Absent or not voting-- Senators Husting, Richards, Snover, and White-4. And so the resolution was adopted. BILLS READY FOR ENGROSSMENT. No. 42, S. Amendment No. 1, S. Senator Albers offered amendment No. 2, S. Upon motion of Senator Linley, Was re-referred to committee on Judiciary. Senator Bosshard moved that Rule 11 be suspended for this session. Senator Randolph objected. The question was, Shall Rule 11 be suspended? The ayes and noes were required, and the vote was: Ayes, 11, noes, 18; absent or not voting, 4, as follows: Ayes-Senators Ackley, Albers, Bichler, Bosshard, Culbertson, Glenn, Kellogg, Martin A. E., Martin II. C., Snover, and Stevens-- 11. Noes Senators Browne, Burke, Cunningham, Hoyt, Huber, Kileen, Linley, Monk, Perry, Randolph, Scott, Skogmo, Teasdale, Tomkins, True, Weigle, Weissleder, and Zophy-18. Absent or not voting--Senators Bishop, Husting, Richards, and White- 4. And so the senate refused to suspend the rule. No. 71, S. Amendment No. 1, S., adopted. Ordered engrossed and read a third time. No. 72, S., and No. 74, S., Were each severally ordered engrossed and read a third time. No. 23, S. Senator Zophy offered amendment No. 1, S., Which amendment was adopted. Senator Linley offered amendment No. 2, S., Which amendment was refused adoption. Upon motion of Senator Zophy, No. 23, S., Was re-referred to committee on Judiciary. No. 59, S. A bill to create section 4256b of the statutes, relating to causes of action for illicit sexual intercourse. Senator Linley offered amendment No. 1, S. The question was, Shall amendment No. 1, S., to No. 59, S., be adopted? The ayes and noes were demanded, and the vote was: 19; noes, 8; absent or not voting, 6, as follows: Ayes, Ayes-Senators Ackley, Bichler, Bosshard, Browne, Culbertson, Cunningham, Glenn, Huber, Linley, Martin A. E., Monk, Perry, Randolph, Scott, Skogmo, Stevens, Teasdale, Tomkins, and Zophy-19. Noes-Senators Albers, Bishop, Burke, Hoyt, Kileen, Martin H. C., Weigle and Weissleder-8. Absent or not voting -Senators Husting, Kellogg, Richards, Snover, True, and White-6. And so the amendment was adopted. The question then was, Shall No. 59, S., be indefinitely postponed? The ayes and noes were demanded, and the vote was: Ayes, 28; noes, none; absent or not voting, 5, as follows: Ayes Senators Ackley, Albers, Bichler, Bishop, Bosshard, Browne, Burke, Culbertson, Cunningham, Glenn, Hoyt, Huber, Kileen, Linley, Martin A. E., Martin H. C., Monk, Perry, Randolph, Scott, Skogmo, Stevens, Teasdale, Tomkins, True, Weigle, Weissleder, and Zophy 28. Noes-None. Absent or not voting-Senators Husting, Kellogg, Richards, Snover, and White- 5. And so the bill was definitely postponed. Senator Linley arose to a question of parliamentary inquiry: Did not the adoption of the amendment make the question, Shall the bill be ordered engrossed and read a third time? The president stated: The practice of the senate when the committee recommends indefinite postponement, is to put the question upon the recommendation of the committee. Senator Linley moved that the vote by which No. 59, S., was indefinitely postponed, be reconsidered. A division was called for, and the motion was lost. No. 73, S., Was indefinitely postponed. BILLS READY FOR A THIRD READING. No. 21, S., Was re-referred to committee on Finance. No. 61, S., and No. 65, S., Were each severally read a third time, and passed. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1913. The senate met. 10:00 O'CLOCK A. M. Thet president pro tempore in the chair. The roll was called and the following senators answered to their names: Senators Ackley, Bichler, Bishop, Bosshard, Browne, Culbertson, Glenn, Huber, Kellogg, Kileen, Linley, Martin H. C., Monk, Randolph, Scott, Snover, Stevens, Teasdale, Tomkins, True, Weissleder, and Zophy 22. Absent-Senators Albers, Burke, Cunningham, Hoyt, Martin A. E., Perry, Richards, Skogmo, Weigle, and White Absent with leave-Senator Husting —1. 10, LEAVE OF ABSENCE. Upon request of Senator Tomkins, Leave of absence was granted to Senator Skogmo for this session. The journal of yesterday was approved. MOTIONS. Senator Linley asked unanimous consent to move that the vote by which No. 59, S., was indefinitely postponed be reconsidered. Such consent being given, Senator Linley moved that the vote by which No. 59, S., was indefinitely postponed, be reconsidered. The president put the motion. Senator Browne rose to a question of parliamentary inquiry: The senate having refused yesterday to reconsider this vote, can a motion to reconsider be entertained today, even by unanimous consent? The president stated, that had such a point of order been made before the motion was entertained he would have ruled, but unanimous consent having been given 'Senator Linley to make the motion, and the motion having been made, entertained and put, such a point of order could not now be made. The question was, Shall the vote by which No 59, S., definitely postponed be reconsidered? was inThe ayes and noes were demanded, and the vote was: Ayes, 22; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 10; as follows: Ayes-Senators Ackley, Bichler, Bishop, Bosshard, Browne, Glenn, Hoyt, Huber, Kellogg, Kileen, Linley, Martin H. C., Monk, Randolph, Scott, Snover, Stevens, Teasdale, Tomkins, True, Weissleder, and Zophy-22. Noes-Senator Culbertson-1. Absent or not voting - Senators Albers, Burke, Cunningham, Husting, Martin A. E., Perry, Richards, Skogmo, Weigle, and White-10. And so the vote was reconsidered. Upon motion of Senator Bosshard, No. 59, S., Was laid over until Wednesday, Feb. 26, 1913. BILLS INTRODUCED. Read first and second times and referred. No. 339, S. (Revision No. 273). By Senator Ackley. To special committee on Conservation. No. 340, S. (Revision No. 279). By Senator Culbertson (by request). To special committee on Insurance. No. 341, S. (Revision No. 293). By Senator Burke. To com mittee on Finance. To special To com No. 342, S. (Revision No. 306). By Senator Scott. committee on Insurance. No. 343, S. (Revision No. 310). By Senator Burke. mittee on State No. 344, S. (Revision No. 316). Affairs. By Senator Stevens. To com mittee on Judiciary. No. 345, S. (Revision No. 318). By Senator Zophy. To com mittee on Corporations. No. 346, S. (Revision No. 346). By Senator Bosshard. Το committee on Finance. No. 347. S. (Revision No. 354). By Senator Linley. mittee on Corporations. mittee on Judiciary. To com No. 348, S. (Revision No. 360). By Senator Kileen. To com No. 349, S. (Revision No. 363). By Senator Weigle. To committee on Finance. No. 350, S. (Revision No. 365). By Senator Teasdale. To special committee on Highways. No. 351, S. (Revision No. 368). By Senator Kileen. To committee on Judiciary. Pet. No. 10, S. Pet. No. 11, S. Pet. No. 12, S. PETITIONS. By Senator Monk (by request). To committee on Education and Public Welfare. By Senator Monk (by request). To committee on Education and Public Welfare. By Senator Browne. To committee on Education and Public Welfare. CHIEF CLERK, Senate, COMMUNICATION. FEBRUARY 21, 1913. Dear Sir: In compliance with the provisions of Joint Resolution No. 5, S., I am transmitting herewith list of those registered as legislative counsel or agents since last report. Name, residence and occupation of counsel; name and address of employer, and subject of legislation. W. R. Foley, Attorney at Law, Superior, Wis., representing Duluth Street Railway Co., Duluth, Minn., upon legislation affecting Street Railway Companies. Irving Herriott, 226 W. Jackson blvd., Chicago, Ill., representing C. & N. W. Ry. Co., same address, upon all legislation affecting railroads and other corporations. C. F. Lamb, Ellsworth Block, Madison, Wis., representing City and Village Ins. Co.'s Assn., Madison, Wis., acet. R. L. Adams, upon insurance matters. Chas. D. Penny, Wauwatosa, Wis., representing Town of Greenfield, upon all legislation affecting towns similarly situated. C. J. Boeckler, Jump River, Wis., lumberer and manufacturer, representing himself upon legislation affecting game laws. Frederic Cranefield, Madison, Wis., secretary Wisconsin State Horticultural Society, representing Wisconsin State Horticultural Society upon bills affecting horticulture. A. H. Hartwig, Watertown, Wis., representing himself upon all livestock, sanitary and veterinary matters. |