« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »
APPEARANCE of the hon. Samu-
Arguments of Mr. Harper previous to
the opening of the evidence in
favor of the respondent
Evidence on the part of the Respondent.
Washington, in defence of Judge The order of the court for judgment
MANAGERS FOR THE PROSECUTION.
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT.
John Randolph, Esq.
Joseph Hopkinson, Esq.
DIRECTIONS TO THE BINDER.
Be careful in collating to place a cancel leaf at page 49 ; also at page 172, and
THURSDAY, Yantiary) 5th 1804.
Friday, January 6th, 1804.
The house resumed the confideration of On a motion made and seconded, that
the motion of the fifth instant, "for the the house do come to the following reso. appointment of a committee to enquire lution :
into the official conduct of Samuel Chase,
one of the associate justices of the supreme Resolved, That a committee be appoint: court of the United States,"--and the ed to enquire into the official conduct of said motion, as originally proposed, be. Samuel Chase, one of the associate jufó ing again reâd, in the words following, tices of the supreme court of the United States, and to report their opinion, whe- ir Refolved, That a committee he apther the said Samuel Chase hath so acted poin:ed to enquire into the official conduct in his judicial capacity, as to require the of Samuel Chase, one of the associate interposition of the conftitutional power juftices of the fupreme court of the Uni. of this house:
ted States, and to report their opinion
whether the said Samuel Chase hath so The house proceeded to consider the acted in his judicial capacity, as to require faid motion at the clerk's table: Where. the interposition of the constitutional upon,
power of this house." A motion was made and seconded, thai
A motion was made and seconded, to the farther confideration of the said refo- amend the fame, by inserting after the
words lution be postponed until to-morrow.
one of the affociate justices of
the supreme court of the United States," And debate arising thereon,
the following words, " and of Richard PeAnother motion was made, and the ters, district judge of the district of Penn. question being put, that the house do fylvania." now adjourn,
And on the question, that the house do
agree to the said amendment, It passed in the negative - Yeas 52- It was resolved in the affirmativeNays 62.
Yeas 79-Nays 37.
Willis Alston, junior, Şeth Hafings,
John Rea (of Pennsylvania)
John Rhea of Tennessee)
William Kennedy, Thompson J. Skinner,
Nehemiah Knigh', James Sloan,
Jofeph Lewis, jun. John Smith (of Virginia)
John B. C. Lucas, Joseph Stanton,
Nicholas R. Moore, David Thomas,
Philip R. Thompson,
Philip Van Cortlandı,
Thomas Newton, jun. Isaac Van Horne,
Jofeph H. Nicholson, Joseph B. Varnum,
Daniel C. Verplanck,
John Randolph, jun. Joseph Winston, and
Thomas Wynns. -794
Those who voted in the negative are,
John Cotton Smith,
John Smith, (of N. York)
William M'Creery, Samuel Tenny,
Killian K. Van Rensselaer,
Samuel D. Purviance, John Whitehill, and
Lemuel Williams.- 374