Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

glory acquired at a cheaper rate, says one of his eulogists. Satisfied with the least of the little, he only felt the necessity of completing his Floras; and the want of fortune did not deprive him of his glory, nor of that statue raised to hun after death in the gardens of the University of Upsal; nor of that solemn eulogy delivered by a crowned head; nor of those medals which the king of Sweden, and the Swedes, struck, to commemorate the genius of the three kingdoms of Nature.

In substituting fortune for the object of his designs, the man of genius deprives himself of the inspirations of him who lives for himself; that is, for his Art. If he bends to the public taste, not daring to raise it to his own, he has not the choice of his subjects, which itself is a sort of invention. A task-worker ceases to think his own thoughts; the stipulated price and time are weighing on his pen or his pencil, while the hour-glass is dropping its hasty sands. If the man of genius would become something more than himself if he would be wealthy and even luxurious, another fever torments him, besides the thirst of glory; such ardent desires create many fears, and a mind in fear is a mind in slavery. So inadequate, too, are the remunerations of literary works, that the one of the greatest skill and difficulty, and the longest labour, is not valued with that hasty spurious novelty for which the taste of the publie is craving, from the strength of its disease, rather than its appetite. Rousseau observed that his musical opera, the work of five or six weeks, brought him as much money as he had received for his Emilius, which had cost him twenty years of meditation, and three years of composition. This single fact represents a hundred. In one of Shakespeare's sonnets he pathetically laments this compulsion of his necessities which forced him on the trade of pleasing the public; and he illustrates this degradation by a novel image. 'Chide Fortune,' cries the bard,The guilty goddess of my harmless deeds, That did not better for my life provide

Than public means which public manners breeds;
Thence comes it that my name receives a brand;
And almost thence my nature is subdued

To what it works in, LIKE THE DYER'S HAND.' Such is the fate of that author, who, in his variety of task-works, blue, yellow, and red, lives without ever having shown his own natural complexion. We hear the eloquent truth from another who has shared in the bliss of composition, and the misery of its daily bread.' 'A single nour of composition won from the business of the day, is worth more than the whole day's toil of him who works at the trade of literature; in the one case the spirit comes joyfully to refresh itself, like a hart to the waterbrooks; in the other it pursues its miserable way, panting and jaded with the dogs of hunger and necessity behind.'*

Genius undegraded and unexhausted, may, indeed, even in a garret, glow in its career; but it must be on the principle which induced Rousseau solemnly to renounce writing' par metier.' This in the Journal des Scavans he once attempted, but found himself quite inadequate to the profession.'t In a garret, the author of the Studies of Nature' exultingly tells us that he arranged his work. 'It was in a little garret, in the new street of St Etienne du Mont, where I resided four years, in the midst of physical and domestic afflictions. But there I enjoyed the most exquisite pleasures of my life, amid profound solitude and an enchanting horizon. There I put the finishing hand to my Studies of Nature,' and there I published them.

It has been a question with some, more indeed abroad than at home, whether the art of instructing mankind by the press would not be less suspicious in its character, were it less interested in one of its motives? We have had some noble self-denials of this kind, and are not without them even in our country. Boileau almost censures Racine for having accepted money for one of his dramas, while he who was not rich, gave away his elaborate works to the public; and he seems desirous of raising the art of writing to a more disinterested profession than any other requiring no fees. Milton did not compose his immortal labour with any view of copyright; and Linnæus sold his works for a single ducat. The Abbé Mably, the author of many political and moral works, preserved the dignity of the literary character, for while he lived on little, he would accept only a few presentation copies from the booksellers. Since we have become a nation of book collect• Quarterly Review, No. XVI, p. 538.

Twice he repeated this resolution.-See his works, Vol. xxxi, p. 283. Vol. xxxii, p. 90.

ary

ors, the principle seems changed; even the wealthy author becomes proud of the largest tribute paid to his genius, because this tribute is the evidence of the numbers who pay it; so that the property of a book represents to the literary candidate so many thousand voters in his favour. The man of genius wrestling with heavy and oppressive fortune, who follows the avocations of an author as a precarious source of existence, should take as the model of the authorial life that of Dr Johnson; the dignity of the litercharacter was ever associated with his feelings; and the reverence thyself' was present to his mind even when doomed to be one of the Helote of literature, by Osborn, by Cave, or by Millar. Destitute of this ennobling principle, the author sinks into the tribe of those rabid adventurers of the pen who have masked the degraded form of the literary character under the title of authors by profession-the Guthries, the Ralphs, and the Amhursts. * There are worse evils, for the literary man,' says a modern author, who is himself the true model of the literary character. than neglect, poverty, imprisonment, and death. There are even more pitable objects than Chatterton himself with the poison of his lips.' I should die with hunger, were I at peace with the world,' exclaimed a corsair of literature, and dashed his pen into that black flood before him of soot and gall.

CHAPTER XIII.

THE MATRIMONIAL STATE.

Matrimony has often been considered as a condition not well suited to the domestic life of genius; it is accompanied by too many embarrassments for the head and the heart It was an axiom with Fuessli, the Swiss artist, that the marriage state is incompatible with a high cultivation of the fiue arts. Peiresc the great French collector, refused marriage, convinced that the cares of a family were too absorbing for the freedom necessary to literary pursuits, and a sacrifice of fortune incompatible with his great designs. Boyle, who would not suffer his studies to be interrupted by household affairs,' lived as a boarder with his sister, Lady Ranelagh. Bayle, and Hobbes, and Hume, and Gibbon, and Adam Smith, decided for celibacy. Such has been the state of the great author whose sole occupation is combined with passion, and whose happiness is his fame-fame, which balances that of the heroes of the age, who have sometimes honoured themselves by acknowledging it.

This debate, for our present topic has sometimes warmed into one, in truth is ill adapted for controversy; the heart is more concerned in its issue than any espoused doctrine terminating in partial views. Look into the domestic annals of genius-observe the variety of positions into which the literary character is thrown in the nuptial state. Will cynicism always obtain his sullen triumph, and prudence be allowed to calculate away some of the richer feelings of our nature? Is it an axiom that literary characters must necessarily institute a new order of celibacy? One position we may assume, that the studies, and even the happiness of the pursuits of literary characters, are powerfully influenced by the domestic associate of their lives.

Men of genius rarely pass through the age of love without its passion: even their Delias and Amandas are often the shadows of some real object. According to Shakspeare's experience,

'Never durst poet touch a pen to write, Until his ink were tempered with love's sighs.' Love's Labour Lost, Act IV. Scene 3. Their imagination is perpetually colouring those pictures of domestic happiness they delight to dwell on. He who is no husband may sigh for that devoted tenderness which is at once bestowed and received; and tears may start in the eyes of him who can become a child among children, and is no father. These deprivations have usually been the concealed cause of the querulous and settled melancholy of the literary character. The real occasion of Shenstone's unhappiness was, that early in life he had been captivated by a young lady adapted to be both the muse and the wife of the poet. Her mild graces were soon touched by his plaintive love-songs and elegies. Their

The reader will find an original letter by Guthrie to a Minister of State, in which this modern phrase was probably his own invention, with the principle unblushingly avowed. See Calamities of Authors,' vol. I, p. 5. Ralph farther opens mysteries, in an anonymous pamphlet of The Case of Authors by profession.' They were both pensioned.

sensibility was too mutual, and lasted for some years, till, she died. It was in parting from her that he first sketched his Pastoral Ballad.' Shenstone had the fortitude to refuse marriage; his spirit could not endure that she should participate in that life of deprivations to which he was doomed, by an inconsiderate union with poetry and poverty. But he loved, and his heart was not locked up in the ice of celibacy. He says in a moment of humour, 'It is long since I have considered myself as undone. The world will not perhaps consider me in that light entirely till I have married my maid.' Thomson met a reciprocal passion in his Amanda, while the full tenderness of his heart was ever wasting itself like waters in a desert. As we have been made little acquainted with this part of the history of the poet of the Seasons, I give his own description of these deep feelings from a manuscript letter written to Mallet. To turn my eyes a softer way, to you know who-absence sighs it to me. What is my heart made of? a soft system of low nerves, too sensible for my quiet-capable of being very happy or very unhappy, I am afraid the last will prevail. Lay your hand upon a kindred heart, and despise me not. I know not what it is, but she dwells upon my thought in a mingled sentiment, which is the sweetest, the most intimately pleasing the soul can receive, and which I would wish never to want towards some dear object or another. To have always some secret darling idea to which one can still have recourse amidst the noise and nonsense of the world, and which never fails to touch us in the most exquisite manner, is an art of happiness that fortune cannot deprive us of. This may be called romantic; but whatever the cause is, the effect is really felt. Pray, when you write, tell me when you saw her, and with the pure eye of a friend, when you see her again, whisper that I am her most humble servant.' Even Pope was enamoured of a scornful lady; and as Johnson observed, 'polluted his will with female resentment.' Johnson himself, we are told by Miss Seward, who knew him, 'had always a metaphysical passion for one princess or other, the rustic Lucy Porter, or the haughty Molly Aston, or the sublimated methodistic Hill Boothby; and lastly, the more charming Mrs Thrale. Even in his advanced age, at the height of his celebrity, we hear his cries of lonely wretchedness. I want every comfort; my life is very solitary and very cheerless. Let me know that I have yet a friend-let us be kind to one another.' But the 'kindness' of distant friends is like the polar sun, too far removed to warm. A female is the only friend the solitary can nave, because her friendship is never absent. Even tnose who have eluded individual tenderness, are tortured by an aching void in their feelings. The stoic Akenside, in his books of 'Odes,' has preserved the history of a life of genius in a series of his own feelings. One entitled, At Study,' closes with these memorable lines;

[ocr errors]

Me though no peculiar fair
Touches with a lover's care;
Though the pride of my desire
Asks immortal friendship's name,
Asks the palm of honest fame

And the old heroic lyre;

Though the day have smoothly gone,
Or to lettered leisure known,

Or in social duty spent ;
Yet at eve my lonely breast
Seeks in vain for perfect rest,
Languishes for true content.'

If ever a man of letters lived in a state of energy and excitement which might raise him above the atmosphere of social love, it was assuredly the enthusiast, Thomas Hollis, who, solely devoted to literature and to republicanism, was occupied in furnishing Europe and America with editions of his favourite authors. He would not marry, lest marriage should interrupt the labours of his platonic politics. But his extraordinary memoirs, while they show an intrepid mind in a robust frame, bear witness to the self-tormentor who had trodden down the natural bonds of domestic life. Hence the deep dejection of his spirits;' those incessant cries, that he has no one to advise,' assist, or cherish those magnanimous pursuits in him.' At length he retreated into the country, in utter hopelessness. I go not into the country for attentions to agriculture as such, nor attentions of interest of any kind, which I have ever despised as such; but as a used man, to pass the remainder of a life in tolerable sanity and quiet, after having given up the flower of it, voluntarily, day, week, month, year after year successive to each other, to public

service, and being no longer able to sustain, in body or
mind, the labours that I have chosen to go through with-
out falling speedily into the greatest disorders, and it might
be imbecility itself. This is not colouring, but the exact
plain truth,' and Gray's,

'Poor moralist, and what art thou?
A solitary fly!

Thy joys no glittering female meets,
No hive hast thou of hoarded sweets.'

Assuredly it would not be a question whether these literary characters should have married, had not Montaigne, when a widower, declared that he would not marry a second time, though it were wisdom itself;'-but the airy Gascon has not disclosed how far Madame was concerned in this anathema.

If the literary man unites himself to a woman whose taste and whose temper, are adverse to his pursuits, he must courageously prepare for a martyrdom. Should a female mathematician be united to a poet, it is probable that she would be left to her abstractions; to demonstrate to herself how many a specious diagram fails when brought into its mechanical operation; or while discovering the infinite varieties of a curve, may deduce her husband's. If she becomes as jealous of his books as other wives are of the mistresses of their husbands, she may act the virago even over his innocent papers. The wife of Bishop Cooper, while her husband was employed on his Lexicon, one day consigned the volume of many years to the flames; and obliged that scholar to begin a second siege of Troy in a second Lexicon. The wife of Whitelocke often destroyed his Mss and the marks of her nails have come down to posterity in the numerous lacerations still gaping in his 'Memorials.' The learned Sir Henry Saville, who devot ed more than half his life, and near ten thousand pounds, to his magnificent edition of St Chrysostom, led a very uneasy life between that Saint and Lady Saville; what with her tenderness for him and her own want of amusement, Saint Chrysostom incurred more than one danger. One of those learned scholars who translated the Scriptures, kept a diary of his studies and his domestic calamities, for they both went on together; busied only among his books, his wife, from many causes, plunged him 100 debt; he was compelled to make the last sacrifice of a Inerary man, by disposing of his library. But now, he wubout books, and she worse and worse in temper, discontents were of fast growth between them. Our man of study, found his wife, like the remora, a little fish, sticking at the bottom of his ship impeding its progress. He desperately resolved to fly from the country and his wife. There is à cool entry in the diary, on a warm proceeding, one morning; wherein he expresses some curiosity to know the cause of his wife being out of temper! Simplicity of a patient scholar* The present matrimonial case, however, terminated in unexpected happiness; the wife, after having forced her husband to be deprived of his library, to be daily chronicling her caprices, and finally, to take the serious resolution of abandoning his country, yet, living in good old times, religion and conscience united them again; and, as the connubial diarist ingeniously describes this second marriage of himself and his wife, made it be with them, as surgeons say it is with a fractured bone, if once well set, the stronger for a fracture.' A new consolation for do mestic ruptures!

Observe the errors and infirmities of the greatest men of genius in their matrimonial connections. Milton carried wives; his first wife was the object of sudden fancy. He nothing of the greatness of his mind, in the choice of his left the metropolis, and unexpectedly returned a married man; united to a woman of such uncongenial dispositions, that the romp was frightened at the literary habits of the great poet, found his house solitary, beat his nephews, and ran away after a single month's residence! to this circumstance, we owe his famous treatise on Divorce, and a party, (by no means extinct.) who, having made as ill choices in their wives, were for divorcing, as fast as they had been for marrying, calling themselves Miltonast. When we find that Moliere, so skilful in human life, mare ried a girl from his own troop, who made him experience

*The entry may amuse. Hodie, nescio qua intemper's uxorem meam agitavit, nam pecuniam latam projecí humi, ac sic irata discessit. This day, I know not the cause of the ill-temper of my wife; when I gave her money for daily passion. For some, this Flemish picture must be too farmexpences, she flung it upon the ground and departed m fiar to please, too minute a copy of vulgar life.

all those bitter disgusts and ridiculous embarrassments which he himself played off at the Theatre; that Addison's fine taste in morals and in life, could suffer the ambition of a courtier to prevail with himself to seek a Countess, whom he describes under the stormy character of Oceana, who drove him contemptuously into solitude, and shortened his days; and, that Steele, warm and thoughtless, was united to a cold precise Miss Prue,' as he calls her, and from whom he never parted without bickerings; in all these cases we censure the great men, not their wives.* Rousseau has honestly confessed his error: he had united himself to a low illiterate woman-and when he retreated into

solitude, he felt the weight which he carried with him. He laments that he had not educated his wife; In a docile age, I could have adorned her mind with talents and know ledge which would have more closely united us in retirement. We should not then have felt the intolerable tædium of a tete à tete; it is in solitude one feels the advantage of living with another who can think.' Thus Rousseau confesses the fatal error, and indicates the right principle.

But it seems not absolutely necessary for the domestic happiness of the literary character, that his wife should be a literary woman. The lady of Wieland was a very pleasing domestic person, who without reading her husband's works, knew he was a great poet. Wieland was apt to exercise his imagination in a sort of angry declamation and bitter amplifications; and the writer of this account in perfect German taste, assures us, that many of his felicities of diction were thus struck out at a heat :' during this frequent operation of his genius, the placable temper of Mrs Wieland overcame the orgasm of the German bard, merely by her admiration and her patience. When the burst was over, Wieland himself was so charmed by her docility, that he usually closed with giving up all his opinions. There is another sort of homely happiness, aptly described in the plain words of Bishop Newton: He found the study of sacred and classic authors ill agreed with butchers' and bakers' bills; and when the prospect of a bishopric opened on him, more servants, more entertainments, a better table, &c.' it became necessary to look out for some clever sensible woman to be his wife, who would lay out his money to the best advantage, and be careful and tender of his health; a friend and companion at all hours, and who would be happier in staying at home than be perpetually gadding abroad.' Such are the wives, not adapted to be the votaries, but who may be the faithful companions through life, even of a man of genius.

[ocr errors]

6

That susceptibility, which is love in its most compliant forms, is a constitutional faculty in the female character, and hence its docility and enthusiasm has varied with the genius of different ages. When universities were opened to the sex, have they not acquired academic glory? Have not the wives of military men shared in the perils of the field, and as Anna Comnena, and our Mrs Hutchinson, become even their historians? In the age of love and sympathy the female receives an indelible character from her literary associate; his pursuits are even the objects of her thoughts; he sees his tastes reflected in his family, much less by himself, whose solitary labours often preclude him from forming them, than by that image of his own genius in his house-the mother of his children. Antiquity abounds with many inspiring examples of this cameleon reflection of the female character. Aspasia, from the arms of Pericles, borrowing his genius, could instruct the archons how to govern the republic; Portia, the wife of the republican Brutus, devouring the burning coals, showed a glorious suicide which Brutus had approved; while Paulina, the wife of Seneca, when the veins of that philosopher were commanded to be opened, voluntarily chose the same death; the philosopher commanded that her flowing blood should be stopped, but her pallid features ever after showed her still the wife of Seneca! The wife of Lucan is said to have transcribed and corrected the Pharsalia after the death of her husband; the tender mind of the wife had caught the energy of the bard by its intercourse; and when he was no more, she placed his bust on her bed, that she might never close her eyes without being soothed by his image. The picture of a literary wife of antiquity has descended to us, touched by the domestic pencil of a man of genius. It is the susceptible Calpburnia, the lady of the younger Pliny; her affection to me has given her a turn to books-her passion will in

crease with our days, for it is not my youth or my person, which time gradually impairs, but my reputation and my glory, of which she is enamoured.' Could Mrs Hutchinson have written the life of her husband, had she not reflected from the patriot himself, all his devotedness to the country, had she not lent her whole soul to every event which concerned him? This female susceptibility was strong in the wife of Klopstock; our novelist Richardson, who could not read the Messiah in the original, was de sirous of some account of the poem, and its progress. She writes to him that no one can inform him better than herself, for she knows the most of that which is not published, being always present at the birth of the young verses, which begin by fragments here and there, of a subject of which his soul is just then filled. Persons who live as we do have no need of two chambers; we are always in the same; I with my little work, still, still,-only regarding sometimes my husband's sweet face, which is so venerable at that time, with tears of devotion and all the sublimity of the subject-my husband reading me his young verses and suffering my criticisms.' Meta Mollers writes with enthusiasm, and in German English; but he is a pitiful critic who has only discovered the oddness of her language. Gesner declared that whatever were his talents, the person who had most contributed to develope them was his wife. She is unknown to the public; but the history of the mind of such a woman can only be truly discovered in the Letters of Gesner and his Family.' While Gesner gave himself up entirely to his favourite arts, drawing, painting, etching, and composing poems, his wife would often reanimate a genius that was apt to despond in its attempts, and often exciting him to new productions, her certain and delicate taste was attentively consulted by the poet-painter-but she combined the most practical good sense with the most feeling imagination; this forms the rareness of the character-for this same woman, who united with her husband in the education of their children, to relieve him from the interruptions of common business, carried on alone the concerns of his house in la librairie. Her correspondence with her son, a young artist travelling for his studies, opens what an old poet comprehensively terms a gathered mind.' Imagine a woman attending the domestic economy, and the commercial details yet withdrawing out of this business of life into that of the more elevated pursuits of her husband, and the cares and counsels she bestowed on her son to form the artist and the man.

her.

To know this incomparable woman we must hear 'Consider your father's precepts as oracles of wisdom; they are the result of the experience he has collected, not only of life, but of that art which he has acquir ed simply by his own industry.' She would not have her son suffer his strong affection to herself to absorb all other sentiments. Had you remained at home, and been habituated under your mother's auspices to employments merely domestic, what advantage would you have acquired ? I own we should have passed. some delightful winter evenings together; but your love for the arts, and my ambition to see my sons as much distinguished for their talents as their virtues, would have been a constant source of regret at your passing your time in a manner so little worthy of you.' How profound is her observation on the strong but confined attachments of a youth of genius. I have frequently remarked, with some regret, the excessive attachment you indulge towards those who see and feel as you do yourself, and the total neglect with which you seem to treat every one else. I should reproach a man with such a fault who was destined to pass his life in a small and unvarying circle; but in an artist, who has a great object in view, and whose country is the whole world, this disposi tion seems to me likely to produce a great number of incenveniences-alas! my son, the life you have hitherto led in your father's house has been in fact a pastoral life, and not such a one as was necessary for the education of a man whose destiny summons him to the world.'-And when her sou, after meditating on some of the most glorious productions of art, felt himself as he says, 'disheartened and cast down at the unattainable superiority of the artist, and that it was only by reflecting on the immense labour and continued efforts which such master pieces must have required, that I regained my courage and my ardour,' sho observes, this passage, my dear son, is to me as precious as gold, and I send it to you again, because I wish you to impress it strongly on your mind. The remembrance of this may also be a useful preservative from too great con• See Curiosities of Literature, for various anecdotes of 'Li-fidence in your abilities, to which a warm imagination may terary Wives.

sometimes be liable, or from the despondence you might

occasionally feel from the contemplation of grand originals Continue, therefore, my dear son, to form a sound judgment and a pure taste from your own observations; your mind, while yet young and flexible, may receive whatever impressions you wish. Be careful that your abilities do not inspire in you too much confidence, lest it should happen to you as it has to many others, that they have never possessed any greater merit than that of having good abilities.' One more extract to preserve an incident which may touch the heart of genius. This extraordinary woman whose characteristic is that of strong sense with delicacy of feeling, would check her German sentimentality at the moment she was betraying those emotions in which the imagination is so powerfully mixed up with the associated feelings. Arriving at their cottage at Sihlwald, she proceeds-On entering the parlour three small pictures, painted by you, met my eyes. I passed some time in contemplating them. It is now a year, thought I since I saw him trace these pleasing forms; he whistled and sang, and I saw them grow under his pencil; now he is far, far from us. In short, I had the weakness to press my lips on one of these pictures. You well know, my dear son, that I am not much addicted to scenes of a sentimental turn; but to-day, while I considered your works, I could not restrain from this little impulse of maternal feelings. Do not, however, be apprehensive that the tender affection of a mother will ever lead me too far, or that I shall suffer my mind to be too powerfully impressed with the painful sensations to which your absence gives birth. My reason convinces me that it is for your welfare that you are now in a place where your abilities will have opportunities of unfolding, and where you can become great in your Such was the incomparable wife and mother of the Gesners! Will it now be a question whether matrimony is incompatible with the cultivation of the arts? A wife who reanimates the drooping genius of her husband, and a mother who is inspired by the ambition of seeing her sons eminent, is she not the real being which the ancients only personfied in their Muse?

art.'

CHAPTER XIV.
LITERARY FRIENDSHIPS.

Among the virtues which literature inspires, is that of the most romantic friendship. The deliriumof love, and even its lighter caprices, are incompatible with the pursuits of the student; but to feel friendship like a passion, is necessary to the mind of genius, alternately elated and depressed, ever prodigal of feeling, and excursive in knowledge.

The qualities which constitute literary friendship, compared with those of men of the world, must render it as rare as true love itself, which it resembles in that intellectual tenderness of which both so deeply participate. Two atoms must meet out of the mass of nature, of such purity, that when they once adhere, they shall be as one, resisting the utmost force of separation. This literary friendship begins in the dews of their youth,' and may be said not to expire on their tomb. Engaged in similar studies, if one is found to excel, he shall find in the other the tector of his fame. In their familiar conversations, the promemory of the one associates with the fancy of the other; and to such an intercourse, the world owes some of the finer effusions of genius, and some of those monuments of labour which required more than one giant hand.

In the poem Cowley composed on the death of his friend Harvey, this stanza opens a pleasing scene of two young literary friends engaged in their midnight studies.

'Say, for you saw us, ye immortal lights

How oft unwearied have we spent the nights,
Till the Ladæan stars, so famed for love,
Wondered at us from above.

We spent them not in toys, in lust, or wine;
But search of deep philosophy,

Wit, eloquence, and poetry;

Arts which I loved, for they, my friend, were thine.' Milton has not only given the exquisite Lycidas to the memory of one young friend, but his Epitaphium Damonis to another.

Now, mournfully cries the youthful genius, as versified by Langhorne,

To whom shall I my hopes and fears impart,
Or trust the cares and follies of my heart?

The Sonnet of Gray on West, is another beautiful instance of that literary friendship of which we have several instances in our own days, from the school or the college; and which have rivalled in devoted affections any which these pages can record.

Such a friendship can never be the lot of men of the world, for it takes its source in the most elevated feelings; it springs up only in the freshness of nature, and is gathered in the golden age of human life. It is intellectual, and it gaities and factious assemblies. The friendships of the loves solitude; for literary friendship has no convivial men of society move on the principle of personal interest, or to relieve themselves from the listlessness of existence; but interest can easily separate the interested, and as weariness is contagious, the contact of the propagator is watched. Men of the world may look on each other with the same countenances, but not with the same hearts. Literary friendship is a sympathy, not of manners, but of feelings. In the common mart of life may be found intimacies which terminate in complaint and contempt; the more they know one another, the less is their mutual es teem; the feeble mind quarrels with one still more imbecile than himself; the dissolute riot with the dissolute, and despicable. while they despise their companions, they too have become

That perfect unity of feeling, that making of two mdividuals but one being is displayed in such memorable friendships as those of Beaumont and Fletcher; whose labours were so combined that no critic can detect the closely united, that no biographer can compose the me mingled production of either; and whose lives were so moirs of the one without running into the life of the other. Their days were as closely interwoven as their verses. Montaigne and Charron, in the eyes of posterity, are ri vals, but such literary friendship knows no rivalry; such was Montaigne's affection for Charron, that he requested him by his will to bear the arms of the Montaignes; and Charron evinced his gratitude to the manes of his departed friend, by leaving his fortune to the sister of Montaigne. How pathetically Erasmus mourns over the death of his beloved Sir Thomas More-In Moro mihi videor extinc us,' I seem to see myself extinct in More.'-It was a melancholy presage of his own death, which shortly after followed. The Doric sweetness and simplicity of old Isaac Walton, the angler, were reflected in a mind as clear and generous, when Charles Cotton continued the feelings, rather than the little work of Walton. Metas

tasio and Farinelli called each other il Gemello, the Twin and both delighted to trace the resemblance of their lives and fates, and the perpetual alliance of the verse and the voice. Goguet, the author of The Origin of the Arts and Sciences,' bequeathed his MSS. and his books to his friend Fugere, with whom he had long united his affec tions and his studies, that his surviving friend might pro ceed with them; but the author had dred of a slow and painful disorder, while Fugere had watched by the side of his dying friend, in silent despair; the sight of those MSS. and books was his death-stroke; half his soul which had once given them animation was parted from him, and a few weeks terminated his own days. When Loyd heard of the death of Churchill, he neither wished to survive him nor did. The Abbé de St Pierre gave an interesting proof of literary friendship for Varignon the geome trician; they were of congenial dispositions, and St Pierre, when he went to Paris, could not endure to part with Va rignon, who was too poor to accompany him; and St Pierre was not rich. A certain income, however moderate, was necessary for the tranquil pursuits of geometry. St Pierre presented Varignon with a portion of his small income, accompanied by that delicacy of feeling which men of genius who know each other can best conceive: 'I do not give it you,' said St Pierre, as a salary, but an annuity, that thus you may be independent and quit me when you dislike me.' The same circumstance occurred between Akenside and Dyson, who, when the poet was in great danger of adding one more illustrious name to the Calamities of Authors, interposed between him and illfortune, by allowing him an annuity of three hundred a year, and when he found the fame of his literary friend attacked, although not in the habit of composition, Dyson published an able and a curious defence of Akenside's poetical and philosophical character. The name and character of Dyson have been suffered to die away, with out a single tribute of even biographical sympathy; but in the record of literary glory, the patron's name should be inscribed by the side of the literary character; for the

public incurs an obligation whenever a man of genius is bigotry of an ascetic? Rochefoucauld, says the eloquent protected. Dugald Stewart, in private life was a conspicuous examThe statesman Fouquet, deserted by all others, wit-ple of all those moral qualities of which he seemed to deny nessed La Fontaine hastening every literary man to the prison-gate; many have inscribed their works to their disgraced patron, in the hour

When Int'rest calls off all her sneaking train, And all the obliged desert, and all the vain, They wait, or to the scaffold, or the cell, When the last ling'ring friend has bid farewell. Such are the friendships of the great literary character! Their elevated minds have raised them into domestic heroes, whose deeds have been often only recorded on that fading register, the human heart.

CHAPTER XV.

THE LITERARY AND PERSONAL CHARACTER.

Are the personal dispositions of an author discoverable in his writings as those of an artist are imagined to appear in his works, where Michael Angelo is always great and Raphael ever graceful?

Is the moralist a moral man? Is he malignant who publishes caustic satires? Is he a libertine who composes loose poems ? And is he whose imagination delights in terror and in blood, the very monster he paints?

Many licentious writers have led chaste lives. La Mothe le Vayer wrote two works of a free nature; yet his was the unblemished life of a retired sage. Bayle is the too faithful compiler of impurities, but he resisted the corruption of the senses as much as Newton. La Fontaine wrote tales fertile in intrigues, yet the bon homme' has not left on record a single ingenious amour. Smollet's character is immaculate; yet he has described two scenes which offend even in the freedom of imagination. Cowley, who boasts with such gaiety of the versatility of his passion among so many mistresses, wanted even the confidence to address one. Thus, licentious writers may be very chaste men; for the imagination may be a volcano, while the heart is an Alp of ice.

Turn to the moralist-there we find Seneca, the disinterested usurer of seven millions, writing on moderate desires, on a table of gold. Sallust, who so eloquently declaims against the licentiousness of the age, was repeatedly accused in the Senate of public and habitual debaucheries; and when this inveigher against the spoilers of provinces attained to a remote government, Sallust pillaged like Verres. Lucian, when young, declaimed against the friendship of the great, as another name for servitude; but when his talents procured him a situation under the Emperor, he facetiously compared himself to those quacks, who themselves plagued with a perpetual cough, offer to sell an infallible remedy for one. Sir Thomas More, in his Utopia, declares that no man ought to be punished for his religion; yet he became a fierce persecutor, racking and burning men when his own true faith here was at the ebb. At the moment the poet Rousseau was giving versions of the Psalms, full of unction, as our neighbours say, he was profaning the same pen with the most infamous of epigrams. We have heard of an erotic poet of our times composing sacred poetry, or night-hymns in church-yards. The pathetic genius of Sterne played about his head, but never reached his heart.

And thus with the personal dispositions of an author, which may be quite the reverse from those which appear in his writings. Johnson would not believe that Horace was a happy man, because his verses were cheerful, no more than he could think Pope so, because he is continually informing us of it. Young, who is constantly contemning preferment in his writings, was all his life pining after it and while the sombrous author of the Night Thoughts' was composing them, he was as cheerful as any other man; he was as lively in conversation as he was gloomy in his writings: and when a lady expressed her surprise at his social converse, he replied There is much difference between writing and talking.' Molière, on the contrary, whose humour was so perfectly comic, and even ludicrous, was a very thoughtful and serious man, and perhaps even of a melancholy temper: his strongly. featured physiognomy exhibits the face of a great tragic, rather than of a great comic, poet. Could one have imagined that the brilliant wit, the luxuriant raillery, and the fine and deep sense of Paschal could have combined with the most opposite qualities-the hypochondriasm and

the existence, and exhibited in this respect a striking contrast to the Cardinal De Retz, who has presumed to cen sure him for his want of faith in the reality of virtue; and to which we must add, that De Retz was one of those pretended patriots without a single of those virtues for which he was the clamorous advocate of faction. When Valincour attributed the excessive tenderness in the tragedies of Racine to the poet's own impassioned character, the younger Racine amply showed that his father was by no means this slave of love; that his intercourse with a certain actress was occasioned by his pains to form her, who with a fine voice, and memory, and beauty, was incapable of comprehending the verses she recited, or accompanying them with any natural gesture. The tender Racine never wrote a single love poem, nor had a mistress; and his wife had never read his tragedies, for poetry was not her delight. Racine's motive for making love the constant source of action in his tragedies, was on the principle which has influenced so many poets, who usually conform to the prevalent taste of the times. In the court of a young monarch, it was necessary that heroes should be lovers; and since Corneille had so nobly run in one career, Racine could not have existed as a great poet, had he not rivalled him in an opposite one. The tender Racine was no lover; but he was a subtle and epigrammatic observer, before whom his convivial friends never cared to open their minds. It is not therefore surprising if we are often erroneous in the conception we form of the personal character of a distant author. Klopstock, the votary of Zion's muse, so astonished and warmed the sage Bodiner, that he invited the inspired bard to his house; but his visiter shocked the grave professor, when, instead of a poet rapt in silent meditation, a volatile youth leapt out of the chaise, who was an enthusiast for retirement only when writing verses. An artist whose pictures exhibit a series of scenes of domestic tenderness, awakening all the charities of private life, participated in them in no other way than on his canvass. Evelyn, who has written in favour of active life, loved and lived in retirement; while Sir George Mackenzie framed an eulogium on solitude, who had been continually in the bustle of business.

Thus an author and an artist may yield no certain indication of their personal character in their works. Inconstant men will write o constancy, and licentious minds may elevate themselves into poetry and piety. And were this not so, we should be unjust to some of the greatest geniuses, when the extraordinary sentiments they put into the mouths of their dramatic personages are maliciously applied to themselves. Euripides was accused of athe ism, when he made a denier of the gods appear on the stage. Milton has been censured by Clarke for the impiety of Sa tan; and it was possible that an enemy of Shakspeare might have reproached him for his perfect delineation of the accomplished villain Iago; as it was said that Dr Moore was sometimes hurt in the opinions of some, by his horrid Zeluco, Crebillon complains of this.They charge me with all the iniquities of Atreus, and they consider me in some places as a wretch with whom it is unfit to associate; as if all which the mind invents must be derived from the heart.' This poet offers a striking instance of the little alliance existing between the literary and personal dispositions of an author, Crebillon, who exulted on his entrance into the French academy, that he had never tinged his pen with the gall of satire, delighted to strike on the most harrowing string of the tragic lyre. In his Atreus, the father drinks the blood of his son; in Rhadamistus, the son expires under the hand of the father; in Electra, the son assassinates the mother. A poet is a painter of the soul; but a great artist is not therefore a bad man.

Montaigne appears to have been sensible of this fact in the literary character. Of authors, he says, he likes to read their little anecdotes and private passions; and adds, 'Car j'ai une singulière curiosité de connoitre l'ame et les naifs jugemens de mes auteurs. Il faut bien juger leur suffisance, mais non pas leurs moeurs, ni eux, par cette montre de leurs écrits qu'ils étalent au théatre du monde.' Which may be thus translated-For I have a singular curiosity to know the soul and simple opinions of my authors. We must judge of their ability, but not of their manners, nor of themselves, by that show of their writings which they display on the theatre of the world.' This is very just, and are we yet convinced, that the simplicity of

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »