For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

(E) Actions for Price or Value.
340 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Unpaid seller is en-
titled to recover purchase price on buyer's
breach, where title has passed (Personal Prop-
erty Law N. Y. § 144 [as amended by Laws
1925, c. 560]).—Higgins v. California Prune &
Apricot Growers, 16 F. (2d) 190.

(F) Actions for Damages.

381 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Burden is on seller
to show reasonable efforts to resell on buyer's
rejection, where title has not passed.-Higgins
v. California Prune & Apricot Growers, 16 F.
(2d) 190.

382 (U.S. C. C. A. N. Y.) Buyer's action
against purchaser from it for breach of con-
tract held irrelevant in original seller's action
for buyer's breach of contract.-Mitsubishi
Goshi Kaisha v. J. Aron & Co., 16 F. (2d) 185.

IX. CONDITIONAL SALES.

Sentence

Statute gives no lien on ship to injured_sea-
man (Jones Act, § 33 [Comp. St. § 8337a]).
-Id.

29(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.)
powder on deck at time cargo was being dis-
Permitting loose
charged held negligent.-Petition of Clyde S.
S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 930.

29(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Seaman
through negligence of mate held not entitled to
injured
recover in libel against vessel under general
maritime law.-The Pinar Del Rio, 16 F. (2d)
984.

Seaman injured through negligence of mate
held not entitled to recover under Jones Act in
libel against ship (Jones Act, § 33 [Comp. St.
§ 8337a]).-Id.

29(3) (U.S.D,C.Me.) Stevedore employed
in discharging ship is "seaman," and fellow
servant rule does not apply in suit for his injury
(Act June 5, 1920, § 33, amending Act March 4,
1915, § 20 [Comp. St. § 8337a]).-The Lillian,
16 F.(2d) 146.
in-

460 (U.S.C.C.A.Tenn.) Where seller
serted number of machine in purchaser's order
and note previously executed, retention of title
contract was invalid under Tennessee statute
(Shannon's Code, § 3670a1).-Elliotte v. Na-
tional Cash Register Co., 16 F. (2d) 464.

SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
II. PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
(H) Pupils, and Conduct and Discipline
of Schools.

167 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) State text-book com-
mission held authorized to adopt dictionary as
a text-book, to be used to exclusion of all others
(Ky. St. §§ 4382, 4421a7, 4421a17).-Funk &
Wagnalls Co. v. American Book Co., 16 F. (2d)
137.

SEAMEN.

3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Statute of District of
Columbia held applicable to action against
Emergency Fleet Corporation for death of sea-
man in Africa (Act March 3, 1901, §§ 1301-
1303 [31 Stat. 1394, 1395]).-U. S. Shipping
Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Green-
wald, 16 F. (2d) 948.

In action against Emergency Fleet Corpora-
tion and operator of ship for death of seaman,
District of Columbia death statute held properly
applied against operator as owner pro hac vice
(Act March 3, 1901, §§ 1301-1303 [31 Stat.
1394, 1395]).—Id.

10 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Neglect to furnish suit-
able food is chargeable to owner's agent, as well
as owner, and makes both ship and owner lia-
ble.-U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet
Corporation v. Greenwald, 16 F. (2d) 948.

19 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Refusal of master to
pay wages demanded held not "without suffi-
cient cause" which entitled seamen to penalty
(Seamen's Act March 4, 1915, § 3 [Comp. St. §
8320]). O'Hara v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 16 F.
(2d) 681.

29(1) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Injured seaman on
British ship held not entitled, under law of
Great Britain, to recover in libel against ship.
-The Pinar Del Rio, 16 F. (2d) 984.

29(4) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Seaman did not as-
sume risk of defective winch, with operation of
which he was not concerned.-In re Lucken-
bach S. S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 168.

29(4) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Ship employee held
not guilty of contributory negligence in explo-
sion of powder leaking from cases of which he
had no knowledge.-Petition of Clyde S. S. Co.,
16 F.(2d) 930.

29(5) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Evidence held in-
sufficient to show negligence of construction
company in not equipping quarter boat with
searchlight and railings.-Martin v. Lower Coast
Const. Co., 16 F. (2d) S35.

29(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Evidence held to
show that injury to seaman was due to defective
16 F. (2d) 168.
condition of winch.-In re Luckenbach S. S. Co.,

Evidence held to show that seaman injured by
fall of draft was not negligent.-Id.

29 (5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Seaman's death held
to have resulted from explosion of powder when
employee dropped lighted match thereon.-Pe-
tition of Clyde S. S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 930.

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.

3 (U.S.C.C.A.Mich.) Cabin, containing still
in wooded swamp 230 feet from accused's
dwelling, held not part of home curtilage, pro-
tected against search and seizure.-Dulek v. U.
S., 16 F. (2d) 275.

3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Entry under search
warrant held lawful.-U. S. v. Kirschenblatt, 16
F. (2d) 202; U. S. v. Kirsch, 16 F. (2d) 204.
Papers may be seized, if offending (Search
Warrant Act, § 2, subd. 3 [Comp. St. §
10496b]).-Id.

ly seized should be returned to parties from
5 (App.D.C.) Generally property unlawful-
whom taken.-Dickhart v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 345.

7 (U.S.C.C.A.Idaho) Search on open prem-
ises without warrant held not unreasonable

(Const. Amend. 4).-Koth v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 59.
Special protection to people in "persons,
houses, papers, and effects" does not extend
to open fields (Const. Amend. 4).-Id.

7 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Search of automobile on
highway, based on information that certain au-
tomobile was going to haul whisky over high-
way, held unconstitutional (Const. Amend. 4).
-U. S. v. Allen, 16 F. (2d) 320.

7 (App.D.C.) Arrest of defendant without
warrant while transporting liquor held warrant-
ed, and search incidental thereto not unreason-
able (National Prohibition Act, tit. 2, § 26
[Comp. St. § 101382mm]).-Cohn v. U. S.,
16 F.(2d) 652.

SENTENCE.

See Criminal Law, 984-999.

See Drains.

SEWERS.

SHIPPING.

See Salvage; Wharves.

1. REGULATION IN GENERAL.

3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Congress may regulate
domestic merchant ships on high seas or in for-
eign waters.-Milliken v. Stone, 16 F. (2d) 981.

4 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Law authorizing for-
feiture of vessel engaging in unlicensed trade
held not repealed by Prohibition Act (Comp.
St. § 8132; National Prohibition Act, tit. 2, §
26 [Comp. St. § 101382mm]).-The Mineola,
16 F.(2d) 844.

sel, in libel for wharfage charges paid.-The
Ioannis Vatis, 16 F. (2d) 284.

54 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) City and contractor
held liable for damage to chartered scows car-
rying refuse, resulting from fire on dumps with-
out available water apparatus.-Shamrock
Towing Co. v. City of New York, 16 F. (2d) 199.

58(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) In suit to recover
charter hire and for damage to vessel, evidence
held to support findings for owner.-Scripps v.
Moran, 16 F. (2d) 259.

58(2) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Under pleadings,
charterer held not liable for owner's loss of
charter party on failure to return vessel with-
in stipulated time.-Orvig's Dampskibselskab
Aktieselskab v. Munson 'S. S. Line, 16 F.(2d)

957.
6 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Pleasure yacht held
to breach license in landing cargo of whisky
for pay (Comp. St. § 7804).-The Conejo, 16 F.
(2d) 264.

16 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Pleasure yacht held
subject to seizure and forfeiture for landing
cargo of whisky for pay (Comp. St. § 7804).-
The Conejo, 16 F.(2d) 264.

Whether original seizure of yacht was legal,
or illegal was immaterial, after subsequent
adoption thereof.-Id.

Decree or forfeiture of pleasure yacht held
not subject to complaint because of order for
delivery at certain place (Comp. St. § 7804).-
Id.

16 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Owner leasing vessel
cannot plead lack of knowledge as ground for
resisting forfeiture for engaging in unlicensed
trade (Comp. St. § 8132).-The Mineola, 16
F. (2d) 844.

Evidence held to sustain finding that vessel
was used by lessee in violation of license au-
thorizing forfeiture (Comp. St. § 8132).—Id.

Whether vessel carries intoxicating liquors
or other merchandise, when used in unlicensed
trade, is immaterial (Comp. St. § 8132).—Id.

16 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Tug licensed for coasting
trade, found loaded with liquor, held engaged in
trade other than for which licensed, and with
cargo subject to forfeiture (Comp. St. § 8132).
-The Lorraine Rita, 16 F. (2d) 607.

Defect in allegation of fact basis for forfeiture
of tug held such as could be cured by amendment
(Comp. St. § 8132, admiralty rule 21).-Id.

II. TITLE.

V. LIABILITIES OF VESSELS AND OWN-
ERS IN GENERAL.

em-

84(1) (U. S. D. C. Wash.) Machinist,
ployed by contractor repairing vessel, had cause
of action against owner for injuries resulting
from negligence of owner's employees.-Wal-
lace v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 309.

Vessel owner held liable for injuries to con-
tractor's employee from negligence of its em-
ployees, in absence of specific stipulation in in-
demnity agreement.-Id.

Owner's personal liability for injuries to con-
tractor's employee resulting from negligence of
its employees is not coextensive with liability
in rem.-Id.

84 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.) Shipowner's failure to
furnish safe appliances for use of stevedores
is negligence.-O'Connor, Harrison & Co. v.
Klingel, 16 F.(2d) 460.

Owner held liable for injury to stevedore's
employee by defective winch furnished by ves-
sel.-Id.

84(3) (U.S.D.C.Me.) Injury to longshore-
man employed by contracting terminal company
in falling from ladder, held due to negligence of
company.-The Lillian, 16 F. (2d) 146.

84(3) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Owner's employees
held to have negligently changed scaffolding
without notice to contractor's employee work-
ing in same hold.-Wallace v. U. S., 16 F.(2d)
309.

Vessel owner held liable for injuries to con-
tractor's employee resulting from defective
scaffolding used by own employees.-Id.
Negligence of owner's employees as to scaf-
fold held proximate cause of injury to machinist
repairing vessel.-Id.

27 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Shipping board's receipt
of renewal notes, indorsed by transferee of pur-
chaser, held not to constitute consent to trans-
fer of document.-The Smith & Terry No. 3, 1684(5) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Machinist, making
F. (2d) 613.

302 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Shipping Board's let-
ter, requesting transfer papers for approval,
held not surrender of document subjecting its
preferred mortgage to subsequent claim (Ship
Mortgage Act 1920, § 30, subsec. B (4), and
subsection 0 (a), being Comp. St. §§ 81464k,
8146400).-The Smith & Terry No. 3, 16 F.
(2d) 613.

III. CHARTERS.

repairs on vessel for contractor, had right to
assume proper care would be taken for his pro-
tection.-Wallace v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 309.

Machinist, repairing vessel while employed by
contractor, was charged only with known de-
fects.-Id.

Hazard created by vessel owner held not or-
dinary risk of employment, assumed by machin-
ist.-Id.

Machinist, making repairs on yessel for con-
tractor, had right to assume that owner's em-
ployees, doing painting, would use reasonably
safe appliances. Id.

86(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Alaska) Evidence of sim-
ilar accident shortly after injury to person on
wharf held competent to show vessel's appli-
ance for unloading was defective.-Alaska S. S.
Co. v. Katzeek, 16 F. (2d) 210.

Whether defendant's employé expected appli-
ance to break inadmissible when willfulness or
wantonness not charged.-Id.

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

Statutes

123 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Stowage of quebracho 32(3) (App.D.C.) Contract for exchange
extract between-decks between No. 1 and No. 2
hatches from Buenos Aires to Boston held not
of realty, executed by one joint owner with au-
negligent.-Monnier v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 812.
thority of the other, held not lacking in mutual-
ity of remedy.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F.(2d)
339.

130 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Carrier held not at fault
for proceeding with contract after barges' col-
lision at canal gate.-The Tourist, 16 F. (2d)
154.

73 (App.D.C.) No one can be compelled to
serve another against his will.-Robb v. Craw-
ford, 16 F. (2d) 339.

132(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Evidence held not to
show carrier by barges abandoned contract of
carriage on towing tug declining to proceed.-95 (App.D.C.) Where
The Tourist, 16 F. (2d) 154.

III. GOOD FAITH AND DILIGENCE.

141(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Fusing together of
bags of quebracho extract during shipment con-
stituted change of character," within excep-
tion of bill of lading.-Monnier v. U. S., 16 F.
(2d) 812.

Necessary effect of climate and heat on que-
bracho extract, when ship passed through equa-
torial region, was within exception of bill of
lading.-Id.

146 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Full freight under bill
of lading must be paid by shipper, who in course
of transportation requires return of goods.
The Tourist, 16 F. (24) 154.

148 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Deduction from freight
must be made for shipper's expense for tug
to complete trip, on tug hired by carrier quit-
ting. The Tourist, 16 F. (2d) 154.

Shipper cannot counterclaim against freight
money claim for fault in another independent
shipment.-Id.

No exception to rule against counterclaiming
for damages from other shipment arises from
carrier's bankruptcy.-Id.

150/2 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Pledge of freight
money for advances to complete trip and for
running other boats held valid.-The Tourist,
16 F.(2d) 154.

VIII. CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS.

165 (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) $4,900 damag-
es for steamship company's breach of contract
of passage held clearly excessive, and result of
passion and prejudice.-New York & Porto Rico
S. S. Co. v. Garcia, 16 F. (2d) 734.

XI. LIMITATION OF OWNER'S LIABILITY.

may

208 (U.S.C.C.A.Md.) Corporations
limit liability arising from conditions to which
they are not privy (Comp. St. §§ 8020, 8021).
-Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid
Works v. Chesapeake Lighterage & Towing Co.,
16 F.(2d) 765.

209 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.Md.) Evidence held to
warrant granting of corporation's petition for
limitation of liability for loss from sinking of
lighter.-Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid
Works v. Chesapeake Lighterage & Towing
Co., 16 F. (2d) 765.

SLANDER.

See Libel and Slander.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.

I. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF REMEDY IN
GENERAL.

8 (App.D.C.) Specific performance of con-
tract to exchange realty is within judicial dis-
cretion.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F. (2d) 339.
Court's discretion in matter of decreeing spe-,
cific performance is not arbitrary or capricious.
-Id.

II. CONTRACTS ENFORCEABLE.

30 (App.D.C.) Lessee held entitled to
specific performance of covenant to sell at
stated price "on terms to be agreed on."-Mor-
ris v. Ballard, 16 F. (2d) 175.

32(2) (App.D.C.) Lack of mutuality when
contract was executed does not bar specific per-
formance, if supplied on part of plaintiff before
suit.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F. (2d) 339.

defendant
tender of deed, failure of plaintiff to clear in-
waived
cumbrance before trial did not preclude specific
performance.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F. (2d)

339.

STATES.

1. POLITICAL STATUS AND RELATIONS.
4 (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) State statute, prevent-
ed from operating on all subjects within its pur-
view by congressional inhibition, becomes fully
effective on removal of inhibition.-Buder v.
First Nat. Bank, 16 F. (2d) 990.
4 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Conflict between
statute and act of Congress need not be literal
state
and express, to result in invalidity of former.
-Staten Island Rapid Transit Ry. Co. v. Pub-
lic Service Commission of State of New York.
16 F.(2d) 313.

9 (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Statute prohibiting in-
troduction of liquor into Indian country re-
mained in force after admission of Oklahoma
as state (Comp. St. §§ 4136b, 4137aa).-Sharp
v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 876.

VI. ACTIONS.

191 (1) (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) By creating a com-
mission with authority to sue and be sued,
state, as to such commission, waives its consti-
tutional immunity from suit (Const. Amend. U.
S. 11; Comp. St. Wyo. 1920, §§ 3025–3037).—
Utah Const. Co. v. State Highway Commission
of Wyoming, 16 F. (2d) 322.

191(2) (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) Action on contract
against state highway commission held one
against the state.-Utah Const. Co. v. State
Highway Commission of Wyoming, 16 F. (2d)
322.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

See Limitation of Actions.

STATUTES.

For statutes relating to particular subjects, see
the various specific topics.

1. ENACTMENT, REQUISITES, AND VA-
LIDITY IN GENERAL.

64(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) State act requiring
electrification of railroads, invalid in parts con-
flicting with federal statute, cannot be sustained
as to other parts (New York Public Service
Commission Law, § 53-a).-Staten Island Rap-
id Transit Ry. Co. v. Public Service Commis-
sion of State of New York, 16 F. (2d) 313.
III. SUBJECTS AND TITLES OF ACTS.
109 (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) Porto Rican
act is not violative of organic law, if objects
thereof are germane to main subject or ap-
included therein (Organic Act Porto Rico, § 34).
propriate to accomplishment of objects fairly
Arocho v. People of Porto Rico, 16 F. (2d) 90.

113(3) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) State statute, au-
thorizing railroad to lease its road, held not in-
valid, as embracing subjects not expressed in
title (St. Cal. 1880, p. 21; Const. Cal. art. 4,
§ 24).-Barnes v. Southern Pac. Co., 16 F.(2d)
100.

118(6) (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) Provision of
act temporarily abolishing death penalty, by
held not ineffective, as not expressed in title
which act was to stand repealed on certain date,
(Acts Porto Rico 1917, No. 36, § 6; Organic

Act Porto Rico, § 34; Penal Code Porto Rico,
§§ 202, 219).-Arocho v. People of Porto Rico,
16 F. (2d) 90.

V. REPEAL, SUSPENSION, EXPIRATION,
AND REVIVAL.

172 (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) Formal re-en-
actment and publication of statute relating to
death penalty, after temporary abolition or sus-
pension by legislative act, held unnecessary
(Penal Code Porto Rico, § 202; Acts Porto
Rico 1917, No. 36).-Arocho v. People of Porto
Rico, 16 F. (2d) 90.

VI. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION.
(A) General Rules of Construction.
176 (U.S.C.C.A.Or.) Construction of doubt-
ful state statute will not be indulged by federal
courts, where unnecessary for case.-Anderson
v. Eischen, 16 F. (2d) 54.

190 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Courts cannot read pro-
visions into unambiguous statutes.-Leeb v. U.
S., 16 F. (2d) 937.

219 (U.S.C.C.A.R.I.) Construction of stat-
ute adopted by department after it had been
in operation for 14 years held of little weight
to aid its interpretation by a court.-U. S. v.
Manzi, 16 F. (2d) 884.

219 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Interpretation of copy-
right law by Copyright Office is entitled to
consideration.-Stephens v. Howells Sales Co.,
16 F. (2a) 805.

226 (U.S.C.C.A.Wyo.) Rule that statute
will be construed as it is construed by courts of
state from which it is taken is subject to many
exceptions.-Kraus v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.,
16 F. (2d) 79.

(D) Retroactive Operation.

263 (U.S.C.C.A.Alaska) Statutes are pre-
sumed intended to operate prospectively.
Alaska Consol. Canneries v. Territory of Alas-
ka, 16 F.(2d) 256.

STATUTES CONSTRUED.

UNITED STATES.

CONSTITUTION.

100
374

1866, July 27, ch. 278, § 18, 14 Stat. 299.. 100
1870, July 8, ch. 230, 16 Stat. 198.....598, 805
1875, March 3, ch. 152, 18 Seat. 482.
1871, March 3, ch. 122, 16 Stat. 573..
1875, March 3, ch. 152, § 4, 18 Stat. 483... 374
1876, June 30, ch. 156, §§ 1-3, 19 Stat. 63 906
1876, Aug. 15, ch. 287, 19 Stat. 143..
1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379. See In-
terstate Commerce Act.

653

59, 62, 320, 802
.62, 776, 921, 970

.395, 459
.150, 290, 322
.297, 401, 639
504
981

1891, March 3, ch. 517, § 11, 26 Stat. 829.. 206
1891, March 3, ch. 565, § 1, 26 Stat. 1106.. 805
1892, May 5, ch. 60, § 6, 27 Stat. 25.
Amended 1893, Nov. 3, ch. 14, § 1, 28
Stat. 7

492

1892, July 23, ch. 234, 27 Stat. 260.
1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, § 3, 27 Stat. 445. 306
1893, March 2, ch. 196, 27 Stat. 531..313, 550
1893, March 2, ch. 196, § 2, 27 Stat. 531.. 550
1893, March 3, ch. 225, § 3, 27 Stat. 751.. 371
1893, Nov. 3, ch. 14, § 1, 28 Stat. 7.... 492
1894, Aug. 13, ch. 280, 28 Stat. 278.
Amended 1905, Feb. 24, ch. 778, 33 Stat.
811
233 1894, Aug. 27, ch. 349, § 48, 28 Stat. 563.. 197
233 1895, March 1, ch. 145, § 8, 28 Stat. 697.. 876
177 1897, Jan. 30 ch. 109, 29 Stat. 506.... . 876
285 1898, July 1, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544. See

876

456

769

693

Stat. 1394, 1395..

Bankruptcy Act.
1898, July 1, ch. 545, 30 Stat. 594..
233 1900, April 12, ch. 191, § 1, 31 Stat. 77. 545
268 1901, March 3, ch. 854, §§ 1301-1303, 31
769
948
.955, 1001

559

20

119

47 (a)

109

50(k)

119

§§ 63 (a), 64

233

§ 64(a)

301, 779

1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, 33 Stat. 724...349, 490
1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, § 5, 33 Stat. 725. 347
1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, § 5b, 33 Stat. 725 598
1905, Feb. 24, ch. 778, 33 Stat. 811.
1906, June 11, ch. 3073, 34 Stat. 232.
1906, June 16, ch. 3335, §§ 13, 16, 17, 34
Stat. 275, 276

§ 70a

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

1906, June 29, ch. 3592, § 4(6), 34 Stat. 598 884
1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35 Stat. 65....550, 924
1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35 Stat. 65.
Amended 1910, April 5, ch. 143, 36 Stat.
291
1909, Feb. 9, ch. 100, § 2, 35 Stat. 614.
Amended 1922, May 26, ch. 202, § 1f, 42
Stat. 596