STREET RAILROADS. of its board of directors, see "Estoppel," § 1. *The question of the contributory negligence STREETS. PIERCE'S CODE. SUBROGATION. .. 840 Priority of right to, over rights of assignee, see "Assignments," $ 3. 840 SUIT. See “Action.” SUPERSEDEAS, 644 On appeal or writ of error, see "Appeal and Er- ror," $ 3. 644 SURETYSHIP. *Point annotated. See syllabus. SURRENDER. § 2. Infringement and unfair competi- tion. chargeable with unfair competition in using (C. C. A.) 141. *Though the word "keystone" may be a geo- graphical term, yet its use by one manufacturer in his trade-name or on his products to pass unfair competition, and entitle the latter to an injunction.-Buzby v. Davis (C. C. A.) 275. *The use of geographical terms to pass off the goods of one manufacturer as those of another Ć TRADE UNIONS. A trade union in Wisconsin which is merely an assemblage of persons not given the right by statute to sue or be sued in its common name cannot, as such, be fined for contempt made a party to the suit by name, and a gen- eral appearance was entered for it.-Allis-Chal- mers Co. v. Iron Molders' Union No. 125 (C. C.) 155. TRAFFIC CONTRACTS. Between railroads, see "Railroads," $ 1. TRANSFER TAX. See "Taxation," $ 1. TREES. As part of realty, see "Property." TOWAGE. TRIAL. Entry of judgment after trial of issues, see "Judgment," $ 1. For offense against postal laws, see "Post Of- fice," § 1. Of criminal prosecutions, see “Criminal Law,” 8 2. *Where there was positive testimony that sig- nals were given by a railroad train at a cross- were where they should have heard such signals, as a tion was one for the jury:-Detroit Southern R. *Point annotated. See syllabus. ---- *On a motion for direction of a verdict, the *The assignment of a firm's interest in a public of the firm in consideration of the receipt of the benefits to be derived from the execution of the agreement as assigned.-Hardaway & Prowell v. Taking of bail bonds by, see "Bail," $ 1. VACATION. gages.” VALUE. § 1. Requisites and validity of contract. A contract for the settlement of an adverse dor and purchaser.-Stevens v. McÕhrystal (C. C. A.) 85. A contract for a sale of real estate made be- tween the owner and a firm of brokers with as they stated, for a third person, whose name they could not disclose, held valid and enforce- able by such purchaser under the facts shown.- Woodward v. Davidson (C. C.) 840. *A letter written by plaintiff to defendant in response to defendant's offer to sell certain land held not an unconditional acceptance of de- fendant's offer, and therefore insufficient to con- stitute a contract of sale.-Sharp v. West (D. es." § 2. Construction and operation of con- tract. *Where a claimant of a mining location con- tracted to convey a portion thereof for $101.25 Plaintiffs, under a contract to complete a pub-crued immediately on the issuance of the pat- Where a vendor repudiated his alleged con- it was sufficient that the vendee offered in his 458. VENUE. see "Shipping," § 4. |