For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
(E) Actions for Price or Value. 340 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Unpaid seller is en- titled to recover purchase price on buyer's breach, where title has passed (Personal Prop- erty Law N. Y. § 144 [as amended by Laws 1925, c. 560]).-Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Growers, 16 F. (2d) 190.
(F) Actions for Damages.
381 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Burden is on seller to show reasonable efforts to resell on buyer's rejection, where title has not passed.-Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Growers, 16 F. (2d) 190.
382 (U. S. C. C. A. N. Y.) Buyer's action against purchaser from it for breach of con- tract held irrelevant in original seller's action for buyer's breach of contract.-Mitsubishi Goshi Kaisha v. J. Aron & Co., 16 F. (2d) 185.
IX. CONDITIONAL SALES.
Statute gives no lien on ship to injured_sea- man (Jones Act, § 33 [Comp. St. § 8337a]). -Id.
29(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) powder on deck at time cargo was being dis- Permitting loose charged held negligent.-Petition of Clyde S. S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 930.
29(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Seaman injured through negligence of mate held not entitled to recover in libel against vessel under general maritime law.-The Pinar Del Rio, 16 F. (2d) 984.
held not entitled to recover under Jones Act in Seaman injured through negligence of mate libel against ship (Jones Act, § 33 [Comp. St. § 8337a]).-Id.
29(3) (U.S.D.C.Me.) Stevedore employed in discharging ship is "seaman," and fellow servant rule does not apply in suit for his injury (Act June 5, 1920, § 33, amending Act March 4, 1915, § 20 [Comp. St. § 8337a]).-The Lillian, 16 F. (2d) 146. in-
460 (U.S.C.C.A.Tenn.) Where seller serted number of machine in purchaser's order and note previously executed, retention of title contract was invalid under Tennessee statute
29(4) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Seaman did not as- sume risk of defective winch, with operation of which he was not concerned.-In re Lucken- bach S. S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 168.
(Shannon's Code, § 3670a1).-Elliotte v. Na-29(4) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Ship employee held tional Cash Register Co., 16 F. (2d) 464.
SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS. II. PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
(H) Pupils, and Conduct and Discipline of Schools.
167 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) State text-book com- mission held authorized to adopt dictionary as a text-book, to be used to exclusion of all others (Ky. St. §§ 4382, 4421a7, 4421a17).-Funk & Wagnalls Co. v. American Book Co., 16 F. (2d) 137.
3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Statute of District of Columbia held applicable to action against Emergency Fleet Corporation for death of sea- man in Africa (Act March 3, 1901, §§ 1301- 1303 [31 Stat. 1394, 1395]).-U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Green- wald, 16 F. (2d) 948.
In action against Emergency Fleet Corpora- tion and operator of ship for death of seaman, District of Columbia death statute held properly applied against operator as owner pro hac vice (Act March 3, 1901, §§ 1301-1303 [31 Stat. 1394, 1395]).—Id.
10 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Neglect to furnish suit- able food is chargeable to owner's agent, as well as owner, and makes both ship and owner lia- ble.-U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Greenwald, 16 F. (2d) 948.
19 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Refusal of master to pay wages demanded held not "without suffi- cient cause" which entitled seamen to penalty (Seamen's Act March 4, 1915, § 3 [Comp. St. § 8320]).-O'Hara v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 681.
29(1) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Injured seaman on British ship held not entitled, under law of Great Britain, to recover in libel against ship. -The Pinar Del Rio, 16 F. (2d) 984.
not guilty of contributory negligence in explo- sion of powder leaking from cases of which he had no knowledge.-Petition of Clyde S. S. Co., 16 F.(2d) 930.
29(5) (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Evidence held in- sufficient to show negligence of construction company in not equipping quarter boat with searchlight and railings.-Martin v. Lower Coast Const. Co., 16 F. (2d) S35.
29(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Evidence held to show that injury to seaman was due to defective condition of winch.-In re Luckenbach S. S. Co., 16 F.(2d) 168.
Evidence held to show that seaman injured by fall of draft was not negligent.-Id.
29(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Seaman's death held to have resulted from explosion of powder when employee dropped lighted match thereon.-Pe- tition of Clyde S. S. Co., 16 F. (2d) 930.
SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.
3 (U.S.C.C.A.Mich.) Cabin, containing still in wooded swamp 230 feet from accused's dwelling, held not part of home curtilage, pro- tected against search and seizure.-Dulek v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 275.
3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Entry under search warrant held lawful.-U. S. v. Kirschenblatt, 16 F. (2d) 202; U. S. v. Kirsch, 16 F. (2d) 204. Papers may be seized, if offending (Search Warrant Act, § 2, subd. 3 [Comp. St. § 10496b]).—Id.
5 (App.D.C.) Generally property unlawful- ly seized should be returned to parties from whom taken.-Dickhart v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 345.
7 (U.S.C.C.A.Idaho) Search on open prem- ises without warrant held not unreasonable (Const. Amend. 4).-Koth v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 59. Special protection to people in "persons, houses, papers, and effects" does not extend to open fields (Const. Amend. 4).-Id.
7 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Search of automobile on highway, based on information that certain au- tomobile was going to haul whisky over high- way, held unconstitutional (Const. Amend. 4). -U. S. v. Allen, 16 F. (2d) 320.
7 (App.D.C.) Arrest of defendant without warrant while transporting liquor held warrant- ed, and search incidental thereto not unreason- able (National Prohibition Act, tit. 2, § 26 [Comp. St. § 101381⁄2mm]).-Cohn v. U. S., 16 F.(2d) 652.
See Criminal Law, 984-999.
1. REGULATION IN GENERAL.
3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Congress may regulate domestic merchant ships on high seas or in for- eign waters.-Milliken v. Stone, 16 F. (2d) 981.
4 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Law authorizing for- feiture of vessel engaging in unlicensed trade held not repealed by Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 8132; National Prohibition Act, tit. 2, § 26 [Comp. St. § 101381⁄2mm]).-The Mineola, 16 F. (2d) 844.
sel, in libel for wharfage charges paid. The Ioannis Vatis, 16 F. (2d) 284.
54 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) City and contractor held liable for damage to chartered scows car- rying refuse, resulting from fire on dumps with- out available water apparatus.-Shamrock Towing Co. v. City of New York, 16 F. (2d) 199.
charter hire and for damage to vessel, evidence 58(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) In suit to recover held to support findings for owner.-Scripps v. Moran, 16 F. (2d) 259.
58(2) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Under pleadings, charterer held not liable for owner's loss of charter party on failure to return vessel with- in stipulated time.-Orvig's Dampskibselskab Aktieselskab v. Munson 'S. S. Line, 16 F.(2d)
957. 6 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Pleasure yacht held to breach license in landing cargo of whisky for pay (Comp. St. § 7804).-The Conejo, 16 F. (2d) 264.
16 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Pleasure yacht held subject to seizure and forfeiture for landing cargo of whisky for pay (Comp. St. § 7804).- The Conejo, 16 F. (2d) 264.
Whether original seizure of yacht was legal, or illegal was immaterial, after subsequent adoption thereof.-Id.
Decree or forfeiture of pleasure yacht held not subject to complaint because of order for delivery at certain place (Comp. St. § 7804).— Id.
16 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Owner leasing vessel cannot plead lack of knowledge as ground for resisting forfeiture for engaging in unlicensed trade (Comp. St. § 8132).-The Mineola, 16 F. (2d) 844.
Evidence held to sustain finding that vessel was used by lessee in violation of license au- thorizing forfeiture (Comp. St. § 8132).-Id.
Whether vessel carries intoxicating liquors or other merchandise, when used in unlicensed trade, is immaterial (Comp. St. § 8132).—Id.
16 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Tug licensed for coasting trade, found loaded with liquor, held engaged in trade other than for which licensed, and with cargo subject to forfeiture (Comp. St. § 8132). -The Lorraine Rita, 16 F. (2d) 607.
Defect in allegation of fact basis for forfeiture of tug held such as could be cured by amendment (Comp. St. § 8132, admiralty rule 21).-Id.
27 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Shipping board's receipt of renewal notes, indorsed by transferee of pur- chaser, held not to constitute consent to trans- fer of document.-The Smith & Terry No. 3, 16 F. (2d) 613.
302 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Shipping Board's let- ter. requesting transfer papers for approval, held not surrender of document subjecting its preferred mortgage to subsequent claim (Ship Mortgage Act 1920, § 30, subsec. B (4), and subsection 0 (a), being Comp. St. §§ 81464k, 8146400). The Smith & Terry No. 3, 16 F. (2d) 613.
V. LIABILITIES OF VESSELS AND OWN- ERS IN GENERAL.
84(!) (U. S. D. C. Wash.) Machinist, ployed by contractor repairing vessel, had cause of action against owner for injuries resulting from negligence of owner's employees.-Wal- lace v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 309.
Vessel owner held liable for injuries to con- tractor's employee from negligence of its em- ployees, in absence of specific stipulation in in- demnity agreement.-Id.
Owner's personal liability for injuries to con- tractor's employee resulting from negligence of its employees is not coextensive with liability in rem.-Id.
84(3) (U.S.C.C.A.) Shipowner's failure to furnish safe appliances for use of stevedores is negligence.-O'Connor, Harrison & Co. v. Klingel, 16 F. (2d) 460.
Owner held liable for injury to stevedore's employee by defective winch furnished by ves- sel.-Id.
84 (3) (U.S.D.C.Me.) Injury to longshore- man employed by contracting terminal company in falling from ladder, held due to negligence of company.-The Lillian, 16 F. (2d) 146.
84(3) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Owner's employees held to have negligently changed scaffolding without notice to contractor's employee work- ing in same hold.--Wallace v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 309.
Vessel owner held liable for injuries to con- tractor's employee resulting from defective scaffolding used by own employees.-Id. Negligence of owner's employees as to scaf- fold held proximate cause of injury to machinist repairing vessel.-Id.
84(5) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Machinist, making repairs on vessel for contractor, had right to assume proper care would be taken for his pro- tection.-Wallace v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 309.
Machinist, repairing vessel while employed by contractor, was charged only with known de- fects.-Id.
Hazard created by vessel owner held not or- dinary risk of employment, assumed by machin- ist.-Id.
Machinist, making repairs on yessel for con- tractor, had right to assume that owner's em- ployees, doing painting, would use reasonably safe appliances. Id.
86(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Alaska) Evidence of sim- ilar accident shortly after injury to person on wharf held competent to show vessel's appli- ance for unloading was defective.-Alaska S. S. Co. v. Katzeek, 16 F. (2d) 210.
Whether defendant's employé expected appli- ance to break inadmissible when willfulness or wantonness not charged.-Id.
VII. CARRIAGE OF GOODS.
121 (2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Second barge of tow, which collided with pier of guard gate on canal, held, on libel by shipper, unseaworthy, not having steering equipment.-The Tourist, 16 F. (2d) 154.
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
123 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Stowage of quebracho extract between-decks between No. 1 and No. 2 hatches from Buenos Aires to Boston held not negligent.-Monnier v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 812.
130 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Carrier held not at fault for proceeding with contract after barges' col- lision at canal gate.-The Tourist, 16 F.(2d) 154.
32(3) (App.D.C.) Contract for exchange of realty, executed by one joint owner with au- thority of the other, held not lacking in mutual- ity of remedy.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F.(2d) 339.
73 (App.D.C.) No one can be compelled to serve another against his will.-Robb v. Craw- ford, 16 F. (2d) 339.
III. GOOD FAITH AND DILIGENCE.
132(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Evidence held not to show carrier by barges abandoned contract of carriage on towing tug declining to proceed.95 The Tourist, 16 F. (2d) 154.
141(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Fusing together of 'bags of quebracho extract during shipment con- stituted change of character," within excep- tion of bill of lading.-Monnier v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 812.
Necessary effect of climate and heat on que- bracho extract, when ship passed through equa- torial region, was within exception of bill of lading.-Id.
146 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Full freight under bill of lading must be paid by shipper, who in course of transportation requires return of goods. The Tourist, 16 F. (24) 154.
148 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Deduction from freight must be made for shipper's expense for tug to complete trip, on tug hired by carrier quit- ting. The Tourist, 16 F. (2d) 154.
Shipper cannot counterclaim against freight money claim for fault in another independent shipment.-Id.
No exception to rule against counterclaiming for damages from other shipment arises from carrier's bankruptcy.-Id.
1502 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Pledge of freight money for advances to complete trip and for running other boats held valid. The Tourist, 16 F.(2d) 154.
VIII. CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS.
165 (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) $4,900 damag- es for steamship company's breach of contract of passage held clearly excessive, and result of passion and prejudice.-New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. Garcia, 16 F. (2d) 734.
XI. LIMITATION OF OWNER'S LIABILITY.
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
I. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF REMEDY IN GENERAL.
8 (App.D.C.) Specific performance of con- tract to exchange realty is within judicial dis- cretion.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F. (2d) 339. Court's discretion in matter of decreeing spe- cific performance is not arbitrary or capricious. -Id.
II. CONTRACTS ENFORCEABLE.
30 (App.D.C.) Lessee held entitled to specific performance of covenant to sell at stated price "on terms to be agreed on."-Mor- ris v. Ballard, 16 F. (2d) 175.
32(2) (App.D.C.) Lack of mutuality when contract was executed does not bar specific per- formance, if supplied on part of plaintiff before suit.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F. (2d) 339.
(App.D.C.) Where defendant waived tender of deed, failure of plaintiff to clear in- cumbrance before trial did not preclude specific performance.-Robb v. Crawford, 16 F.(2d)
I. POLITICAL STATUS AND RELATIONS. 4 (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) State statute, prevent- ed from operating on all subjects within its pur- view by congressional inhibition, becomes fully effective on removal of inhibition.-Buder v. First Nat. Bank, 16 F. (2d) 990.
4 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Conflict between statute and act of Congress need not be literal and express, to result in invalidity of former. -Staten Island Rapid Transit Ry. Co. v. Pub- lic Service Commission of State of New York. 16 F. (2d) 313.
9 (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Statute prohibiting in- mained in force after admission of Oklahoma troduction of liquor into Indian country re- as state (Comp. St. §§ 4136b, 4137aa).-Sharp v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 876.
191 (1) (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) By creating a com- mission with authority to sue and be sued, state, as to such commission, waives its consti- tutional immunity from suit (Const. Amend. U. S. 11; Comp. St. Wyo. 1920, §§ 3025-3037).— Utah Const. Co. v. State Highway Commission of Wyoming, 16 F.(2d) 322.
191(2) (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) Action on contract against state highway commission held one against the state.-Utah Const. Co. v. State Highway Commission of Wyoming, 16 F. (2d)
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
See Limitation of Actions.
For statutes relating to particular subjects, see the various specific topics.
1. ENACTMENT, REQUISITES, AND VA- LIDITY IN GENERAL.
~64(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) State act requiring electrification of railroads, invalid in parts con- flicting with federal statute, cannot be sustained as to other parts (New York Public Service Commission Law, § 53-a).-Staten Island Rap- id Transit Ry. Co. v. Public Service Commis- sion of State of New York, 16 F. (2d) 313. III. SUBJECTS AND TITLES OF ACTS.
109 (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) Porto Rican act is not violative of organic law, if objects thereof are germane to main subject or ap- propriate to accomplishment of objects fairly included therein (Organic Act Porto Rico, § 34). Arocho v. People of Porto Rico, 16 F. (2d) 90.
113(3) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) State statute, au- thorizing railroad to lease its road, held not in- valid, as embracing subjects not expressed in title (St. Cal. 1880, p. 21; Const. Cal. art. 4, § 24).-Barnes v. Southern Pac. Co., 16 F. (2d) 100.
118(6) (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) Provision of act temporarily abolishing death penalty, by which act was to stand repealed on certain date, held not ineffective, as not expressed in title (Acts Porto Rico 1917, No. 36, § 6; Organic
Act Porto Rico, § 34; Penal Code Porto Rico, §§ 202, 219).-Arocho v. People of Porto Rico, 16 F.(2d) 90.
V. REPEAL, SUSPENSION, EXPIRATION, AND REVIVAL.
172 (U.S.C.C.A.Porto Rico) Formal re-en- actment and publication of statute relating to death penalty, after temporary abolition or sus- pension by legislative act, held unnecessary (Penal Code Porto Rico, § 202; Acts Porto Rico 1917, No. 36).-Arocho v. People of Porto Rico, 16 F. (2d) 90.
VI. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. (A) General Rules of Construction. 176 (U.S.C.C.A.Or.) Construction of doubt- ful state statute will not be indulged by federal courts, where unnecessary for case.-Anderson v. Eischen, 16 F. (2d) 54.
190 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Courts cannot read pro- visions into unambiguous statutes.-Leeb v. U. S., 16 F. (2d) 937.
219 (U.S.C.C.A.R.I.) Construction of stat- ute adopted by department after it had been in operation for 14 years held of little weight to aid its interpretation by a court.-U. S. v. Manzi, 16 F. (2d) 884.
219 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Interpretation of copy- right law by Copyright Office is entitled to consideration.-Stephens v. Howells Sales Co., 16 F.(2a) 805.
226 (U.S.C.C.A.Wyo.) Rule that statute will be construed as it is construed by courts of state from which it is taken is subject to many exceptions.-Kraus v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 16 F. (2d) 79.
(D) Retroactive Operation. 263 (U.S.C.C.A.Alaska) Statutes are pre- sumed intended to operate prospectively.- Alaska Consol. Canneries v. Territory of Alas- ka, 16 F. (2d) 256.
STATUTES CONSTRUED.
Art. 1, § 2, subsec. 3......
1866, July 27, ch. 278, § 18, 14 Stat. 299.. 100 1870, July 8, ch. 230, 16 Stat. 198..... 598, 805 1871, March 3, ch. 122, 16 Stat. 573.. 100 1875, March 3, ch. 152, 18 Stat. 482. 374 1875, March 3, ch. 152, § 4, 18 Stat. 483... 374 1876, June 30, ch. 156, §§ 1-3, 19 Stat. 63 906 1876, Aug. 15, ch. 287, 19 Stat. 143. 653 1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379. See In- terstate Commerce Act.
1887, March 3, ch. 359, §§ 5, 6, 10, 24 Stat. 506, 507.
Art. 1, § 8, subsec. 1.
Art. 1, § 9, subsecs. 4, 5. Art. 1, § 10....
1888, Sept. 13, ch. 1015, § 7, 25 Stat. 477.. 492 1890, July 2, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209.
1890, Aug. 19, ch. 802, § 1, art. 16, 26 Stat. 326
1891, March 3, ch. 517, § 11, 26 Stat. 829.. 206 1891, March 3, ch. 565, § 1, 26 Stat. 1106.. 805 1892, May 5, ch. 60, § 6, 27 Stat. 25. Amended 1893, Nov. 3, ch. 14, § 1, 28 Stat. 7
.395, 459 .150, 290, 322 .297, 401, 639
Compiled Statutes, § 9585 et seq.
1892, July 23, ch. 234, 27 Stat. 260. 306 1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, § 3, 27 Stat. 445. 1893, March 2, ch. 196, 27 Stat. 531..313, 550 1893, March 2, ch. 196, § 2, 27 Stat. 531.. 550 1893, March 3, ch, 225, § 3, 27 Stat. 751.. 371 1893, Nov. 3, ch. 14, § 1, 28 Stat. 7... 492 1894, Aug. 13, ch. 280, 28 Stat. 278. Amended 1905, Feb. 24, ch. 778, 33 Stat.
811 1894, Aug. 27, ch. 349, § 48, 28 Stat. 563.. 197 233 1895, March 1, ch. 145, § 8, 28 Stat. 697.. 876 177 1897, Jan. 30 ch. 109, 29 Stat. 506.. 285 1898, July 1, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544. 769
693 1898, July 1, ch. 545, 30 Stat. 594.. 233 1900, April 12, ch. 191, § 1. 31 Stat. 77.
1901, March 3, ch. 854, §§ 1301-1303, 31 Stat. 1394, 1395..
1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, 33 Stat. 724...349, 490 1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, § 5, 33 Stat. 725.. 1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, § 5b, 33 Stat. 725 598 1905, Feb. 24, ch. 778, 33 Stat. 811.
1906, June 11, ch. 3073, 34 Stat, 232. 1906, June 16, ch. 3335, §§ 13, 16, 17, 34 Stat. 275, 276
1906, June 29, ch. 3591, 34 Stat. 584....
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
1906, June 29, ch. 3592, § 4(6), 34 Stat. 598 884 1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35 Stat. 65....550, 924 1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35 Stat. 65. Amended 1910, April 5, ch. 143, 36 Stat. 291
1918, Nov. 4, ch. 201, § 1, 40 Stat. 1020... 723 1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, 40 Stat. 1057. 1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 202, 40 Stat. 1060 358 1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 211(b), 40 Stat. 1062,
1912, Aug. 23, ch. 350, §§ 4, 6, 37 Stat. 413 653 1913, Oct. 3, ch. 16, 38 Stat. 114. 937 1913, Oct. 3, ch. 16, § 2(b), 38 Stat. 167.. 358 1913, Oct. 3, ch. 16, § 237, 38 Stat. 135... 937 1914, Sept. 26, ch. 311, § 5, 38 Stat. 719... 962 1914, Oct. 15, ch. 323, §§ 7, 16, 38 Stat. 731, 737 378 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, 38 Stat. 785....231, 709, 783, 870 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 1, 38 Stat. 785... 778 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 2, 38 Stat. 786..52, 709 1914. Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 6, 38 Stat. 789. 52 1915, March 4, ch. 153, § 3, 38 Stat. 1164 681 1915, March 4, ch. 153, § 20, 38 Stat. 1185. Amended 1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 33, 41 Stat. 1007
1916, Aug. 29, ch. 415, 39 Stat. 538. 1916, Sept. 8, ch. 463, §§ 2(a, c), 4, 39 Stat. 757, 758
1916, Sept. 8, ch. 463, § 14(c), 39 Stat. 772 98 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, 39 Stat. 874...105, 422 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 1, 39 Stat. 874... 532 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 3, 39 Stat. 875..532, 783 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 19, 39 Stat. 889. .15, 532, 783 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 20, 39 Stat. 890.. 105, 422, 958 422
1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, §§ 23, 39, 39 Stat. 892, 895
927 1919, Feb. 26, ch. 48, 40 Stat. 1181....62, 261, 457, 563, 704 1919, March 2, ch. 94, § 5, 40 Stat. 1274. Amended 1921, Nov. 23, ch. 137, 42 Stat. 322
1919, June 30, ch. 4, 41 Stat. 4. 1919, June 30, ch. 4, § 1, 41 Stat. 4.. 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 305.. ..57, 345, 568, 604, 670, 682, 816, 844, 951, 981 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, 41 Stat. 307
.604, 816 Stat. .434, 816 279
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 3, 41 308 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, §§ 6, 9, 41 Stat. 310, 311
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 21, 41 Stat. 314
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 315
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, 317
.595, 597 .115, 202, 754, 802 § 26, 41 Stat.
1917, Feb. 14, ch. 53, 39 Stat. 903. 1917, March 2, ch. 145, § 1, 39 Stat. 951.. 1917, March 2, ch. 145, § 20, 39 Stat. 957 1917, March 2, ch. 145, § 34, 39 Stat. 960.. 1917, March 2, ch. 145, § 37, 39 Stat. 964 1917, June 15, ch. 30, tit. 11, § 2(3), 40 Stat. 228
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 33, 41 Stat. 317 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 37, 41 Stat. 318 816 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 3, 41 Stat. 319.. 604 1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § 208(a), 41 Stat. 464 507 1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § 424, 41 Stat. 456.. 760 1920, June 5, ch. 250, 41 Stat. 988.
1920. June 5, ch. 250, § 33, 41 Stat. 1007 ..146, 930, 984, 1011 1921, May 19, ch. 8, 42 Stat. 5. 532 1921, May 19, ch. 8, §§ 1, 2, 42 Stat. 5.. 532 1921, May 19, ch. 8, § 2(d), 42 Stat. 5....1006 1921, Aug. 9, ch. 57, § 2, 42 Stat. 148. 1921, Aug. 9, ch. 57, § 27, 42 Stat. 156.... 390 1921, Nov. 17, ch. 127, 42 Stat. 1569. 1921, Nov. 23, ch. 134, 42 Stat. 222. 1921, Nov. 23, ch. 136, § 202 (a2), 42 Stat. 229
1917, Oct. 6, ch. 105, § 400, et seq., 40 Stat. 409
1917, Oct. 6, ch. 106, § 9(a, d), 40 Stat. 419. Amended 1923, March 4, ch. 285, § 1, 42 Stat. 1511.
1917, Oct. 6, ch. 106, § 10(c, f), 40 Stat. 420
1923, Feb. 28, ch. 153, 42 Stat. 1778. 1923, March 4, ch. 267, 42 Stat. 1499. 1923, March 4, ch. 285, § 1, 42 Stat. 1511..286 1923, March 4, ch. 291, § 7, 42 Stat. 1525.. 390 1924, June 2, ch. 234, § 277, 43 Stat. 299.. 367 1924, June 2, ch. 234, §§ 279 (a), 1001, 43 Stat. 300, 339
1918, March 21, ch. 25, 40 Stat. 451. 1918, March 21, ch. 25, § 10, 40 Stat. 456.. 130 1918, March 28, ch. 28, § 1, 40 Stat. 181 723 16 F. (2d)-68
1924, June 2, ch. 234, §§ 319-324, 43 Stat. 313
1924, June 2, ch. 234, § 1009, 43 Stat. 341. 367
« ПредыдущаяПродолжить » |