.C.C.A.Fla.) Knowledge of conspir- acy by others and sympathy with and approval
« ПредыдущаяПродолжить » |