with this, the very first thing we hear of him. after his arrival is, that he paid his mother a friendly visit. Thus rushing into the den of a lioness who was going to destroy her own whelp. Is it to be credited, my Lords, that a prince would act thus who believed that a conspiracy was formed against him by his own mother? Is it to be credited that any man would trust a mother who, contrary to all the rules of nature and policy, had conspired to destroy her own

son ?

Upon this matter your Lordships have the evidence of Captain Edwards, who was aide-decamp to the Nabob, who was about his person, his attendant at Chunar, and his attendant back again. I am not producing this to exculpate the Begums; for I say you cannot try them here, you have not the parties before you, they ought to have been tried on the spot;-but I am going to demonstrate the iniquity of this abominable plot beyond all doubt, for it is necessary your Lordships should know the length, breadth and depth of this mystery of iniquity.

Captain Edwards being asked "Whether he ever heard any native of credit and authority in the Nabob's dominions, who appeared to believe the rebellion of the Begums?-A. No, I never did. Q. Have you any reason to believe that the Nabob gave credit to it?-A. I really cannot

rightly

1

rightly presume to say whether the Nabob did or did not; but I am apt to believe that he did not. Q. Have you any reason and what to form a belief about it?-A. I have. I think if he supposed the rebellion ever existed at Fyzabad, he would have been the first person to take and give the alarm to the British troops. Q. And no such alarm was taken or given to the British troops?-A. No, I think not; as I was always about his person, and in the camp, I think I certainly must have known it or heard of it; but I never did."

We assure your Lordships you will find upon your printed Minutes, that Captain Edwards says he was credibly informed, that the Nabob left behind him a part of his guard of horse; and that so desirous was he to go into the power of this cruel lioness, his mother, that he advanced, as he is a vigorous man, and a bold and spirited rider, leaving all his guards behind him, and rode before them into the middle of Fyzabad. There is some more evidence to the same purpose in answer to the question put next to that which I read before.

Q. "When you did hear of the rebellion, did not you understand it to have been alleged, that one object of it was to dethrone the Nabob himself as well as to extirpate the English ?A. I understood that the intention of the prin

cesses,

cesses, the Begums, was to extirpate the English troops out of the country, and out of those dominions, and likewise to depose her son, and set another son, who seems to have been a greater favourite of that family, upon the throne, in the room of the present Nabob, and that son's name is Saadit Ali. I have only heard this from report. I have no other knowledge but mere report. I understood from the report, she was to extirpate the English and depose her son, who is now upon the throne. Q. Was it after or before the seizing of the treasures, that you heard a circumstantial account of the supposed object of the rebellion?-A. The report was more general after the seizing of the treasures; but yet there were reports prevailing in the neighbourhood, that our troops were sent there in consequence of the charge that was made by Colonel Hannay and some of his officers, of a rebellion existing then at Fyzabad, or having existed, I cannot rightly say which. Q. Was that report after the order for the troops to march to Fyzabad? - A. It was more general, it was very general then when the troops did march there, and more general after the seizing of the treasures. Q. When did the troops first march ?-A. it was some time in the month of January, I believe in the year 1782. Q. While you was with the Nabob, in passing from Lucknow to Chunar,

and

and while you was with him, or the army returning from Chunar, did you then, out of the whole army regular or irregular, ever hear of any report of the Begums being in rebellion ?-A. No, I do not recollect I ever did. Q. Upon cross examination-do you recollect at what time in August 1781 you left Lucknow to proceed with the Nabob to Chunar?-A. No I cannot rightly mention the date; all that I know is this, that I accompanied the Nabob, Mr. Middleton, and his attendants, all the way from Lucknow to Chunargur, I really cannot recollect, I have no notes, and it is so distant a time since, that I do not recollect the particulars of the month or the day; but I recollect perfectly I accompanied the Nabob all the way from Lucknow to Chunar, and returned again with him until he struck off on the road for Fyzabad."

Your Lordships see plainly the whole of this matter; when they had resolved to seize the Begums' treasures, they propagated this report just in proportion to their acts. As they proceeded, the report grew hotter and hotter. This man tells you when it was that the propagation of this report first began; when it grew hot, and when it was in its greatest heat. He tells you, that not one native of credit in the country believed it; that he did not think the Nabob himself

himself believed it; and he gives a reason that speaks for itself, namely, that he, the Nabob, would have been the first man to give the alarm if he believed in a rebellion, as he was to be the object of it.

He says the the English were the principal spreaders of the report. It was, in fact, a wicked report, propagated by Mr. Middleton and the English agents, for the purpose of justifying their iniquitous.spoliation of the Begums.

This is the manner in which the matter stands upon the ground of rebellion, with the exception of Major Gilpin's and Hyder Beg Khan's testimony. This last man we have proved to have been kept in his office by Mr. Hastings's influence, and to have been entirely under his government. When this dependant comes to give his attestation, he gives a long account of all the proceedings of Cheit Sing's rebellion, with which the rebellion charged on the Begums was supposed to be coincident; and he ends it very remarkably that he tells the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. But it is also remarkable, that even this Hyder Beg Khan never mentions by name the rebellion of the Begums, nor says that he ever heard a word about it : a strong proof that he did not dare in the face of his country, to give countenance to such a falsehood.

VOL. XVI.

E

Major